Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,561 posts)
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 10:28 PM 21 hrs ago

Justice Dept. Lawyer Is Found in Contempt by Federal Judge

Gift Link
NYT


A federal judge in Minnesota found a Trump administration lawyer in civil contempt of court on Wednesday, a significant escalation between the judiciary and the executive branch amid a ballooning caseload triggered by President Trump’s immigration raids and novel interpretations of law.

According to the ruling, by Judge Laura M. Provinzino of Federal District Court in Minnesota, the government failed to return “identification documents” belonging to Rigoberto Soto Jimenez, a detained immigrant whom she had ordered to be released with all of his property returned. The judge ordered a $500 daily fine imposed on Matthew Isihara, an administration lawyer, for each day the documents are not returned, beginning on Friday.

In Minnesota and elsewhere, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has been arresting thousands of immigrants who have lived in the United States for years after entering the country illegally.

“Judge Provinzino’s order is a lawless abuse of judicial power,” Daniel N. Rosen, the U.S. attorney for the District of Minnesota, said in a statement.

An online profile belonging to Mr. Isihara identified him as a military judge advocate now detailed as a special assistant U.S. attorney. The case docket indicates that the contempt ruling came after a 93-minute hearing.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Dept. Lawyer Is Found in Contempt by Federal Judge (Original Post) In It to Win It 21 hrs ago OP
I hope that fine goes to the victim RainCaster 19 hrs ago #1
We need a whole lot more judges who won't take trump shit Bayard 19 hrs ago #2
This ruling made me smile LetMyPeopleVote 9 hrs ago #3
Deadline Legal Blog-Minnesota judge's contempt order shows a way to force government into compliance LetMyPeopleVote 3 hrs ago #4

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,532 posts)
3. This ruling made me smile
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 10:30 AM
9 hrs ago


A Minnesota judge found one of the dumbass lawyers at the DOJ in civil contempt, fining them $500/day until they follow the fucking law.

According to the ruling, by Judge Laura M. Provinzino of Federal District Court in Minnesota, the government failed to return “identification documents” belonging to Rigoberto Soto Jimenez, a detained immigrant whom she had ordered to be released with all of his property returned.

The judge ordered a $500 daily fine imposed on Matthew Isihara, an administration lawyer, for each day the documents are not returned, beginning on Friday.

The government’s lack of respect for court rulings stemming from such petitions has been raised by judges in the District of Minnesota, where the chief judge compiled a list of nearly 100 violations of court orders in habeas cases since Jan. 1, and in New Jersey, where the Justice Department admitted 52 violations since Dec. 5.

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,532 posts)
4. Deadline Legal Blog-Minnesota judge's contempt order shows a way to force government into compliance
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 04:30 PM
3 hrs ago

Judges are taking bold measures to get the Trump administration to comply with the law.

Minnesota judge’s contempt order shows a way to force government into compliance - MS NOW apple.news/ACm-vPNtpQYq...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2026-02-19T21:04:36.632Z

https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/minnesota-judge-contempt-order-trump-administration-compliance

The government’s failure to comply with court orders has been a theme of Donald Trump’s second term as president. The question has been what judges can do about it.

The answer may be to hold government officials and lawyers in contempt — or at least threaten to do so.

Underscoring the dire state of the rule of law in this country, Minnesota’s chief federal district judge last month set a hearing for the acting head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to explain why he shouldn’t be held in contempt, after the government failed to comply with an order to provide an immigrant a bond hearing or release them from custody.

The judge, Patrick Schiltz, acknowledged that he was taking an “extraordinary step” in the case of Juan Hugo Tobay Robles. But he explained why he felt the need to do so: The “extent of ICE’s violation of court orders is likewise extraordinary, and lesser measures have been tried and failed.”

Yet, the acting ICE chief, Todd Lyons, was never held in contempt. The government complied with the judge’s order before the hearing, thus rendering his appearance moot.....

The latest bold judicial response in Minnesota came this week, when a judge ordered a Trump government lawyer to be held in civil contempt. Such contempt is used to force compliance, whereas criminal contempt punishes violations.

The civil contempt order came in yet another immigration-related case, with U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino saying Wednesday that, starting Friday, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Isihara would have to pay $500 for each day that Rigoberto Soto Jimenez is not in possession of his identification documents. “For avoidance of doubt, the coercive fine will continue until the certification of compliance is filed on the docket,” the Biden-appointed judge’s order said.....

Later Wednesday, Paul Blume of Fox 9 in Minneapolis reported that Soto Jimenez’s lawyer said the government had given her client an overnight delivery tracking number and that the lawyer believed his identification papers would arrive on Thursday, nullifying any fines.

If that’s how this one ends, then it will have been another instance of the government doing what it had to do all along but only in the face of contempt consequences. That shouldn’t be necessary to run a legal system, but the contempt tool is there for a reason — and this administration is giving judges every reason to use it.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Dept. Lawyer Is F...