General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTop Trump nemesis goes directly after James Comer: 'You want this fight -- let's have it'
By David Edwards
Published February 5, 2026 9:51AM ET
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dared House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) to hold her and former President Bill Clinton's testimony on sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in public.
After the couple requested that the hearing be public, Comer announced that he would hold depositions behind closed doors in late February.
"Once it became clear that the House of Representatives would hold them in contempt, the Clintons completely caved and will appear for transcribed, filmed depositions this month," Comer said recently.
https://www.rawstory.com/clinton-comer-epstein-fight/
Baitball Blogger
(51,894 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(176,610 posts)Republican Rep. James Comer opened a door that has long been closed. His party might come to regret the decision.
As Clintons prepare to answer questions about Epstein, Trump balks
— Mike Walker (@newnarrative.bsky.social) 2026-02-05T19:34:10.950Z
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/as-clintons-prepare-to-answer-questions-about-epstein-trump-balks
So lets stop the games, Hillary Clinton added. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, lets have it in public. You love to talk about transparency. Theres nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on. We will be there.
The hapless committee chairman hasnt yet responded, but in the meantime, theres also a larger context to all of this. The New York Times reported that no former president has ever been compelled to testify to Congress under subpoena, and Comer has set a precedent his party might ultimately come to regret.
Members of Congress dont necessarily think that is a good thing; they want the ability to bring in former presidents when they are relevant witnesses and may have something meaningful to say. And Mr. Comers move was a rare power play by a Republican lawmaker at a time when the G.O.P.-led House and Senate have ceded much of their power to the White House.
But his accomplishment also amounted to a remarkable use of government power to target a political adversary the kind seen more often in autocratic societies where a peaceful transfer of power is not a given because leaders fear ending up in prison after leaving office. And it was one that some experts said further chipped away at the countrys democratic norms.
Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, told the Times that like all powers of Congress or any other branch, these are powers that can be abused. Were living in a period of spectacular abuse of power......
It was against this backdrop that NBC News Tom Llamas reminded the incumbent president: Democrats are already saying if you bring President Bill Clinton and he has to testify, were bringing President Trump. Before the anchor could finish his question about this, Trump interjected.
Well, I think they might say that, you know? But theyve already brought me. See, Ive been brought, the president replied. They had me indicted, many, many times. Many, many times.
Like so many of the presidents comments, this didnt make any sense at all congressional Democrats had nothing to do with the many criminal charges Trump has faced though the response suggested hes not at all eager to answer questions about Epstein, even if subpoenaed in future years, and even if the Clintons cooperate.
trump may be worried about being called before congress after his term is up. I personally do not believe that trump will survive to the end of his term in order to be forced to testify. trump may be worried because he cannot conceive of dying