General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCongressional pensions. Not exactly what many think.
Congressional pension
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Congressional pension is a pension made available to members of the United States Congress. As of 2019, members who participated in the congressional pension system are vested after five years of service. A pension is available to members 62 years of age with 5 years of service; 50 years or older with 20 years of service; or 25 years of service at any age. A reduced pension is available depending upon which of several different age/service options is chosen. If Members leave Congress before reaching retirement age, they may leave their contributions behind and receive a deferred pension later.[1] The current pension program, effective January 1987, is under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), which covers members and other federal employees whose federal employment began in 1984 or later. This replaces the older Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) for most members of congress and federal employees.
History
Members of Congress voted to extend pension benefits to the legislative branch under the CSRS (formerly limited to the executive branch) in January 1942 under a provision of P.L. 77-411. Congress repealed their pension two months later, due to public outcry in the early months of America's involvement in World War II. It was not until after the war, in 1946, that Congress would be covered under the CSRS with the passage of P.L. 79-601. The justification this time was that a pension would "bring into the legislative service a larger number of younger members with fresh energy and new viewpoints" by encouraging older Members to retire.
The Social Security Amendments of 1983 required all Members of Congress to participate in Social Security beginning January 1, 1984.[2] As Social Security and CSRS benefits sometimes overlapped, Congress called for the development of a new federal employee retirement program to complement Social Security. This new plan was enacted as the Federal Employees' Retirement Act of 1986. This act created the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), under which new Members of Congress are currently covered.
When the FERS program went into effect, all Members elected in 1984 or later were automatically enrolled in the new plan. More senior Members were free to remain under the CSRS or enroll in the new FERS plan.[3]
The FERS program takes into account the years served and the average pay for the top three years in terms of payment. For example, a member elected before 1984 and thus qualifying under the CSRS plan, who worked for 22 years and who had a top three-year average salary of $154,267 would be eligible for a pension payment of $84,847 per year.[4] A member elected after 1984 would have been enrolled under the FERS plan, and their pension payment under similar conditions ($154,267 top three-year average salary, but with only 20 years of service, rather than the 22 in the CSRS example) would be $52,451.[4]
The accrual rate for congressional service between 1984 and December 31, 2012, is covered by a FERS "special" computation that is similar to that for Federal employees such as First Responders, FBI Special Agents, and Air Traffic Control Officers. The accrual rate is 1.7% for the first 20 years and 1.0% for each year beyond the 20th. The basic retirement annuity under FERS is equal to the (Average High-3 Salary x .017 x Years of Service through 20 years)+(High-3 Salary x .01 x Years of Service over 20)= Annual Pension Members who began congressional service before 1984 and who elected to join FERS will receive credit under FERS from January 1, 1984, forward. Thus, at the close of the 108th Congress in December 2004, participants had a maximum of 21 years of service under FERS. Assuming that a Member retired at the end of 2004 with 20 years of congressional service under FERS, and a high-3 average salary of $154,267, the initial annual FERS pension in 2005 would be: [$154,267 x .017 x 20] = $52,451 There is no maximum pension under FERS. (It would take 66 years of service under FERS to reach the 80% maximum permissible under CSRS.) The smallest unreduced FERS pension is 8.5% of high-3 salary with five years of service (.017 x 5 years), which is payable no earlier than age 62. A Member with 10 years of service who takes a FERS pension at the earliest allowable age of 55 would receive a reduced pension equal to 11% of high-3 salary (.017 x 10 years, reduced by .05 times the seven-year difference between the individual's age at retirement and age 62).[4] For Members of Congress covered by FERS after December 31, 2012, the accrual rate for congressional service covered by FERS is 1.0% per year of service, or, if the Member has at least 20 years of service and serves until at least the age of 62, the benefit accrual rate is 1.1% per year of service. This is the same accrual rate that applies to regular FERS employees and applies to members of Congress first elected in 1984 or later.[5]
In 2002, the average congressional pension payment ranged from $41,000 to $55,000.[6] As of November 2014, senior Members of Congress who have been in office for at least 32 years can earn about $139,000 a year.[7]
All senators and those representatives serving as members prior to September 30, 2003, may decline this coverage. Representatives entering office on or after September 30, 2003, cannot elect to be excluded from such coverage. Members who were already in Congress when Social Security coverage went into effect could either remain in CSRS or change their coverage to FERS.[5]
. . . . .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_pension
mr715
(2,420 posts)And it isn't like many of them aren't already incredibly wealthy.
I am increasingly of the (cliche) opinion that we need to make serving in Congress a lot less lucrative so we have fewer entrenched corrupt players.
Give them minimum wage + 20%, whatever. And a stipend to cover travel costs to their districts.
niyad
(128,789 posts)a clear understanding of congressional pensions. Many people assume, have been told, that congress members receive full pensions even after a single term, regardless of age. And are assuming the date of mtg's resignation is a calculated move for a huge windfall.
I agree.
Her pension was not a major part of her calculation.
Being a member of Congress or a former member of Congress still remains highly lucrative.
Why the sighhhh?
niyad
(128,789 posts)senseandsensibility
(24,088 posts)If they get that for life, it's extremely valuable, especially if they only worked a few years.
niyad
(128,789 posts)Since mtg's worth, on paper at least, is somewhere between 25 and 50 million, I would guess health coverage was not a major factor. I could be wrong.
wishstar
(5,796 posts)just like retired federal employees, so it isn't free. For instance the Blue Cross Federal basic plan for self plus spouse is over $600 per month as of Jan. 2026. If 65 and older, they might decide to just pay Medicare premiums.
senseandsensibility
(24,088 posts)with a pension and no healthcare it was over two thousand dollars a month and that was five years ago.