Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moonshinegnomie

(3,881 posts)
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 05:21 PM Friday

he threatened grrenland again

denmark should shut down the us base we currently have there due to his threats and kick all us soldiers out of the country, the rest of europe should do the same.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/trump-greenland-military-denmark-nato.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ocelot II

(129,135 posts)
1. What's so ridiculous about Trump's demands is that the deal with Greenland/Denmark
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 05:30 PM
Friday

for the use of the military base that we have had since 1951 gives the US everything we need relative to military operations and national security.

[A]ccording to foreign policy experts, Danish officials have been baffled by Trump’s threats to resort to military intervention to gain control of Greenland because there’s already a long-standing agreement in place for the U.S. to increase its military presence there. In 1951, the U.S. and Denmark signed a little-known defense agreement allowing the U.S. “to improve and generally to fit the area for military use” in Greenland and “construct, install, maintain, and operate facilities and equipment” there.

“This agreement is very generous, it’s very open,” Mikkel Runge Olesen, a senior researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen, told Fortune. “The U.S. would be able to achieve almost any security goal that you can imagine under that agreement.”
....
Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen, citing the 1951 agreement, implored the Trump administration to stop his talk of taking over Greenland. “We already have a defense agreement between the Kingdom and the United States today, which gives the United States wide access to Greenland,” Frederiksen said in a statement over the weekend. “I would therefore strongly urge the United States to stop the threats against a historically close ally and against another country and another people who have said very clearly that they are not for sale.”
https://archive.is/KnrLV#selection-605.0-625.226

Disaffected

(6,168 posts)
2. It's not about national security,
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 05:46 PM
Friday

it is more about land, minerals and Trump's megalomania (and Epstein of course).

Ocelot II

(129,135 posts)
3. Bingo. The national security argument is a smokescreen.
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 05:50 PM
Friday

He wants that big island on the Mercator projection map (3x its actual size) to show up as part of the United States.

The Madcap

(1,758 posts)
4. Unless we fill the air with more exhaust and coal pollution,
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 05:57 PM
Friday

The earth won't warm fast enough for the glaciers to melt before he dies. Maybe that's the plan. He wants to own it, melt it, and mine it....

SheilaAnn

(10,636 posts)
6. Rename Greenland "Epsteinland" and he won't mention it again." Saw earlier either on DU or FB, I laughed.
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 08:38 PM
Friday
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»he threatened grrenland a...