Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drray23

(8,676 posts)
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 10:52 AM Yesterday

We are going to see soon if the supreme court still matters to Trump

We may be at the point where Trump is so pissed after the tariffs were struck down that he will ignore the Supreme Court. Of course, they brought it upon themselves when they declared he was not liable for anything he does in office that can be construed as official.


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We are going to see soon if the supreme court still matters to Trump (Original Post) drray23 Yesterday OP
The thing is PCB66 Yesterday #1
Beginning to think 3 govt branches weren't enough leftstreet 23 hrs ago #4
We've relied on the fed govt to enforce SC rulings Buckeyeblue 23 hrs ago #5
Yeah, though he has often backed down when stood up too. We'll see & he'll flail. My guess is that he deflects as always themaguffin Yesterday #2
Well, tRump can't ignore this ruling. Let him insist the tariffs are still in place. Sibelius Fan 23 hrs ago #3

PCB66

(92 posts)
1. The thing is
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 11:12 AM
Yesterday

The Constitution only says what the Supreme Court says it said.

Supreme Court Justices are appointed by politicians.

The Court has no enforcement mechanism so anybody in a position of power can ignore what the Court has affirmed.

We actually see it quite often. Many times court rulings are ignored without any consequences.

Our Constitutional Republic is only as viable as the Rule of Law.

leftstreet

(39,760 posts)
4. Beginning to think 3 govt branches weren't enough
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 12:41 PM
23 hrs ago

You'd think the legislative could hammer out these differences between the exec and judicial

But apparently no one's in charge - anywhere

Buckeyeblue

(6,309 posts)
5. We've relied on the fed govt to enforce SC rulings
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:04 PM
23 hrs ago

Think about the school integration efforts where presidents have called in the national guard to enforce.

But with this, how do you enforce customs officials not charging tariffs? I guess they become bribes that Trump will just pocket.

themaguffin

(5,062 posts)
2. Yeah, though he has often backed down when stood up too. We'll see & he'll flail. My guess is that he deflects as always
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 11:19 AM
Yesterday

Sibelius Fan

(24,795 posts)
3. Well, tRump can't ignore this ruling. Let him insist the tariffs are still in place.
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 12:37 PM
23 hrs ago

Who would have the legal standing to impose and collect them? Who would be stupid enough to pay them? The lawsuits would be stacked to the moon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We are going to see soon ...