Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,124 posts)
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 08:29 AM Wednesday

The Trump administration knows that the Supreme Court won't let a Cabinet secretary be dragged into court to testify 🧵

Cristian Farias
‪@cristianfarias.com‬

Why they’re doing this:

The Trump administration knows that the Supreme Court won’t let a Cabinet secretary be dragged into court to testify. (She may file an affidavit, as she’s already done in this litigation.)

So the only recourse here is to pierce executive and/or attorney-client privilege.

I’m not a betting man, but my guess is that James Boasberg has been around the block long enough that … he’s going to go for it. May even appoint outside counsel.

One possibility: Because his inquiry relates to criminal contempt, he may invoke the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege.

Another one:

James Boasberg has been around the block long enough that he doesn’t need to pierce attorney-client privilege. All he needs is testimony from everyone except the top brass, including the general counsel, to get at the nature of what lower-level employees communicated up the chain.

Remember: The lawyers who received the judge’s orders in the courtroom on March 15, 2025, only had one job: Telling their clients about the order and the need to comply.

If everyone down the chain understood that unambiguously, then you don’t need top brass or the “privileged” advice they got.

More fundamentally:

Judge Boasberg may be trying to set precedent in the D.C. Circuit for how judges ought to deal with an administration openly defying court orders—and exploring the tools available to the judiciary when the Executive branch won’t prosecute a criminal referral against itself.


Why they’re doing this:

The Trump administration knows that the Supreme Court won’t let a Cabinet secretary be dragged into court to testify. (She may file an affidavit, as she’s already done in this litigation.)

So the only recourse here is to pierce executive and/or attorney-client privilege.

Cristian Farias (@cristianfarias.com) 2025-11-26T11:55:32.266Z

This is not throwing Kristi Noem under the bus. This is a designed to insulate from judicial scrutiny any and all high-level communications about how the decision to defy a court order was made.

The Trump administration is trying to shut this inquiry down.

Cristian Farias (@cristianfarias.com) 2025-11-26T13:03:04.393Z

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Trump administration knows that the Supreme Court won't let a Cabinet secretary be dragged into court to testify 🧵 (Original Post) In It to Win It Wednesday OP
Helpful fashion tip: tanyev Wednesday #1
She is a despicable hack. spanone Wednesday #2

tanyev

(48,421 posts)
1. Helpful fashion tip:
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 08:44 AM
Wednesday
How to Tell if a Shirt is Too Small

3. Horizontal Lines or Wrinkles

Horizontal lines or wrinkles can appear around the bust, waist, or back when a shirt is too tight. These lines indicate that the fabric is being stretched beyond its intended capacity.

https://bacciinc.com/blogs/women-dress/how-to-tell-if-a-shirt-is-too-small-for-women?srsltid=AfmBOop0kYW_JN1tmAhEOFL6iTicCXgefprkbZQT0PlGCIwL-uJtAuo8


You’re welcome, Kristi.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Trump administration ...