Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(26,801 posts)
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 12:07 AM Saturday

NTSB releases frame-by-frame images of engine separating during deadly UPS crash in Louisville

Updated Nov 20, 2025
By Alexandra Skores Pete Muntean

A critical mount that kept the left engine attached to the UPS flight that crashed in Louisville earlier this month failed only moments after the doomed flight broke ground, according to a new report from the National Transportation Safety Board

The report includes stunning frame-by-frame photos of the left engine of three-engined McDonnell Douglas MD-11F separating from the plane and going up and over the wing and igniting a fireball seen in a sequence of six extraordinary new images obtained by investigators.

The three pilots of UPS flight 2976 and 11 people on the ground were killed when the beleaguered jet sliced a half-mile long debris field across a petroleum recycling facility and UPS warehouse, setting off a massive blaze of fire and black smoke visible for miles.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/20/us/ups-plane-crash-ntsb-report

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NTSB releases frame-by-frame images of engine separating during deadly UPS crash in Louisville (Original Post) turbinetree Saturday OP
Here's a good analysis Renew Deal Saturday #1
Not a pilot, but you know how they say it's not usually a single cause but a series of mistakes? scipan Saturday #2
Depends what comes out in the investigation Sympthsical Saturday #3
Yes NTSB is amazing. What is also amazing is, it would have been survivable if scipan Saturday #4

scipan

(2,963 posts)
2. Not a pilot, but you know how they say it's not usually a single cause but a series of mistakes?
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 10:36 AM
Saturday

This seems like a single point failure. Even maintenance wasn't at fault since they only inspect it every 6 years.

I wonder if it's a design flaw, but it lasted for 34 ? (or something) years.

6 years seems like a pretty long time.

Sympthsical

(10,775 posts)
3. Depends what comes out in the investigation
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 11:14 AM
Saturday

When a similar incident with an engine mount occurred on Flight 191 in 1979, the culprit was faulty maintenance procedures. The ground crew were taking shortcuts to reduce turn around times. It didn't fail right away. A little crack that grew over time until the mount failed. They're certainly going to go through all the logs and see what the history was there.

Sometimes it's something ridiculously small. Like that Sioux City crash landing. A microscopic defect in the titanium of a fan disc led to fatigue cracking that went undetected.

The NTSB is fascinatingly good at figuring this stuff out.

scipan

(2,963 posts)
4. Yes NTSB is amazing. What is also amazing is, it would have been survivable if
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 11:34 AM
Saturday

the engine had broken off in a cleaner way, not gone above the wing and broken apart.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NTSB releases frame-by-fr...