Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drray23

(8,640 posts)
Thu Feb 5, 2026, 10:29 PM 18 hrs ago

So this is what Tulsi was up to and likely what the whistleblower complaint is about.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence obtained voting machines from Puerto Rico and probed them for security vulnerabilities, the office said in a statement to CNN Wednesday.

The extraordinary move comes amid Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s broader search for voter fraud at the behest of President Donald Trump, who has falsely claimed that the 2020 election was rigged despite numerous court rulings and audits debunking the claim. Gabbard was present as FBI agents executed a search warrant in Fulton County, Georgia, last week related to the 2020 election.

The ODNI claimed in its statement to have found “extremely concerning” cybersecurity and operational deployment practices with the voting machines in Puerto Rico but did not provide detailed evidence.

The US attorney in Puerto Rico, Homeland Security Investigations agents and an FBI supervisory special agent “facilitated the voluntary turnover of electronic voting hardware and software to ODNI for analysis,” an ODNI spokesperson said. It’s unclear exactly when the agency received and studied the voting machines.

In justifying the voting equipment probe, the ODNI cited “publicly reported claims relating to elections in Puerto Rico alleging discrepancies and systemic anomalies in their electronic voting systems.”

David Becker, the executive director of a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works with election officials, told CNN that voting machines are subject to regular testing and a strict chain of custody. The machines count paper ballots that are audited and recounted to confirm the machine counts. Those are all security controls that have proven effective, he said.

The director of national intelligence coordinates intelligence from across the 17 other organizations in the US intelligence community. It is unprecedented for the ODNI to play such a hands-on role in election infrastructure, former intelligence officials and election experts told CNN.

“This is well beyond what ODNI has the authority or expertise to do,” a former senior US intelligence official who has worked on election security told CNN Wednesday in reaction to the ODNI statement. “This is amateur hour.”



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/intelligence-director-tulsi-gabbard-s-office-obtained-and-tested-voting-machines-in-puerto-rico/ar-AA1VHvJf?uxmode=ruby&ocid=edgntpruby&pc=W226&cvid=69855ca72c7d41229ae597e033db7c05&ei=19
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So this is what Tulsi was up to and likely what the whistleblower complaint is about. (Original Post) drray23 18 hrs ago OP
OK, I am confused, I thought that citizens of Puerto Rico were not able to vote Bev54 17 hrs ago #1
I imagine they have their own elections. Just can't for for president. SharonAnn 16 hrs ago #2
They only vote in one federal election, apart from primaries kurtyboy 15 hrs ago #3
With holding classified information Blue Full Moon 14 hrs ago #4

kurtyboy

(980 posts)
3. They only vote in one federal election, apart from primaries
Fri Feb 6, 2026, 01:58 AM
15 hrs ago
Puerto Rico gets a single non-voting delegate in the House, as do DC, Guam, the Northern Marianas (Saipan), American Samoa, and the US Virgin Islands.

These entities are included in each party's nominating processes, but citizens residing there cannot vote for President in the general election.

Blue Full Moon

(3,286 posts)
4. With holding classified information
Fri Feb 6, 2026, 02:30 AM
14 hrs ago

Last June, the then inspector general, Tamara Johnson, found that the claim Gabbard distributed classified information along political lines did not appear to be credible, according to the current watchdog, Christopher Fox. Johnson was “unable to assess the apparent credibility” of the accusation about the general counsel’s office, Fox wrote in the memo.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/05/republicans-tulsi-gabbard-whistleblower-complaint

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So this is what Tulsi was...