General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNASA is about to send people to the moon -- in a spacecraft not everyone thinks is safe to fly
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/23/science/artemis-2-orion-capsule-heat-shieldThe issue relates to a special coating applied to the bottom part of the spacecraft, called the heat shield. Its a crucial piece of hardware designed to protect the astronauts from extreme temperatures as theyre descending back to Earth during the final stretch of their moon-bound mission called Artemis II.
This vital part of the Orion spacecraft is nearly identical to the heat shield flown on Artemis I, an uncrewed 2022 test flight. That prior missions Orion vehicle returned from space with a heat shield pockmarked by unexpected damage prompting NASA to investigate the issue.
And while NASA is poised to clear the heat shield for flight, even those who believe the mission is safe acknowledge there is unknown risk involved.
-snip-
Much more at the link.
From Futurism:
https://futurism.com/space/experts-warn-moon-rocket-nasa-heat-shield
Camarda has since teamed up with several other NASA research scientists, calling on the agency to heed their warnings.
We could have solved this problem way back when, he told the broadcaster. Instead, they keep kicking the can down the road.
-snip-
The reason this is such a big deal is that when the heat shield is spalling or you have big chunks coming off even if the vehicle isnt destroyed, youre right at the point of incipient failure now, thermal protection materials expert and NASA veteran Dan Rasky told CNN. Its like youre at the edge of the cliff on a foggy day.
Deuxcents
(25,733 posts)They all died because of malfunctioning equipment
Ocelot II
(129,511 posts)Kaleva
(40,252 posts)highplainsdem
(60,486 posts)DavidDvorkin
(20,508 posts)This is the height of irresponsibility.
Volaris
(11,437 posts)There will be hell to pay like they haven't seen YET.
Disaffected
(6,211 posts)heat shields are decades old technology - why are they having issues with it. Same for leaky valves.
JT45242
(3,888 posts)They all said that the largest difference between NASA and the Soviet space agency is that was cautious with human life and valued it. They knew everything would be on live TV and a catastrophic failure or death could mean the end of the agency. They were valued as scientists and people.
In the Soviet Union, cosmonauts were treated as expendible crew members like red shirts on original Star Trek. If they died, no one cared.
This sounds dangerously close to that reality.
Xavier Breath
(6,527 posts)Jack Valentino
(4,509 posts)Maybe the aliens camped on the dark side of the moon would
'take care of a problem' which we have been unable to solve.....
SocialDemocrat61
(7,065 posts)
hunter
(40,407 posts)Now it's just "Hold my beer."
My grandfather was an Apollo Project engineer. He made a few bits of metal for those spacecraft and I've got his Apollo 8 medallion and other memorabilia.
Nevertheless, I think robots are sophisticated enough these days that there is no good reason to send humans into space and probably never will be.