Coincidence? Yesterday was also statutory deadline for DOJ Epstein file update

[Tanuki]

Link to tweet

[Easterncedar]

1. Yep

[2naSalit]

2. Coinicidences...

Take a lot of planning, as Malcolm Nance would say.

[yellow dahlia]

17. Words of clarity,

from Nance.

[bucolic_frolic]

3. Slick Donnie Trump

[democrank]

4. Perhaps mainstream media will give the DOJ's deadline a casual mention.

Or maybe Fox “News” will offer a tough-question interview with Bondi.

[Botany]

5. Barb McQuade is very smart and knows her stuff

I always try to listen to what she is saying when she is on the TV machine.

She should have been A.G. not Garland.

[Rebl2]

14. Absolutely she

should have been. There were many others who would have been much better than Garland.

[Botany]

16. The Republicans installed Judge Cannon in Florida to protect Trump from his stealing top secrets and ...

… sending them to Russia crimes of which for the same crimes we executed 2 people called the
Rosenbergs and another FBI agent Robert Hansen died doing 15 consecutive life terms. But Trump
should have been in prison for multiple other crimes too then a packed Supreme Court protected him
and it then ruled that the 14th amendment article 3 did not say what it exactly said.

Trump should be in the Federal Super Maximum Prison in Colorado but the PTB protected and re-
installed him in order to do their nasty work including the theft of Venezuelan oil.

If McQuade was A.G. there would have been no way that she would have allowed the slow walking
of all the charges against him.

[yellow dahlia]

18. Agreed - on all counts.

[Botany]

19. When she talks smart people listen and for those that fear the truth they tremble.

It is no coincidence that on the day that the D. o. J. and the Trump Administration were supposed to
turn over the remaining Epstein documents that Trump invades Venezuela.

Malcom Nance, “Coincidence takes a lot of planning.”

[yellow dahlia]

20. That Malcolm Nance quote is spot on.

[Scrivener7]

6. Nope. Not a coincidence.

[Kaleva]

7. Is there any evidence to support the claim that the public's attention has been distracted?

[moniss]

8. I think the attempt is the point. nt

[Kaleva]

10. Is there any evidence to support that?

Or is it something that people want to believe?

[Kaleva]

11. Is there any evidence to support that?

Or is it something that people want to believe?

[druidity33]

21. Well you can look at the newspapers...

i see no Epstein articles on the Times site front page. Same with WaPo. Seems like just a couple of days ago it was top news...

[Kaleva]

22. That's the media. What about the public?

[druidity33]

23. Weelllll....

people tend to follow their news of choice. People are the "public" you know. I always think people are being obtuse (Triangular!) when they ignore the obvious to make a point. Are you triangular about this for some reason? What's the point you're trying to prove.... because i'm not seeing it.

[Kaleva]

25. So, have you been distracted?

[druidity33]

26. Yes...

"having one's thoughts or attention drawn away" So Yes,I have been distracted from the Epstein files release. What definition were you going by? Are you trying to prove some kind of point?

obtuse:
"difficult to comprehend : not clear or precise in thought or expression"

[Grim Chieftain]

9. The Epstein files must be explosive

Since he is going to extremes to distract from them and keep them hidden.

[sheshe2]

12. No!

[leftstreet]

13. DURec

[TBF]

15. Hard to believe that's a coincidence. nt

[Emile]

24. Are people still talking about Epstein?