Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
***Breaking News*** Cases Against James Comey and Letitia James Dismissed (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth 8 hrs ago OP
Ketchup alert Prairie Gates 8 hrs ago #1
Bring in the condiments and close the shutters! Hugin 8 hrs ago #3
Incoming MustLoveBeagles 8 hrs ago #18
Great first reply! nt Shermann 3 hrs ago #65
Yes senseandsensibility 8 hrs ago #2
HA!!! Nittersing 8 hrs ago #4
YES! democrank 8 hrs ago #5
More on this MarineCombatEngineer 8 hrs ago #6
And CNN does list the James case under the same reason muriel_volestrangler 8 hrs ago #8
So much winning for Pedonald, Blondi and Hooligan. MarineCombatEngineer 8 hrs ago #11
Steam emanating from the ears of EvaBlonde and Lindsay Halli-gone! lastlib 7 hrs ago #34
Case dismissed, but without prejudice, which means it can be brought again allegorical oracle 8 hrs ago #7
Wouldn't it be past the statute of limitation? SamuelTheThird 8 hrs ago #9
I think because they brought the charge they get one more bite at the apple with a six month boston bean 8 hrs ago #12
Meidas says Limitations *expired* for COMEY, not for JAMES. UTUSN 8 hrs ago #14
they have 6 months to re-file for Comey Celerity 7 hrs ago #37
There has been a question of whether Comey was actually legally indicted in the first place Renew Deal 7 hrs ago #46
That is not what the lawyers on MS NOW are saying. I am not a lawyer, so I can only go off what they say. Celerity 7 hrs ago #49
I don't know what they are saying or what you heard Renew Deal 6 hrs ago #51
That issue is before a different judge Jersey Devil 2 hrs ago #66
I believe that issue is now moot Boo1 1 hr ago #70
Yes for Comey, H2O Man 8 hrs ago #15
and trump will probably refile, just to be a sh*t. slightlv 7 hrs ago #30
Right. H2O Man 7 hrs ago #35
I too am a NY resident. choie 7 hrs ago #43
So do I. DinahMoeHum 7 hrs ago #44
And I've not seen anything to dissuade me that she is one of the more honest, slightlv 6 hrs ago #50
By which DOJ lawyer, Blanche? zorbasd 6 hrs ago #55
Rubin explained that when a Statute of Limitation is involved, there is the allegorical oracle 8 hrs ago #17
Let's just see them Jilly_in_VA 8 hrs ago #10
Maybe Dershowitz will come out tavernier 8 hrs ago #23
Pirro!!! underpants 8 hrs ago #28
Yeah, I don't understand why the Judge didn't shut this down entirely especially for James Bev54 8 hrs ago #19
No, Comey's charges are not dead: Celerity 7 hrs ago #40
So if she was never authorized to bring the charges to begin with, how can they retry? Bev54 4 hrs ago #64
Don't Pee in my Wheaties Justice Brandeis 7 hrs ago #33
I'm pretty sure the statute of limitations has run out against Comey Wiz Imp 6 hrs ago #54
So, when do the disbarments begin? Baitball Blogger 8 hrs ago #13
No... BurnDoubt 8 hrs ago #16
It's important to note that the government's intent, here, is to make Comey and James as allegorical oracle 8 hrs ago #20
Yet another case where sloppy catches up with TSF. Sneederbunk 8 hrs ago #21
But...but...she looks like a high powered layer in front of cameras! mwmisses4289 8 hrs ago #22
Yeah...djt selects from Central Casting (and loyal friends), not qualifications. That allegorical oracle 8 hrs ago #25
That's pronounced "liar." nt Wednesdays 8 hrs ago #27
I know - Kim Kardashian. She wants to be a lawyer so she took the shortcut way to becoming one. Marie Marie 5 hrs ago #58
Maybe Kim Kardashian will be the next Attorney General Blumancru 5 hrs ago #60
DOJ(oke) has a sad. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 8 hrs ago #24
High level spin doctoring is in progress. Somehow this is Biden's fault. twodogsbarking 8 hrs ago #26
I hope they fight back with the laws that Trump despises. twodogsbarking 7 hrs ago #29
Even though LilElf70 7 hrs ago #31
We're crossing rivers malaise 7 hrs ago #32
Blame Obama Ray Bruns 7 hrs ago #36
Does Bondi lose her job? Johonny 7 hrs ago #38
Since SHE has had the entire Epstein file for months now & an army of peeps combing thru it... Attilatheblond 5 hrs ago #59
The Trump administration is appealing the ruling because the judge did not consider Ray Bruns 7 hrs ago #39
That's so bad MorbidButterflyTat 5 hrs ago #61
MAGAt bomb threats/death threats to judge incoming in 3, 2, 1... (n/t) AdamGG 7 hrs ago #41
Hire a fucking parking lot lawyer Aviation Pro 7 hrs ago #42
Habba is the parking lot lawyer Fiendish Thingy 7 hrs ago #48
Ambulance Chaser, for short. multigraincracker 6 hrs ago #56
No, I think she worked *for* the insurance company. Nt Fiendish Thingy 4 hrs ago #62
Thank you. multigraincracker 2 hrs ago #67
Ambulance Chaser, for short. multigraincracker 6 hrs ago #57
Gee... Fiendish Thingy 7 hrs ago #45
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! And even sooner than I thought!!! marble falls 7 hrs ago #47
Well, at least the trump admin wasted some taxpayer money Turbineguy 6 hrs ago #52
Awesome 😎 iluvtennis 6 hrs ago #53
Put on your raincoats and visors orangecrush 4 hrs ago #63
I can't forgive or forget that Comey cost Hillary Raine 2 hrs ago #68
Kick. N/T Upthevibe 1 hr ago #69

Hugin

(37,174 posts)
3. Bring in the condiments and close the shutters!
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:45 PM
8 hrs ago

CALL CONGRESS RIGHT FRICKING NOW!!iii1!!

MarineCombatEngineer

(17,071 posts)
6. More on this
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:47 PM
8 hrs ago
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/james-comey-case-dismissed-judge-lindsey-halligan/

Judge orders James Comey case dismissed after finding top prosecutor was unlawfully appointed


By Melissa Quinn, Jacob Rosen
November 24, 2025 / 12:40 PM EST / CBS News

Add CBS News on Google
Washington — A federal judge on Monday ordered the criminal charges against former FBI Director James Comey to be dismissed on the grounds that Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. attorney who secured the indictment, was unlawfully appointed to the role.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie is a significant victory for Comey, who has argued his prosecution is retaliatory and motivated by President Trump's efforts to punish his political foes. The Justice Department is likely to appeal Currie's ruling and ask for it to be halted.

But Comey's lawyers are seeking to have the indictment tossed out on numerous other legal grounds, including that his prosecution is vindictive and selective. A decision on that argument remains pending.

This is a developing story and will be updated.


No catsup bottle is safe today.

MarineCombatEngineer

(17,071 posts)
11. So much winning for Pedonald, Blondi and Hooligan.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:53 PM
8 hrs ago


This is a major smackdown and embarrassment for them.

allegorical oracle

(6,037 posts)
7. Case dismissed, but without prejudice, which means it can be brought again
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:49 PM
8 hrs ago

in six months. That's according to Lisa Rubin.

boston bean

(36,827 posts)
12. I think because they brought the charge they get one more bite at the apple with a six month
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:54 PM
8 hrs ago

window.

Celerity

(53,196 posts)
37. they have 6 months to re-file for Comey
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:46 PM
7 hrs ago
18 U.S. Code § 3288 - Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3288#

Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information, or, in the event of an appeal, within 60 days of the date the dismissal of the indictment or information becomes final, or, if no regular grand jury is in session in the appropriate jurisdiction when the indictment or information is dismissed, within six calendar months of the date when the next regular grand jury is convened, which new indictment shall not be barred by any statute of limitations. This section does not permit the filing of a new indictment or information where the reason for the dismissal was the failure to file the indictment or information within the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations, or some other reason that would bar a new prosecution.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 828; Pub. L. 88–139, § 2, Oct. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 248; Pub. L. 88–520, § 1, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7081(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4407.)

Renew Deal

(84,591 posts)
46. There has been a question of whether Comey was actually legally indicted in the first place
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:22 PM
7 hrs ago

So that wouldn't apply if he wasn't legally indicted. I'm not sure if the question of whether he was legally indicted is still valid based on the case being dismissed, but he is likely done.

Celerity

(53,196 posts)
49. That is not what the lawyers on MS NOW are saying. I am not a lawyer, so I can only go off what they say.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:26 PM
7 hrs ago

Cheers.

Renew Deal

(84,591 posts)
51. I don't know what they are saying or what you heard
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:32 PM
6 hrs ago

But the question was whether he was legally indicted in the first place since the indictment wasn't presented to the entire grand jury.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/comey-seeks-indictment-dismissed-due-vindictive-prosecution/story?id=127643726

Jersey Devil

(10,695 posts)
66. That issue is before a different judge
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 06:32 PM
2 hrs ago

He has not ruled yet and now that the indictment was thrown out by a different judge I don't know if there ever will be a ruling since the issue is now moot with the indictment being thrown out. I am curious to see what the other judge does now.

Boo1

(60 posts)
70. I believe that issue is now moot
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 08:18 PM
1 hr ago

The ruling here is that Halligan was illegally appointed. All of the indictments that she brought are invalid. I think that will end the question over the validity of the indictment since it's now been dismissed.

slightlv

(7,112 posts)
30. and trump will probably refile, just to be a sh*t.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:33 PM
7 hrs ago

That would be SO like him.... especially since it's against a black woman. Women, in general and black women, in particular, push certain buttons in him. They seem to be the only section of humanity that can make him pay for his crimes in any way. That's why he hates them so much. Just like the Epstein files... women, girls, women, girls, everywhere trying to make him pay for his crimes. When he doesn't consider we, AS women, have any rights whatsoever in this country! I guess he thought if he could just get the right woman he could cancel out any advancement that James made against him. It's so infuriating!

H2O Man

(78,330 posts)
35. Right.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:41 PM
7 hrs ago

The DOJ will appeal the decision -- they likely already had the appeal prepared. But it goes to the 4th, that referred it to this judge. And though they will file next with the USSC, it will not be heard.

On Saturday evening, I had an interesting conversation with my younger son on his thoughts about why the felon hates women. And you hit the nail on the head about the intensity of his hatred for black women.

As a NYS resident, I really like AG James. She is at very least a thousand times more intelligent than anyone in the administration.

slightlv

(7,112 posts)
50. And I've not seen anything to dissuade me that she is one of the more honest,
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:30 PM
6 hrs ago

sincere AGs we've had. I've been totally impressed by her. That's dangerous to naivete in today's world, but she's not given me any reason to doubt it. I'm glad trump got a comeuppance on this.

allegorical oracle

(6,037 posts)
17. Rubin explained that when a Statute of Limitation is involved, there is the
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:06 PM
8 hrs ago

opportunity -- within that six-month timeframe -- to refile. The judicial district will (somehow) select a prosecuting attorney to replace the government's choice. Rubin also mentioned that there is a possible way to keep the prosecution open an additional 210 days.

Jilly_in_VA

(13,592 posts)
10. Let's just see them
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 12:52 PM
8 hrs ago

try to find a COMPETENT prosecutor who will touch these cases. I predict they can't.

Bev54

(13,069 posts)
19. Yeah, I don't understand why the Judge didn't shut this down entirely especially for James
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:10 PM
8 hrs ago

Comey's charges are dead.

Celerity

(53,196 posts)
40. No, Comey's charges are not dead:
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:49 PM
7 hrs ago
18 U.S. Code § 3288 - Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3288#

Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information, or, in the event of an appeal, within 60 days of the date the dismissal of the indictment or information becomes final, or, if no regular grand jury is in session in the appropriate jurisdiction when the indictment or information is dismissed, within six calendar months of the date when the next regular grand jury is convened, which new indictment shall not be barred by any statute of limitations. This section does not permit the filing of a new indictment or information where the reason for the dismissal was the failure to file the indictment or information within the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations, or some other reason that would bar a new prosecution.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 828; Pub. L. 88–139, § 2, Oct. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 248; Pub. L. 88–520, § 1, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7081(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4407.)

Bev54

(13,069 posts)
64. So if she was never authorized to bring the charges to begin with, how can they retry?
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 04:50 PM
4 hrs ago

I realize that statute under normal circumstances but those were never lawful charges in the first place. Seems suspect to me.

Wiz Imp

(8,326 posts)
54. I'm pretty sure the statute of limitations has run out against Comey
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:53 PM
6 hrs ago

so I don't think they can refile that one.

allegorical oracle

(6,037 posts)
20. It's important to note that the government's intent, here, is to make Comey and James as
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:11 PM
8 hrs ago

miserable as possible. Don't believe djt shivs a git whether they're actually prosecuted successfully.

allegorical oracle

(6,037 posts)
25. Yeah...djt selects from Central Casting (and loyal friends), not qualifications. That
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:26 PM
8 hrs ago

may work for Hollywood or feeling good, but not for the nation's government.

Marie Marie

(10,772 posts)
58. I know - Kim Kardashian. She wants to be a lawyer so she took the shortcut way to becoming one.
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 03:32 PM
5 hrs ago

Failed the Bar and blamed it on AI. AND - just for Donald - she plays one (very badly) on TV where she dresses like a hooker with her blouse unbuttoned and slits in her business suit skirt up to her upper thigh. Perfect for Donald.

LilElf70

(1,235 posts)
31. Even though
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:36 PM
7 hrs ago

you knew it would end this way, ya just never know with Trumps lil troopers.

I wanna be a fly at the White (excuse me - fake gold leaf) House today.

I'm guessing someone is having a fit, throwing poop all over the wall. HAGD.

Attilatheblond

(7,872 posts)
59. Since SHE has had the entire Epstein file for months now & an army of peeps combing thru it...
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 03:44 PM
5 hrs ago

pretty likely she has enough on Trump from all of it that she will never be insecure in the AG slot. Possible she will never have to actually work again in her life because there are lots more people beyond Trump in those files. She can be the blackmail queen as long as she manages to stay out of range of any hitman hired by the other blackemailees.

Ray Bruns

(5,823 posts)
39. The Trump administration is appealing the ruling because the judge did not consider
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 01:48 PM
7 hrs ago

The size of Lindsey Halligan‘s rack in her decision

Aviation Pro

(15,110 posts)
42. Hire a fucking parking lot lawyer
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:01 PM
7 hrs ago

Get a fucking parking lot result.

Halligan has a couple of choices moving forward: Fux Noise and Only Fans.

Fiendish Thingy

(21,628 posts)
48. Habba is the parking lot lawyer
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:22 PM
7 hrs ago

Halligan is the insurance lawyer with no prior prosecutorial experience

Fiendish Thingy

(21,628 posts)
45. Gee...
Mon Nov 24, 2025, 02:21 PM
7 hrs ago

Who would have thought rushing to a grand jury to seek an indictment without crossing the t’s and dotting the i’s would result in a dismissal?

Surely, if it were anybody else, the case would have proceeded to trial without a hitch, amirite?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»***Breaking News*** Cases...