Mark Hamill: Airlines will not show this to prevent walkouts.

[highplainsdem]

Airlines will not show this to prevent walkouts.

— Mark Hamill (@markhamillofficial.bsky.social) 2026-01-27T21:12:12.291Z

[Ilsa]

1. A Reply on BlueSky:

— Debby Williams 💙♐️ (@dwilliams1210.com) 2026-01-27T21:14:50.467Z

[highplainsdem]

5. That was done with an unethical, illegally trained AI image generator, and every use of those AI

tools is a thumbs-up for the AI bros allied with Trump and their theft of intellectual property.

[Ilsa]

10. How can I tell it's not an old fashioned photoshop?

Really, I can't tell the difference between photoshop and AI. Am I supposed to assume everything is AI?

[highplainsdem]

13. Look at it. Do you think someone using Photoshop would intentionally give some of those jackets

a double hood, with one up and one down?

[KPN]

20. I don't see sny with 2 hoods. I see s lot with the hood down,

some with a hat on, at least one with a hoodie hood up. Any other tells? That one doesn’t convince me.

I live in coastal Oregon where people wear rainwear all the time with hood down if it’s not pouring , and some with a hat or hoodie under the rainwear with the hood up (me, for example, often if I’m out in the rain for just a couple minutes) even if its pouring.

[Callie1979]

27. You need to watch "Diaper diplomacy". AI babies giving trump speeches.

Its Hilarious because the speeches make more sense coming from a fake baby's mouth

[highplainsdem]

29. It's all AI slop, unethical, and sending the message that the AI user is fine with intellectual property theft

and every other harm caused by AI.

It's stupid and sleazy fake creativity by no-talent and ethics-free wannabes.

[ColoringFool]

32. Wow. And Here I Thought It Was A Trenchant Mockery Of Film And....

Subject.

[highplainsdem]

34. A simple photo of the back of that jacket, or just quoting the words,

would have been an equally effective mockery, and without using an AI tool trained on millions of stolen images.

By using AI, the message sent was "I really don't care about the theft of artists' work and how badly they've been hurt."

[Callie1979]

38. Not sure how it's unethical if there's no way it could be seen as real.

You probably aren't a fan of "bad lip reading' either.

[highplainsdem]

42. It's unethical because that tech works only because of the theft of the world's intellectual property.

That fundamental problem with genAI has nothing to do with whether what it's used for is a deepfake.

[highplainsdem]

14. And btw, there are a lot of artists on Bluesky who will immediately block anyone they see posting

AI slop.

They're all or mostly liberals, but they hate AI slop and everything it represents.

See these Bluesky responses to a union president who thoughtlessly posted AI slop:

American Federation of Teachers president thought AI slop would be "fun" to share on Bluesky. Big mistake.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220895596

If you support unions (DUers should) but still think it's OK to post AI slop, see the hundreds of Bluesky replies
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220895856

[popsdenver]

21. then we will just have to bombard

the Republicans with excellent political cartoons.........but sometimes the cartoonists go soft, like Doonesbury for instance, or maybe it is because of pressure from the Republican Oligarch owned newspapers that will only let him get by with just a little bit of ribbing......

[niyad]

19. Poorly done, whatever it was. The colour is wrong, and the material

in her $39 jacket was matte, not shiny, plus the hood covered part of the lettering..

[highplainsdem]

24. That Bluesky user is fond of posting AI slop. I saw other examples.

[niyad]

35. You are much better informed than I about this. Since I am not on bluesky,

I cannot report such people.

[ColoringFool]

33. So....It Wasn't Enough Of A Copy?

[rampartd]

6. perfect!

[Joinfortmill]

37. If you really wanted to just give the original poster a headsup...

about an AI issue, you could private message them. But, no, you choose public embarrassment instead. What does that make you?

[Ilsa]

39. I'm really not embarassed by my lack of exposure

to the details of AI. I haven't had much time to devote to it.

I wrote this reply to you not knowing the firestorm of post above yours.

I hadn't considered that art or copyrighted material may or may not be involved. I didn't see anything around it at the source.

Thank you for alerting me that my ignorance might be embarrassing or offensive. I'll try harder.

[Joinfortmill]

41. My post wasn't meant for you. It was meant for Highplainsdem for being a meany. Got caught in the wrong thread.

[efhmc]

2. Just that side shot of her looks creepy.

[newdeal2]

8. Maybe they can reboot it as a horror flick

Sort of like M3GAN

[Ilsa]

9. She has squinty alien eyes.

No wonder she creeps us out.

/revision/latest?cb=20121127223113

[niyad]

16. That look is deliberate rresult of surgery. Her eyes looked normal

when she first got here.

[QueerDuck]

23. Then she had kidney surgery.

[popsdenver]

18. Seriously

her eyes are incredibly DEMONIC..........If you were her kid, all it would take is "one of those looks" to paralyze you.....

[paleotn]

17. She looks creepy from any direction.

She is creepy. Like some kind of Transylvania ghoul.

And hopefully deported at some point in the future. Her and her whole damn family.

[3catwoman3]

30. She's a Slovenian ghoul.

[Farmer-Rick]

26. Is it just me

Or does her head look too big for her body? I think they photoshopped her body, to make her look thinner. But left that weird alien big head alone.

Her proportions seem way off from normal head to body ratios.

[niyad]

36. Well, she is tall, even without those sky-high stilettos.

[lapfog_1]

3. LOL

Walkouts at 33,000 feet. Yup.

[Coventina]

7. Bring a parachute just in case.

(I understand that parachutes don't really work at that elevation, but it's a joke.)

[dickthegrouch]

15. I'd find an airlock to walk out of if subjected to that! /nt

[Ilsa]

4. Gossip from film insiders:

Another source who spoke to Rolling Stone suggested almost two-thirds of the crew who worked on the film in New York had requested their name be pulled from the credits of the documentary.

A third anonymous source who worked on Melania said, "I feel a little bit uncomfortable with the propaganda element of this. But Brett Ratner was the worst part of working on this project."
https://www.rawstory.com/melania-trump-doc/#

Brett Ratner was subject to a number of sexual assault and harassment allegations in 2017.

[progressoid]

12. I've never been so desperate for work that I'd agree to work on such a project.

Also, Ratner is an horrible person. In addition to the sexual assaults, he's also friendly with Netanyahu.

[FakeNoose]

25. THAT - I believe! The film community is small enough in NY

Most of them know each other, at least by reputation. Most of the "artsy-craftsy" folks in NY vote D, so they'd be embarrassed if word ever got out that they worked on this druck. I guess that's also true of the artsy people in California too. Take the paycheck but not the film credit.

[Rhiagel]

11. The barf bags expense would be astronomical.

It would bankrupt all airlines.

[Fil1957]

22. People would leave the plane...while it's in the air!

[miyazaki]

28. Is it rated R for nudity? nt

[3catwoman3]

31. We saw an ad for it tonite, on MS Now of all places...

...and it's rated PG, so none of her "modeling" (aka soft porn) photos.

[Ilsa]

40. I guess it's PG vs G because of the pedophiles in the movie.

Or their enablers. Or both.