Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGuardian "Latest ChatGPT model uses Elon Musk's Grokipedia as source, tests reveal"
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_OtherThe latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musks Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.
In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions. These included queries on political structures in Iran, such as salaries of the Basij paramilitary force and the ownership of the Mostazafan Foundation, and questions on the biography of Sir Richard Evans, a British historian and expert witness against Holocaust denier David Irving in his libel trial.
Grokipedia, launched in October, is an AI-generated online encyclopedia that aims to compete with Wikipedia, and which has been criticised for propagating rightwing narratives on topics including gay marriage and the 6 January insurrection in the US. Unlike Wikipedia, it does not allow direct human editing, instead an AI model writes content and responds to requests for changes.
Snip
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guardian "Latest ChatGPT model uses Elon Musk's Grokipedia as source, tests reveal" (Original Post)
NewHendoLib
3 hrs ago
OP
Klarkashton
(4,884 posts)1. The whole thing is a stupid worthless mess.
There is nothing to prevent exponential positive feedback of complete shit content.
SheltieLover
(77,651 posts)2. Precisely why repukes are so in love with it.
Klarkashton
(4,884 posts)3. It's a monster that can't be moderated
SheltieLover
(77,651 posts)4. Should be illegal!
Klarkashton
(4,884 posts)5. The only thing that is considered illegal anymore
Is opposing this fed govt.
SheltieLover
(77,651 posts)7. Who knew a ruskie ASSet in wh would be problematic?
highplainsdem
(60,486 posts)6. This is insane. The AI bros are doing such incredible damage.