Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(21,974 posts)
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:25 PM 12 hrs ago

Trump Blurts Out Real Reason for Insurrection Act Threat--and It's Dark

Trump Blurts Out Real Reason for Insurrection Act Threat—and It’s Dark

Greg Sargent/
January 21, 2026
RICH FANTASY LIFE

He thinks it lets him abuse his power however he wants. It’s up to the courts—and the American people—to show him otherwise.

https://newrepublic.com/article/205504/trump-insurrection-act-threat-courts

Do President Trump’s advisers actively want him to act like a dictator? At the very least, there’s plainly a deep split inside Trumpworld on this question. As deranged as it seems, one faction clearly believes Trump absolutely should project unconstrained tyrannical power, to frighten ordinary voters and institutions into compliance, while another faction thinks acting like a Mad King risks a huge electoral rebuke and, by extension, that normal political patterns still apply.

You can see this tension in Trump’s ugly new comments about invoking the Insurrection Act, which would empower him to use the military for domestic law enforcement. Lately he’s suggested that he might not invoke it after all. And in an interview flagged by Aaron Rupar, Trump said this again.

Asked if he sees the act as “necessary,” Trump said: “I don’t think it is yet. It might be at some point.” Trump added that other presidents have invoked it, and said: “It does make life a lot easier. You don’t go through the court system. It’s just a much easier thing to do.”

Emphasis added. Trump seems to think invoking the Insurrection Act means he’s no longer constrained by the courts. That’s nonsense. Yes, the act would allow him to deploy the military to carry out things that “law enforcement” (a grotesque misnomer for ICE) is doing in places like Minneapolis amid his immigration crackdown. And given that Trump has already sanctioned extraordinary abuses of power—detentions of U.S. citizens, warrantless arrests, excessive violence against protesters, including the occasional killing—empowering the military to do all this is an unsettling prospect.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Blurts Out Real Reason for Insurrection Act Threat--and It's Dark (Original Post) Miles Archer 12 hrs ago OP
Not so much dark as it is stupid SSJVegeta 12 hrs ago #1
We've seen what he does when he thinks something is true. Qutzupalotl 11 hrs ago #2
I've got a better explanation ..... E-P-S-T-E-I-N groundloop 11 hrs ago #3
Let us be clear. In the lifetimes of 80% of Americans, Bluetus 11 hrs ago #4
I don't know which is worse -- Trmp's obvious dishonesty, corruption, and cruelty, or the clear evidence that he ... eppur_se_muova 9 hrs ago #5
November could be another log on that fire Ruby the Liberal 36 min ago #6

SSJVegeta

(2,430 posts)
1. Not so much dark as it is stupid
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:27 PM
12 hrs ago

Which in turn results in something dark because stupid shit like this is never supposed to be a reality.


...one would think

Qutzupalotl

(15,684 posts)
2. We've seen what he does when he thinks something is true.
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:56 PM
11 hrs ago

He acts as though it were true, gets people to accept it, and people just bow and scrape at every step, and give him what he wants. Example: presidential immunity.

The courts can stop him, but often after much damage has been done. Example: the East Wing.

My point is, if he thinks he can do whatever he wants because blah blah Article II, he will try, and that makes him especially dangerous.

groundloop

(13,585 posts)
3. I've got a better explanation ..... E-P-S-T-E-I-N
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 10:40 PM
11 hrs ago

When's the last time there was a new story about tRump's involvement with Epstein? Or the fact that 99% of the legally required release of the "Epstein files" has not happened?

Bluetus

(2,367 posts)
4. Let us be clear. In the lifetimes of 80% of Americans,
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 10:50 PM
11 hrs ago

the Insurrection Act has only been used 3 times. All three were at the explicit request of Governors. Two were due to instability following weather disasters, and the third was the LA Riots after the Rodney King beating.

To find a case where the President used it without a Governor's request, you have to go back to the 1960s where Eisenhower and Kennedy used it to enforce the federal desegregation laws.

eppur_se_muova

(41,132 posts)
5. I don't know which is worse -- Trmp's obvious dishonesty, corruption, and cruelty, or the clear evidence that he ...
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 12:06 AM
9 hrs ago

just doesn't know what he's doing the overwhelming majority of the time.

He just makes lots of threats, notes which ones get a reaction, and tosses out some new ones. No principles, no policies, no plans, just announcing whatever the Hell he feels like will get him attention on any given day.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,613 posts)
6. November could be another log on that fire
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:14 AM
36 min ago

My blood about ran cold watching his reaction to Zelenskyy explaining that their constitution puts elections 'on hold' if the country is at war.

trump was pretty amped up about this. Since we don't do that by statute, Lord knows he was going to find something to justify this line of manufactured bullshit.

Venezuela, Greenland, Canada, ICEholes triggering a civil war - he's throwing everything at it, IMO.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump Blurts Out Real Rea...