Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AverageOldGuy

(3,621 posts)
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 09:33 AM Yesterday

WARNING: Put on your tin foil hat before reading this.

Quoting from today's email from Democracy Docket:

Florida man claims to find hidden language in the Constitution that would allow Trump to impose voter ID
In a recent, completely unhinged social media rant, Trump promised that “there will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!” Obviously, Trump can’t do that, but he may think he can because of a ridiculous claim that there’s hidden language in the U.S. Constitution that vests electoral power in the federal government… which was discovered by a retired hotel manager in Florida.

As election scholar Rick Hasen pointed out, John N. Goodman, a retired hotel manager in Florida, recently claimed he was looking at a microfilm copy of the original Constitution and found “a faded shadow” of text that says the federal government has electoral power over the states in certain circumstances.

The research was shared with anti-voting activist Steve Stern — who hosts the popular MAGA podcast Stern American — who then shared it with MyPillow CEO and election conspiracist Mike Lindell, who in turn met with Trump to share the find.

Trump’s post noted that he has “searched the depths of legal arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the near future.” Could this be the “irrefutable” legal argument Trump plans to present soon? Isn’t this the plot of National Treasure?



If you are not familiar with the reference to "National Treasure," here's a link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Treasure_(film)

This is absolutely bizarre. But it's Mike Lindell and Trump, so . . . .



39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WARNING: Put on your tin foil hat before reading this. (Original Post) AverageOldGuy Yesterday OP
Right after we pick up those Haitian immigrants for eating people pets Walleye Yesterday #1
Do you still have the link to the website you copied this from? QueerDuck Yesterday #2
Before I got to the "National Treasure" reference I was thinking dflprincess Yesterday #3
But he himself has to climb the outside of Independence Hall PCIntern Yesterday #4
Sounds like the movie "National Treasure" with Nicolas Cage Jersey Devil Yesterday #5
Bamboo parchment on microfilm bucolic_frolic Yesterday #6
So this Florida Man has access to the original Constitution? Ilsa Yesterday #7
He said he found it on the microfilm which makes it even more insane. Wiz Imp Yesterday #11
I'm sure Ben Franklin had microfilm all figured out. nt Ilsa Yesterday #33
well there was microfilm by the time of the civil war Conjuay Yesterday #38
MyPedo says what??? Blue Owl Yesterday #8
Just finished watching "The Truth vs. Alex Jones" on HBO. That makes me think Scrivener7 Yesterday #9
found "a faded shadow" of text ---- If he can see it, he can show it. Norrrm Yesterday #10
Actually, he found it on his morning toast. nt ;-) Ilsa Yesterday #34
He had two toast for breakfast. One with a Jesus portrait and one with the Consitution. Norrrm Yesterday #39
Rachel Maddow possted about this last week. Wiz Imp Yesterday #12
The last words spoken by our dying democracy will be, "Obviously, Trump can't do that". thought crime Yesterday #13
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 ABC123Easy Yesterday #14
A "shadow of text" on microfilm. Mblaze Yesterday #15
brought to you by onethatcares Yesterday #16
What do you expect? relayerbob Yesterday #22
i thought onethatcares Yesterday #24
That was only for drones and webcams relayerbob Yesterday #35
And, I have now lost 15 I.Q. points. OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #17
Which means you are still fifty points higher than the average MAGAt. n/t malthaussen Yesterday #20
The thought that my dumb ass is fifty points above the average MAGAt is chilling, to be honest. OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #21
Next up usedtobedemgurl Yesterday #18
Visible only to MAGAts not fooled Yesterday #19
Really, really desperate peggysue2 Yesterday #31
Indisputable proof that MAGA rots the brain. OGBuzz Yesterday #23
? Dave Id Yesterday #25
No! Ray Bruns Yesterday #29
No worse than Alito's psychic reading of the Constitution nuxvomica Yesterday #26
Okay PJMcK Yesterday #27
Makes perfect sense in MAGAworld peggysue2 Yesterday #32
GOOD DONALD: Embrace your deepest feelings Chasstev365 Yesterday #28
I saw the same thing for healthcare Renew Deal Yesterday #30
You can't read the text accurately unless you have these: Ilsa Yesterday #36
🤪 underpants Yesterday #37

dflprincess

(29,265 posts)
3. Before I got to the "National Treasure" reference I was thinking
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 09:38 AM
Yesterday

Last edited Wed Feb 18, 2026, 03:09 PM - Edit history (1)

Someone needs to tell Trump there's a treasure map on the back of the Declaration today will lead join to a like a gold. Plotting how to steal that would keep him busy for the next three years.

PCIntern

(28,135 posts)
4. But he himself has to climb the outside of Independence Hall
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 09:43 AM
Yesterday

to retrieve the special glasses.

Jersey Devil

(10,802 posts)
5. Sounds like the movie "National Treasure" with Nicolas Cage
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 09:43 AM
Yesterday

where, if I remember correctly, they went looking for a map written in invisible ink on the back of the Declaration of Independence.

Ilsa

(64,105 posts)
7. So this Florida Man has access to the original Constitution?
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 09:48 AM
Yesterday

How delightful to know that any of us can access the founding documents in their earliest drafts!

Conjuay

(3,006 posts)
38. well there was microfilm by the time of the civil war
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 05:30 PM
Yesterday

So what's another hundred years, give or take?

Scrivener7

(59,039 posts)
9. Just finished watching "The Truth vs. Alex Jones" on HBO. That makes me think
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 10:04 AM
Yesterday

Last edited Wed Feb 18, 2026, 01:45 PM - Edit history (1)

this guy will get a following. Because the monsters among us will believe anything that makes others' lives miserable. And there are a lot of monsters.

Norrrm

(4,532 posts)
39. He had two toast for breakfast. One with a Jesus portrait and one with the Consitution.
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 05:47 PM
Yesterday

A third toast would have been Elvis.

(I'm exposing my old age to mention Elvis.)

Wiz Imp

(9,496 posts)
12. Rachel Maddow possted about this last week.
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 10:29 AM
Yesterday
https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=21021695

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=154326

In an email this morning, he wrote, it’s “important to point out to your readers that the Constitution on the surface says that the states do have 100% power over elections, but (there was an) obstructed console that was not noticed for many many years because it looks exactly like a faded shadow from the line above it, (so) I decided to go back the next day with a high-powered magnifier to add to the microfilm magnifier in order to still barely make out what it said… it said dictate electoral outcomes unfairly and the states cannot do that and then the actual words dictate electoral outcomes is also in that 1995 Supreme Court case and they elaborate in great detail such as the states powers designed by the framers were meant to be procedural, and their actions cannot compromise integrity of the election (to) favor or disfavor a certain class of candidate, or evade constitutional restraints.”


That's right, some moron believes there's super secret language in the Constitution which is only visible trough a high powered magnifier viewing a microfilm copy in a Florida library. And Trump believes that moron. Seriously.

As I wrote to the person who asked me about this, The idea that there is hidden language in the Constitution that vests electoral power in the federal government, in contradiction to the actual vesting in the states subject to congressional override in t elections, is laughable. If this is what the President was referring to as “irrefutable” proof to support an executive order on elections, he’s more gullible and ignorant than I thought.

As to U.S. Term Limits v. Thrornton, that is a Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court held that states did not have the power, even in the Article I, Section 4 Elections Clause, to alter the qualifications listed in the Constitution to serve in Congress. In the course of discussing how the Elections Clause power does not extended to altering congressional qualifications set forth in the Constitution, Justice Stevens wrote: {snip}

I’ve bolded the language (between the asterisks) that the insane Substack post points to. It does not come close to saying what the substacker implies. Justice Stevens in U.S. Term Limits was commenting on the limited power of states under the Elections Clause to do things like dictate electoral outcomes. That’s surely right. But nothing in the case, or in the Constitution, or in the super-secret part of the Constitution visible only on microfilm in a Florida library, says that the President, acting unilaterally, has the power to make or alter state regulations on the conduct of elections. The elections clause indeed provides that the only body that can override states’ regulations of elections is Congress, not the President.

onethatcares

(16,975 posts)
16. brought to you by
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 11:36 AM
Yesterday

Smith-Corona typewriters and microfilm machines, Pretty much need X Ray spec to read them after 250 ;years

relayerbob

(7,404 posts)
22. What do you expect?
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 11:48 AM
Yesterday

They had to fly in the micro film machines all the way from France and 1776.

OldBaldy1701E

(10,805 posts)
21. The thought that my dumb ass is fifty points above the average MAGAt is chilling, to be honest.
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 11:48 AM
Yesterday

Comforting... but chilling...

usedtobedemgurl

(1,964 posts)
18. Next up
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 11:36 AM
Yesterday

They will show us the Constitution and on the back it WILK verify what this guy said. Of course, the verification will be in black sharpie. No one will ever know how it got there!

peggysue2

(12,461 posts)
31. Really, really desperate
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:29 PM
Yesterday

Leading with evidence of a super-duper revelation about a Constitutional reading/interpretation on elections (of course), then referencing Pillow Guy's involvement is the tell of the century, a neon sign reading FALSE.

As in Pinocchio-false, pigs flying through the bright blue sky false, Trumpy-Dumpty false.

The bigger, more outrageous the lie the more the rubes will believe it. At least that's been the theory pre-Epstein cover-up, a strategy that's worked for Trump.

It will be interesting how many MAGAs will take the bait. Also, who will actively push this horseshit, go shoulder-to-shoulder with Lindell.

The craziness never ends!

Dave Id

(261 posts)
25. ?
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:03 PM
Yesterday

Is there anyone anywhere who isn't a complete nut job or racist, fascist POS that supports Trump. This has gone far beyond ridiculous.

nuxvomica

(13,991 posts)
26. No worse than Alito's psychic reading of the Constitution
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:09 PM
Yesterday

Like when he asserted that Congress intended for the 14th Amendment to only be enforced by statute, even though parts of it have been enforced by the courts, frequently and with major effect, without relying on statute.

PJMcK

(24,935 posts)
27. Okay
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:11 PM
Yesterday

Constitutional Law scholars have parsed and dissected the Constitution for quite some time but they never found this important nugget but a retired hotel manager, (from Florida, no less!), found it.

Right. Got it.

peggysue2

(12,461 posts)
32. Makes perfect sense in MAGAworld
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:39 PM
Yesterday

Because scholars and experts are unnecessary, even suspect in a culture where the ordinary Joe and Karen can do their own research and feel happy, fully confident in the results. Particularly when those results line up with their personal suspicions and beliefs.

Freedumb fully defined.

Renew Deal

(84,826 posts)
30. I saw the same thing for healthcare
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:28 PM
Yesterday

"The federal government will provide all healthcare services for residents"

underpants

(195,745 posts)
37. 🤪
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 05:24 PM
Yesterday

I was going to say something about Nicholas Cage but I see they mentioned it.

Loony tunes

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WARNING: Put on your tin...