Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums25-Years ago today; 25 January 2001. Remember this?
While fighting two wars that he won, fighting off a hostile Republican Congress that desperately wanted to impeach him, Bill Clinton still managed an economy that brought annual surpluses to the national economy. For the first time in decades the deficit was in minus territory and the debt going down - because Clinton ordered the surplus be applied to the debt.
On the FOURTH DAY of our "MBA president's" first term, this fucking guy no less:
"The time has come, in my judgment, to consider a budgetary strategy that is consistent with a preemptive smoothing of the glide path to zero federal debt or, more realistically, to the level of federal debt that is an effective irreducible minimum.'' - Alan Greenspan, in Senate testimony, Jan. 25, 2001.
Translation: Go ahead and cut taxes. Surpluses are bad! Endless surpluses were an economic danger to the nation's very survival!
Greenspan and the GOP said we needed to prevent the horror of having too much fucking money! Cuz' next thing you know, the government would have zero fucking debt and we'd be socking away all that extra money by buying private sector financial assets - "Soshilism!!!" And besides, those damn big-government liberals will just blow the money on new government programs, like education, hunger, health care, housing, etc.
But, no. THE FIRST legislation proposed by the Bush II administration was this bill to cut taxes.
Projections by Republicans and the Bush administration then saw of surpluses of $5.6 trillion over 10 years. Within MONTHS that outlook in 2001 quickly turned into estimated deficits of at least $1.4 trillion and possibly as much as $5 trillion.
Isn't that adorable??? $5-Trillion! Remind me what the deficits were during the Bush II administration. And what they aretoday...
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
25-Years ago today; 25 January 2001. Remember this? (Original Post)
Grins
6 hrs ago
OP
Arguing over taxes and surpluses seems like a quaint dream from a bygone era.
Xavier Breath
6 hrs ago
#1
Xavier Breath
(6,534 posts)1. Arguing over taxes and surpluses seems like a quaint dream from a bygone era.
Sigh.
Dawson Leery
(19,542 posts)2. Democrats always have to fight on an unlevel playing field.
UpInArms
(54,228 posts)3. it was a $16 trillion transfer of wealth
the war was "off budget"
and then, they destroyed the economy and handed the tatters to Obama, who was blamed for it all