General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDUers please help me out
I was taught that we hung plants, paintings, photos etc but that we hang(ed) people. I a stunned to hear how many media folks including a Brit are using hung.
hlthe2b
(112,323 posts)llmart
(17,187 posts)John Holmes was hung.
Google him.
I am sooooo bad
Sogo
(6,874 posts)I'm also sooo bad....
hlthe2b
(112,323 posts)tblue37
(67,829 posts)#6 explains "hung" vs. "hanged." (Yes, that is from my grammar website.)
😀
samnsara
(18,695 posts)...good one
llmart
(17,187 posts)PJMcK
(24,497 posts)EYESORE 9001
(29,349 posts)The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, but when it comes to humans being murdered/executed, it shall remain hanged.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,298 posts)I grew up with a mother who knew all the rules of grammar, backwards, forwards and sideways, and heard so many corrections of the TV and radio. Pronunciation too (eg the difference between "Wales" and "whales" ).
malaise
(291,518 posts)and she spoke three languages
samnsara
(18,695 posts)the brits are wrong
of all my elementary school english, that one has stuck ( stank?) on me.
PJMcK
(24,497 posts)Tom Dyer
(316 posts)Its hanged.
multigraincracker
(36,767 posts)If the message is conveyed, you have spoken correctly.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,542 posts)are porn actors
Goonch
(4,139 posts)
Tanuki
(16,216 posts)seems to have sneaked its way into common usage!
RazorbackExpat
(797 posts)and vice versa. My 3rd grade teacher always cringed when she heard the country boys talking like that.
Or when people over use reflexive pronouns, or mix up pronoun cases, like using subjective case pronouns when there are multiple objects, or vice versa
PJMcK
(24,497 posts)I stayed in touch with her after school as she was one of the finest teachers I had. She made a fascinating point that has stuck with me.
The conversation started simply enough. I asked about the expression, "It begs the question..." I was confused because we had been taught that it meant circular reasoning in that it proposed an argument that assumed its own conclusion, that is, the idea being put forth would lead to its result. My confusion was based on some common uses that implied, "it raises the question..." which does not have a conclusion.
After a long pause, she began one of her long, deep, historical lectures that I admired her for.
I could never cover all of her points, but the gist of her discussion was that languages, particularly English, are constantly evolving with new words and phrases being developed as cultures, technologies and politics changed over time. She also pointed out that the increasing global economy meant that different peoples speaking different languages were interacting and needed commonality instead of grammatical perfection. Additionally, the diminishment of the Classical liberal education would result in a lower level of expression.
She was a classicist who had written her Master's thesis about "The Canterbury Tales" in the original Olde English. With the tiniest hint of disdain, she also pointed out that American culture seamed to becoming influenced more and more by "vulgar" language which, to her mind, would lower the level of public and private discourse. Nail meet head.
She was a great teacher and a few years ago I attended her funeral where I met some great folks from her years as an educator.
In the era of The Vulgarian, the internet and texting it's not surprising to see the language shifting beneath our feet. I speak French and I'm learning Spanish in Panama and I suspect those languages, along with others, are evolving similarly.
My dear malaise, we shall stand together upon the ramparts defending The Queen's English against the heathens!
P.S. Another point she forcefully argued was that words have meanings. That's why a proper dictionary has 100,000 words. As she would say, people with small vocabularies have feeble minds.
allegorical oracle
(6,060 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,805 posts)PatrickforB
(15,312 posts)JoseBalow
(9,007 posts)
malaise
(291,518 posts)😂
usonian
(22,767 posts)There is no regularity to language. I was a champion speller until I learned other languages.
Savour the day!
madinmaryland
(65,640 posts)Happy Hoosier
(9,318 posts)You are correct that that is the historical use.
However, in the last couple decades, using "hung" for people is gaining acceptance. Kinda like dropping the usage of "whom" is gaining acceptance. Languages evolve. At least, that's what my wife the English Professor says.
malaise
(291,518 posts)Rec
ForgedCrank
(2,995 posts)over time in language, and it's never for the better.
I have to suffer a daily barrage of "finna" and "imma" type garbage and all it does it make me question the intelligence of the people I'm interacting with.. Seems that few are interested in speaking English properly at this point.
3catwoman3
(28,313 posts)ForgedCrank
(2,995 posts)solely on the context in which is it normally used, I believe it's the same thing as "imma". In other words, "I'm going to"
Tanuki
(16,216 posts)i.e., "getting ready to."
Scrivener7
(57,970 posts)W_HAMILTON
(9,946 posts)TheProle
(3,845 posts)malaise
(291,518 posts)Love me some Blazing Saddles😀
obamanut2012
(29,079 posts)Unless you are talking about a man's large penis.
For real.