General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCatholic Hospital turns away woman in labor, she gives birth in car..fake pro lifers!
Nurse told her that she wasnt dialated enough..they wheeled her out the door. Baby born 8 minutes later in the car. Baby and mom ok, no thx to the fake prolifers------
In a statement, Franciscan Health Crown Point President and CEO Raymond Grady told ABC News that the hospital is investigating the incident.
We are grateful to learn from online and media reports that both mother and child are reportedly doing well," Grady said. "We understand the concern this has raised. The video is just one part of the information we are reviewing as part of a thorough investigation into this alleged incident."
He added, "While patient privacy laws make it difficult for us to comment more deeply, it is important to note that the videos and the narrative surrounding them do not accurately represent Franciscan Health Crown Points Catholic healthcare ministrys values, which include respect for life, compassionate concern and Christian stewardship. Our goal is to make everyone who walks through our doors feel the love of Christ through our actions."
Family says Indiana hospital discharged mom in labor, leading to roadside birth - ABC News
https://abcnews.go.com/US/family-indiana-hospital-discharged-mom-labor-leading-roadside/story?id=127625638
A husband had to deliver his baby in a truck on the side of the road after Franciscan Health Crown Point in Indiana kicked his pregnant wife out of the hospital due to a lack of cervical progress. The family believes this traumatic experience was preventable and may have been
: r/Minority_Strength https://www.reddit.com/r/Minority_Strength/comments/1oz547t/a_husband_had_to_deliver_his_baby_in_a_truck_on/
SamuelTheThird
(456 posts)Yes, she's not white.....
Prof. Toru Tanaka
(2,874 posts)Translation: they are thoroughly checking every avenue for a loophole.so they can escape blame.
jaymac
(125 posts)those B*****D's, I hope they have to pay and pay and pay.
Puppyjive
(895 posts)They need to pay these people lots of money. And I hope this gets a lot if air time. We need to change these laws.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(12,214 posts)Bread and Circuses
(1,417 posts)Its quite common for dilation to take longer or for it to stop.At that point, the attending physician will
recommend C-section rather than put the mom and fetus under more stress.
Was she admitted ? How did the nurse know that she wasnt dilated enough.
This hospital sounds like a hot mess.
ancianita
(42,638 posts)headlines of your links don't say that.
In both examples fake pro-lifers are the individuals who made the wrong decisions about the pregnant women -- not the org or religion they belong to. Reread the report. The very fact that
In the second example, some individual in that hospital decided on the pregnant woman's discharge instead of weighing her risks over the hospital's costs.
What those individuals decided that hurt those women was likely influenced by Indiana's or the hospital's culture. Those individuals prioritized the culture over their hospital's guidance. But they might not have if they'd known what would happen with those women afterward. But it's still on them. Possibly the hospitals are liable for those individuals' decisions, too. It's not clear in the report where the buck stopped.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,484 posts)and even here on DU despite democrats such as Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and AOC all being Catholic.
The Revolution
(872 posts)There is a huge problem with Catholic control of the healthcare system. Catholic hospitals are the only option in many areas. Then they want to stand between patients and their doctors and dictate what can and cannot be done, especially when it comes to anything related to a woman's reproductive system.
This drives providers away and makes getting healthcare even harder:
https://www.obgynpower.com/blog/how-the-catholic-hospital-in-mason-city-ia-drove-out-its-obgyns-by-forcing-them-to-stop-performing-tubals-and-discriminate-against-lesbians
I know there are a lot of Democrats who are Catholic, but my question is: why? Why are you part of a church if you don't agree with their stance on fundamental principals, like the right to health care, reproductive rights, right to marriage and LGBTQ rights, etc?
Democrats may be Catholic, but I don't think they should be. That church has inflicted (and continues to inflict) so much pain. I don't understand the praise the last couple Popes have gotten on here when they aren't even close to progressive on the issues that we are supposed to care about.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,484 posts)Have a nice day!
The Revolution
(872 posts)That actively harms people and opposes us on the issues we care about. My problem is with the church and its actions, not individual people. Though I would challenge them to consider if it really makes sense to be part of such an organization.
This is like saying there is anti-NRA bigotry or anti-Proud Boys bigotry on DU.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,484 posts)For proving my point.
The Revolution
(872 posts)Don't play stupid games. If you don't want to discuss an issue then don't bring it up. I'm through wasting my time.
Here's some fun emojis yay!
SocialDemocrat61
(6,484 posts)And thanks for repeatedly proving my point.
BeerBarrelPolka
(2,157 posts)and agree with you completely. Some people have no clue what the Catholic organization is all about. Catholic Big Brothers and Big Sisters, Catholic Charities, individual churches that were/are safe havens for many, spiritual counseling, etc, etc. For example, Catholic Charities help people of all religious denominations and atheists as well. Their hospitals have saved countless lives through the years. What some people don't know, is many Catholic hospitals have been sold to secular businesses. I go to one for my hearing aids.
We know all the good and bad about the Catholic church. But many forget just how helpful and life saving its organizations have been, here and worldwide.
EDIT: I started my boxing career in the CYO (Catholic Youth Organization) and it was one of the best things to ever happen in my young life, along with wrestling and music (all taught to me by Catholics).
SocialDemocrat61
(6,484 posts)and bad Catholics. Just as there are good Jews and bad Jews. Good Muslims and bad Muslims. Demonizing a whole religion IS bigotry but too many are blinded by their own prejudice to see it.
BeerBarrelPolka
(2,157 posts)That's a given. But just like loved ones, we don't have to agree with everything they say or do. I'm in a completely secular hospital for my strokes and polymyositis (Northwestern) and it's killing me. But, that hospital has helped a lot of people in Illinois. It's rated #1. In a perfect world I would have gone to the Cleveland Clinic for the best care in the world, but it didn't happen. But I know Northwestern has helped so many people through the years.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,484 posts)Stay strong
BeerBarrelPolka
(2,157 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(13,538 posts)Joe Biden was Catholic, but he wasn't "pro-life" in the RepoubliKKKan sense. He believed it was all between a woman and her doctor. Tim Kaine, my senator, is pretty much the same. I know a lot of Catholics like that. So don't lump them all in the same category. And the LOUDEST voices in the pro-life camp are the Talibangelicals, not Catholics (excluding the Shady McMaybellines of this world, of course). And Pope Francis and Pope Leo may throw out the "party line" on Abortion, they wer/are both understanding men who, I think, would be understanding of a woman's situation.
BeerBarrelPolka
(2,157 posts)They don't think Catholics are Christians.
Jilly_in_VA
(13,538 posts)Don't try to end run me.
BeerBarrelPolka
(2,157 posts)I'm on your side here. I'm a Catholic and I take offense to what he's written as well.
The Revolution
(872 posts)Democrats don't agree with the church on this fundamental issue. So why be part of it? They aren't going to change. The last 2 Popes made no attempt to do so.
Meanwhile look at who the church attracts as fresh converts - Newt Gingrich, JD Vance, Candace Owens. If they find it so appealing, why should we?
As far as being "understanding men", I don't think so. Let's look at another reproductive choice issue and see - surrogacy.
https://apnews.com/article/pope-surrogacy-vatican-russia-israel-ukraine-56acaa8500336db81ee18913a77ddc0f
This is deeply personal to me because we just had a son born through surrogacy. Why did we do this? Because when our first son was born, my wife had eclampsia and could have died and our son did die. I watched as they put the bumpers on the bed in case my wife started having seizures. I had to watch my son die in front of me. But because of what is a miracle of modern science, we were able to have another son with the help of a surrogate. She made a choice to help us, and I believe women should have the freedom to make whatever reproductive choices they want. Pope Francis didn't believe that. He wasn't understanding of the situation. Instead he thinks we're despicable. I say he can fuck off.
ancianita
(42,638 posts)In certain states, over 30% of all beds are in Catholic facilities.
2. Those number disprove your claim of Catholic "control" of healthcare.
3. Prove this. Provide official Catholic links to church doctrine, or provide even reputable source links, or you don't know what you're talking about.
4. Prove this with links, or you're spouting unsourced, fact free anti-Catholic bigotry.
The Revolution
(872 posts)1 & 2. I didnt say that they controlled everything, but the fact that they control nearly a third of third of beds some states should be alarming. Those nimbers in fact reinforce what I am saying. Healthcare is a human right, and no institution, be it government or church should be standing between patients and their doctors.
3. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/abortion/respect-for-unborn-human-life
I think it is pretty well established that the church doesn't recognize same-sex marriage, but here:
https://www.them.us/story/pope-leo-francis-same-sex-blessings-policy
So separate and unequal. Great. Would most people here today accept a Democratic candidate saying the government would "bless" same-sex unions, but not recognize them as marriages? Maybe 20 years ago, but I doubt many would approve of that now.
4. The article at the top answers this. This isn't some made up story, this is an ongoing issue where I live. My wife went to Dr. Quinn. The crackdown from the church drove her and most of the other OB doctor away. Not to a practice down the street, completely out of the area.
Crunchy Frog
(28,172 posts)and the Catholic Church which is an extraordinarily powerful institution that gets away with abusing far too many people.
If pointing that out makes me a bigot in some people's eyes, then so be it.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,484 posts)Unfortunately, many dont.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(12,214 posts)ancianita
(42,638 posts)illustrates your claim? If not, why did you bother to link the article? Or is the article only meant to be an example of your claim? If so, is the link's report a representative example of some kind of doctrinal practice in doctoring in "religious hospitals, Catholic or otherwise"?
Because it's standard practice for hospitals -- religious or otherwise -- to send pregnant women home when they are in early labor, which happens with 30% to 50% of women who go to an obstetrics triage unit of any hospital, religious or otherwise. This happens when labor is not yet "active," meaning the woman is not dilated to at least 6 cm or contractions are not regular and strong enough (typically less than 5 minutes apart). Hospitals send these individuals home to rest and wait for labor to progress, as they are generally healthy and not in immediate danger.
Crunchy Frog
(28,172 posts)have the power to single handedly decide to evict a laboring woman from the hospital?
This seems like a systemic problem rather than an individual act of wrongdoing.
A number of years ago, a Catholic hospital here tried to euthanize my mother's SO while he was there with pneumonia. I will never ever buy any talk of these Catholic run facilities being "pro-life".
hlthe2b
(112,178 posts)I am finding that emergency departments in many city hospitals that specialize in cardiovascular disease and surgeries, and secondarily, trauma, and within a hospital that has neither a pediatric nor an obstetrics department, are woefully inadequate to handle births or pediatric cases. In many cases, this is because a very nearby hospital specializes in one or both, but it is still unacceptable to have staff poorly trained in either. Children are not exactly a different species, yet some physicians seem to think they are treating a great ape, rather than a small human, for which readily available apps and hard-copy formularies are readily available to look up appropriate medication use and dosing. Heaven knows they should be able to get a ready consult if necessary via phone or Zoom call, but...
There is no excuse for what happened in this or any other hospital ER.
mopinko
(73,195 posts)in a fucking ambulance.
hlthe2b
(112,178 posts)them to transfer. Just as they cannot refuse emergent care to anyone under EMTALA, even while explaining limitations at the current hospital.
This is an issue of having proper staff training in the ERS across the country to be prepared for such eventualities. Simply stating they should transfer is NOT THE ANSWER. Believe me, I know.
Swede
(37,935 posts)nt
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(1,536 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(13,538 posts)Pretty sure he would not do this. He would summon midwives, or at least the women who traveled with him, make her comfortable, and see that the baby was delivered properly.
GJGCA
(169 posts)Tangential query, is that to their credit, discredit, or ...?
Jack Valentino
(4,058 posts)Trueblue1968
(18,971 posts)Maru Kitteh
(31,052 posts)Okay not rich, but they should at least be buying somebody a 4-year degree or a modest home.