Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 05:12 PM Dec 2012

I'll bet that republicans can't organize a majority of their members for this 'deal'

It would likely pass with a majority of Democratic votes, but they're still not willing to go past the 'Hastert rule' where they want a majority of republican votes in the House for anything they bring to the floor for votes.

I don't think republicans will even bring this offer up for a vote.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'll bet that republicans can't organize a majority of their members for this 'deal' (Original Post) bigtree Dec 2012 OP
They don't need a majority of their members alcibiades_mystery Dec 2012 #1
Hastert rule in effect bigtree Dec 2012 #2
That doesn't get past the "Hastert Rule" RomneyLies Dec 2012 #3
this illistrates the difference between democrats and repubicans bowens43 Dec 2012 #4
I read it as a cravenness on most important issues bigtree Dec 2012 #5

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
2. Hastert rule in effect
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 05:16 PM
Dec 2012

They will have trouble bringing up a bill in the House that doesn't have majority republican support . . . They'll have trouble pushing past their 'Hastert rule.'

from wiki:

The majority of the majority is a governing principle (not a legal procedure) used by Republican Speakers of the House of Representatives since the mid-1990's to effectively limit the power of the minority party to bring bills up for a vote on the floor of the house Under the majority of the majority doctrine the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives will not allow a vote on a bill to take place unless the majority of the majority party supports the bill. This is sometimes referred to as the “Hastert Rule”, as its introduction is widely credited to former Speaker Dennis Hastert (1999-2007); however, Newt Gingrich, who directly preceded Hastert as Speaker (1995-1999), followed the same rule. Hastert was vocal in his support of the rule stating that his job was "to please the majority of the majority."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_of_the_majority

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
3. That doesn't get past the "Hastert Rule"
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 05:16 PM
Dec 2012

Under the "Hastert Rule", when Republicans control the House no bill can come to the floor for a vote that will not pass without a majority of the Republican Caucus.

Democrats have never followed this rule.

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
4. this illistrates the difference between democrats and repubicans
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 05:25 PM
Dec 2012

republicans are much less likely to compromise their principles.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
5. I read it as a cravenness on most important issues
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 05:41 PM
Dec 2012

You can't argue here that their obstruction and obstinacy involves any 'principle' that Democrats should support or emulate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'll bet that republicans...