General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis Is All John Roberts' Fault
Trump owes his corrupt and abusive reign to one man.
Pema Levy and Ari Berman
Imagine: You are at a baseball game, but something is off. When the blue team is at bat, the umpire calls every pitch a strike. But when the red team is up, the umpire wont call a single one. When a red batter hits the ball into a blue players gloveout!the umpire sends him to first base anyway. You cant believe what you are seeing. This is crazy, right? This is crazy. You look around. Does everyone else see what is happening?
Twenty years ago, John Roberts promised that as chief justice of the Supreme Court, he would be like an umpire, calling balls and strikes. His promise charmed senators and the media, who believed that his predilection for executive power and long-held antipathy for civil rights could be moderated by this commitment to faithfully apply the law. The delusion was so powerful that for two decades, the media defaulted to portraying him as a moderate institutionalist, pointing to high-profile decisionsto uphold parts of the Affordable Care Act or striking down President Donald Trumps attempt to ask about citizenship in the 2020 censusin which he broke from conservative orthodoxy. But those decisions were always the exception. Today, as the Roberts court rewrites the Constitution in the image of Trumpian autocracy, its become clear that Roberts promise to be a neutral umpire was a lie. We are watching a rigged game, and Roberts set it up.
The Roberts court has spent Trumps second term not applying the law so much as clearing it out of his way. In a matter of months, the courts 63 GOP-aligned majority has permitted a long list of lawless actions, including firing independent agency commissioners, using racial profiling in immigration sweeps, disappearing immigrants to authoritarian and war-torn nations, and defying Congress power of the purse. But the courts acquiescence to an antidemocratic America didnt start in 2025. Roberts has been embedding white-dominant authoritarianism into the countrys source code for two decades. Its impossible to imagine todays crisis without the Roberts court having first undermined the foundations of our democracy.
-snip-
Under the Roberts court, it wont be enough to rewrite the rules of the game. The umpires are the problem.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/11/john-roberts-donald-trump-supreme-court/
montanacowboy
(6,639 posts)stop the counting of ballots to allow Geo. W. Bush in the door. That was a nightmare to live through. Thanks Roberts.
turbinetree
(26,801 posts)turbinetree
(26,801 posts)valleyrogue
(2,475 posts)Roberts was a Bush II appointee upon the death of CJ Rehnquist. It was the Rehnquist court that ruled on Bush v. Gore.
madamesilverspurs
(16,443 posts)Roberts was a driving force on W's legal team that helped to engineer the pleadings that "persuaded" the Rehnquist court; his appointment was reward for that work. Also on that that team, Kavanaugh and Barrett. Great big steaming pile of coincidence, yes?
.
valleyrogue
(2,475 posts)The fact is he wasn't on the USSC at the time. It was asserted above that he was, and that is not true. The blame falls squarely on the majority of the Rehnquist court. They didn't have to buy what the Bush lawyers were selling.
yorkster
(3,581 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(10,197 posts)OConner was the swing vote who surprised everyone by siding with Rehnquist & Co. The Supreme Court went down the tubes when Reagan appointed Rehnquist and Scalia but especially when George HW put Clarence Thomas (a completely unqualified judge) on the court. Thomas made it ok to start putting on hacks. Rehnquist and Scalia at least had impeccable qualifications.
Fiendish Thingy
(21,628 posts)LisaM
(29,429 posts)That was Scalia and Clarence Thomas and Sandra Day O'Connor and William Rehnquist, all of whom should have recused themselves for conflict of interest. Kennedy, too, bit I can't think of a specific conflict he may have had.
Skittles
(168,743 posts)he absolutely DISGRACES the court
dalton99a
(91,324 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,628 posts)Ive read so many threads over the past several years that assert, with 100% certainty, that Meek Merrick Garland is the One and Only True Villain of this story
And now you come along and tell me that no, its actually John Roberts and the corrupt MAGA majority on SCOTUS who are the ones to blame?
Well, that changes everything
This member of the reality-based community thanks you for your rational perspective.
PS: court expansion, and killing the filibuster to do so, must be THE litmus test for every primary candidate running for congress or senate.
Without court expansion Dems, once back in power, will be blocked from repairing the damage of the Trump era and restoring Democracy.
dpibel
(3,723 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,628 posts)Hassler
(4,678 posts)GAtomboy
(294 posts)That was my thought . This is his doing. May he rot.
czarjak
(13,358 posts)Enough said?
mzmolly
(52,554 posts)should not be excused for his role.
valleyrogue
(2,475 posts)Roberts was a bit player compared to the untold damage Jeff Zucker, former head of CNN, did to the public. Zucker CREATED Trump the candidate for ratings in an attempt to make a joke candidate's campaign into a reality TV show.
If it weren't for Zucker, Trump would have been just another corrupt NYC real estate mogul, largely forgotten outside the Big Apple.
No Zucker, no Trump. No Trump, no packing the USSC with hack Federalist Society judges.
mdbl
(7,855 posts)Anita Hill tried to warn everyone. No one listened and here we are today - amidst the most corrupt supreme court in history.
mjvpi
(1,822 posts)An utterly corrupt decision that must be overturned by whatever mean necessary.
Uncle Joe
(63,770 posts)Thanks for the thread turbinetree
turbinetree
(26,801 posts)bronxiteforever
(10,985 posts)He assisted Clarence Thomas in his Supreme Court confirmation hearings and led campaigns to support the nominations of John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.
Puppyjive
(901 posts)My lawyer told me that years ago.
Chasstev365
(6,813 posts)republianmushroom
(22,122 posts)jfz9580m
(16,176 posts)I saw through the moderate bs.
He is not funny either. He is just a myopic bore:
https://www.courthousenews.com/supreme-court-revives-battle-over-frog-habitat-in-louisiana/
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chief-justice-roberts-gets-vivid-075742786.html
The endangered dusky gopher frog is cool unlike Roberts:

They are fighting a losing battle at least wrt being on the right side of history - these invasive, anti-environment assholes:
https://saveamphibians.org/