Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wicked Blue

(8,488 posts)
Thu Jan 15, 2026, 11:53 AM 21 hrs ago

When They're Not Applying Banned Chokeholds, ICE Agents Are Apparently Stealing and Selling Citizens' Phones

"The immigration agents in this account are effectively operating as something like federally sanctioned highwaymen–they might as well be privateers in tactical vests and masks"

By Jim Vorel | January 14, 2026 | 11:38am

In late October, a Houston-area 10th grader, 16-year-old U.S. citizen Arnoldo Bazan, watched his father tackled, choked and arrested in public by immigration officials who the teenager said refused to identify themselves and wore no official uniforms or insignia. Arnoldo Bazan was treated much the same: Put into a banned chokehold by whoever these purported law enforcement figures were supposed to be, he was beaten and choked, and had his phone confiscated, despite his pleas that he was underage and a citizen. His treatment at the hands of agents was later justified by professional murder-rationalizer and DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, who claimed that he had “assaulted” officers during the arrest by hitting one with an elbow, capping her statement with the following, incredibly smug flourish: “The federal law enforcement officer graciously chose not to press charges.”

This story is of course heinous in and of itself, but also typical to the experience of countless Americans who have had their families torn apart by the “immigration enforcement” campaign of DHS and ICE. If you asked Arnoldo Bazan, then surely he would cite the loss of his father Arnulfo Bazan Carrillo that day in October (he was eventually deported to Mexico) as the most important and gutting detail of the encounter. But when the 16-year-old’s case resurfaced this week in the context of a ProPublica deep dive into the widespread use of banned chokeholds by immigration agents, there was another detail that stood out as particularly galling in its sheer disregard for the idea that agents might face any kinds of consequences: The fact that the ICE agents in question allegedly sold Arnoldo Bazan’s confiscated phone for cash, potentially on the very same day that they took it from him.

In the midst of ProPublica’s investigation and interviews with Arnoldo, the teen explained that he had filmed much of the incident between the ICE agents and his father, who had been driving him to high school when they stopped at a McDonald’s for breakfast. There, federal agents swarmed the Bazans’ vehicle, causing them to flee. The two fled on foot into a restaurant supply store, where agents tackled them and began to choke both. This portion of the incident was partially captured on video by bystanders, and Arnoldo Bazan can be heard pleading and crying as officers constrict his throat, hoarsely saying “I’m underage” and “I was going to school!” He later described the scenario as feeling “like I was going to pass out and die.” It’s little wonder he gave not much thought to his phone at the time, but after being returned to his home hours later, he used the Find My tool to locate where it had ended up–at “a vending machine for used electronics miles away, close to an ICE detention center,” according to ProPublica. Seemingly, he was able to somehow visit this location and retrieve the phone–the publication said it had later seen the footage, which “backed the family’s account of the chase.”

Just consider, for a moment, the thought process of the immigration agents making this kind of decision. You detain a man under the suspicion of being an illegal immigrant, and brutalize both him and his teenage son who is on his way to high school. You take the phone that the kid is using to record the experience–prior to when you start choking him, that is. One would expect there to be some kind of lip service here about how the phone was being taken for “evidence” or “investigation,” or in greater likelihood the thought that perhaps it can be wiped of any incriminating evidence. Nevertheless, if a federal agent takes your phone from you, do you not expect for them to hang onto it in some kind of official capacity? Maybe to even return your property to you afterward, if you’re really lucky? One thing I’m pretty certain isn’t in the operations manual: Bringing your phone to a kiosk, to sell for cash, and then pocketing the modest payday.

https://www.jezebel.com/ice-immigration-phone-theft-sold-arnoldo-bazan-houston-chokeholds-private-property
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When They're Not Applying Banned Chokeholds, ICE Agents Are Apparently Stealing and Selling Citizens' Phones (Original Post) Wicked Blue 21 hrs ago OP
Armed robbery Bayard 20 hrs ago #1
When will someone indict one of these bastards CanonRay 19 hrs ago #14
Cars and credit cards are next dalton99a 20 hrs ago #2
No one's stopping them n/t leftstreet 20 hrs ago #3
+1. Thievery and looting with anonymity and immunity. dalton99a 20 hrs ago #5
MN must not have governing bodies leftstreet 20 hrs ago #7
Post rec orangecrush 19 hrs ago #10
When you attract violence, you get violence in return. Initech 20 hrs ago #4
Also, when you hire criminals Wicked Blue 20 hrs ago #6
Ronny Chieng nailed it the other day. Initech 20 hrs ago #8
Rec progressoid 19 hrs ago #12
Criminals gonna crime orangecrush 19 hrs ago #9
Common thugs, thieves, deplorables malaise 19 hrs ago #11
This is nothing new... GiqueCee 19 hrs ago #13
I have a few questions for professional murder-rationalizer and DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, Martin Eden 19 hrs ago #15
Message auto-removed Name removed 19 hrs ago #16
You aren't as smart as you think you are obamanut2012 18 hrs ago #17
Message auto-removed Name removed 18 hrs ago #19
You. Are. That. sarisataka 18 hrs ago #18

Bayard

(28,718 posts)
1. Armed robbery
Thu Jan 15, 2026, 01:16 PM
20 hrs ago

Notice they don't ask either father or son for ID. No Miranda rights either--seems to be long since gone in this terrorism age.

leftstreet

(38,959 posts)
7. MN must not have governing bodies
Thu Jan 15, 2026, 01:26 PM
20 hrs ago

No Governor, Mayor, Attorney General, Sec of State. No state assemblies

How sad

GiqueCee

(3,456 posts)
13. This is nothing new...
Thu Jan 15, 2026, 02:19 PM
19 hrs ago

... has everyone forgotten that Civil Asset Forfeiture is a real thing? It is also a blatant violation of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Law enforcement has NO right to confiscate personal property with no warrant ever being sought, or charges ever being brought, and absent any conviction of a crime. And then they refuse to return it without prohibitively costly "legal" procedures that often exceed the value of the property that was seized. The police forces usually turn stolen property into cash, and make no mistake, it IS stolen property.
Civil Asset Forfeiture has no right to exist; it is irrefutably unconstitutional.

Martin Eden

(15,382 posts)
15. I have a few questions for professional murder-rationalizer and DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin,
Thu Jan 15, 2026, 02:40 PM
19 hrs ago

... who claimed that 16 year-old Arnoldo Bazan had “assaulted” officers during the arrest by hitting one with an elbow, capping her statement with the following, incredibly smug flourish: “The federal law enforcement officer graciously chose not to press charges.”

1. Can you describe the injury sustained by the officer Arnoldo Bazan allegedly struck with his elbow?

2. What medical treatment did the officer receive for his injury?

3. Given that this 16 year-old US citizen was beaten, choked, and robbed of his cell phone, shouldn't he be the one pressing charges?

Response to Wicked Blue (Original post)

Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #17)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When They're Not Applying...