Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Munu

(60 posts)
Sat Dec 27, 2025, 06:52 AM 11 hrs ago

Supreme Court blocks sending National Guard to Chicago and ...

Supreme Court Opens Door to 82nd Airborne in Chicago, Ex-Thomas Clerk Says
Newsweek

The U.S. Supreme Court's Tuesday decision against Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard in Illinois had the "unintended consequence" of potentially pushing the president to deploy active-duty military units instead, legal scholar John Yoo, who previously clerked for conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, said Wednesday.

"The unintended consequence here might be that the president is going to have to call the 82nd Airborne, or the Marines, or the 101st Airborne Division, as, for example, President Eisenhower did, after Brown v. Board of Education in the South to enforce desegregation," Yoo, the Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, said in an interview with Fox News.

"President Trump might have to do that first, in order to protect those federal buildings, those ice agents, and then, if they fail, he can then call out the National Guard," he said.

...


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court blocks sending National Guard to Chicago and ... (Original Post) Munu 11 hrs ago OP
Message auto-removed Name removed 11 hrs ago #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Munu 11 hrs ago #2
Message auto-removed Name removed 11 hrs ago #3
Welcome to du Emile 11 hrs ago #4
i don't think this consequence is unintended rampartd 10 hrs ago #5
Not surprised John Yoo would believe this, he authored the "Torture Memos." sop 10 hrs ago #6
"Oh no, not Yoo again!" yorkster 10 hrs ago #7
Well, if Pedo Trump deploys active duty military personnel Farmer-Rick 8 hrs ago #8

Response to Munu (Original post)

Response to Name removed (Reply #1)

Response to Munu (Reply #2)

rampartd

(3,634 posts)
5. i don't think this consequence is unintended
Sat Dec 27, 2025, 07:15 AM
10 hrs ago

edit deleted comment on the deleted poster. thanks to the jury on that one.

sop

(17,312 posts)
6. Not surprised John Yoo would believe this, he authored the "Torture Memos."
Sat Dec 27, 2025, 07:31 AM
10 hrs ago

Yoo was deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the DOJ when he wrote the Torture Memos, establishing the legality of detainee torture following the 9/11 attacks. Yoo wrote that "enhanced interrogation techniques" were not illegal and fell within the President's authority as commander-in-chief.

Farmer-Rick

(12,412 posts)
8. Well, if Pedo Trump deploys active duty military personnel
Sat Dec 27, 2025, 09:31 AM
8 hrs ago

To the liberal states he hates and the states with suck up weak little greedy Governors (That's you Lee) that then violates another law. Anyone ever hear about Posse Comitatus Act? Weird that the torture dude lawyer doesn't remember that law.

What's wrong with using the police in the states he wants to send troops into? The states have a large contingency of armed police. Why not use them to protect those federal buildings and ice agents?

Just because some president did it years ago doesn't mean you can do it to all 50 states to simply protect things the federal government has put in harms way. You know another president sent troops into the South to fight a war. Does it mean pedo Trump can do it now since we are NOT in a civil war?

Yoo sounds pretty stupid. He should be in jail right now. But that's looking backwards not forward.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court blocks send...