Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Supreme Court appears reluctant to let Trump fire Fed's Lisa Cook
WASHINGTON, Jan 21 (Reuters) - Conservative and liberal U.S. Supreme Court justices signaled skepticism on Wednesday toward President Donald Trump's bid to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook in a case with the central bank's independence at stake.
During about two hours of arguments in the case, the justices indicated they were unlikely to grant the Trump administration's request to lift a judge's decision barring the Republican president from immediately firing Cook while her legal challenge continues to play out.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Some of the justices pressed D. John Sauer, the U.S. solicitor general arguing for Trump's administration, about why Cook was not given a chance to formally respond to the unproven mortgage fraud allegations - which she has denied - that the president cited as justification to oust Cook. They also raised concerns about the effect on the economy of such a first-ever presidential firing from the central bank and the implications for the Fed's cherished independence from political influence.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-considers-trumps-bid-fire-feds-lisa-cook-2026-01-21/
During about two hours of arguments in the case, the justices indicated they were unlikely to grant the Trump administration's request to lift a judge's decision barring the Republican president from immediately firing Cook while her legal challenge continues to play out.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Some of the justices pressed D. John Sauer, the U.S. solicitor general arguing for Trump's administration, about why Cook was not given a chance to formally respond to the unproven mortgage fraud allegations - which she has denied - that the president cited as justification to oust Cook. They also raised concerns about the effect on the economy of such a first-ever presidential firing from the central bank and the implications for the Fed's cherished independence from political influence.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-considers-trumps-bid-fire-feds-lisa-cook-2026-01-21/
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Supreme Court appears reluctant to let Trump fire Fed's Lisa Cook (Original Post)
demmiblue
21 hrs ago
OP
Those 6 judges could lose a lot of money if our federal reserve falls apart with inexperienced fed governor
kimbutgar
21 hrs ago
#1
If they let him fire one, he will fire them all. No more reasons needed. /nt
bucolic_frolic
21 hrs ago
#4
kimbutgar
(26,932 posts)1. Those 6 judges could lose a lot of money if our federal reserve falls apart with inexperienced fed governor
Appointed by a man who only cares about himself.
Initech
(107,685 posts)6. And you know Trump is just itching to fire them if they don't comply.
Because he is that fucking insane and has been illegally usurping power.
Tadpole Raisin
(1,970 posts)2. They care about doing the right thing only if they would be
adversely impacted by siding with the Felon in Chief.
bluestarone
(21,378 posts)3. Well, if they know that have to rule against TSF, they will
STALL as long as they can.
bucolic_frolic
(54,232 posts)4. If they let him fire one, he will fire them all. No more reasons needed. /nt
maxrandb
(17,206 posts)5. Sure Jan
this court will find some weasly way to fire the African American lady, but none of the white guys.
I am sure Sammy can find some obscure "Realm of the King" proclamation from before slaves were citizens, and "Pubic Hair Clare" will quote something about reverse racism, or site that in 1913, women couldn't vote, let alone serve as a Fed Governor.
They'll be sure to word it in a way that it "only applies to this particular case".
UTUSN
(77,140 posts)7. Will wait till it's over.