Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(27,205 posts)
Thu Feb 5, 2026, 10:04 AM 11 hrs ago

Top Trump nemesis goes directly after James Comer: 'You want this fight -- let's have it'

By David Edwards
Published February 5, 2026 9:51AM ET

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dared House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) to hold her and former President Bill Clinton's testimony on sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in public.

After the couple requested that the hearing be public, Comer announced that he would hold depositions behind closed doors in late February.

"Once it became clear that the House of Representatives would hold them in contempt, the Clintons completely caved and will appear for transcribed, filmed depositions this month," Comer said recently.

https://www.rawstory.com/clinton-comer-epstein-fight/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top Trump nemesis goes directly after James Comer: 'You want this fight -- let's have it' (Original Post) turbinetree 11 hrs ago OP
Comer may have said so, but did the Clintons agree to it? Baitball Blogger 11 hrs ago #1
MaddowBlog-As Clintons prepare to answer questions about Epstein, Trump balks LetMyPeopleVote 2 hrs ago #2

LetMyPeopleVote

(176,610 posts)
2. MaddowBlog-As Clintons prepare to answer questions about Epstein, Trump balks
Thu Feb 5, 2026, 07:02 PM
2 hrs ago

Republican Rep. James Comer opened a door that has long been closed. His party might come to regret the decision.

As Clintons prepare to answer questions about Epstein, Trump balks

www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Mike Walker (@newnarrative.bsky.social) 2026-02-05T19:34:10.950Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/as-clintons-prepare-to-answer-questions-about-epstein-trump-balks

It’s never been altogether clear why Rep. James Comer, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, launched a crusade to get Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify as part of his panel’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation. But the Kentucky Republican did it anyway, even issuing first-of-their-kind subpoenas to compel the Democrats’ testimony.....

“So let’s stop the games,” Hillary Clinton added. “If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it — in public. You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on. We will be there.”

The hapless committee chairman hasn’t yet responded, but in the meantime, there’s also a larger context to all of this. The New York Times reported that no former president has ever been compelled to testify to Congress under subpoena, and Comer has set a precedent his party might ultimately come to regret.

Members of Congress don’t necessarily think that is a good thing; they want the ability to bring in former presidents when they are relevant witnesses and may have something meaningful to say. And Mr. Comer’s move was a rare power play by a Republican lawmaker at a time when the G.O.P.-led House and Senate have ceded much of their power to the White House.

But his accomplishment also amounted to a remarkable use of government power to target a political adversary — the kind seen more often in autocratic societies where a peaceful transfer of power is not a given because leaders fear ending up in prison after leaving office. And it was one that some experts said further chipped away at the country’s democratic norms.


Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, told the Times that “like all powers of Congress or any other branch, these are powers that can be abused. We’re living in a period of spectacular abuse of power.”.....

It was against this backdrop that NBC News’ Tom Llamas reminded the incumbent president: “Democrats are already saying if you bring President Bill Clinton and he has to testify, we’re bringing President Trump.” Before the anchor could finish his question about this, Trump interjected.

“Well, I think they might say that, you know? But they’ve already brought me. See, I’ve been brought,” the president replied. “They had me indicted, many, many times. Many, many times.”

Like so many of the president’s comments, this didn’t make any sense at all — congressional Democrats had nothing to do with the many criminal charges Trump has faced — though the response suggested he’s not at all eager to answer questions about Epstein, even if subpoenaed in future years, and even if the Clintons cooperate.

trump may be worried about being called before congress after his term is up. I personally do not believe that trump will survive to the end of his term in order to be forced to testify. trump may be worried because he cannot conceive of dying
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top Trump nemesis goes di...