Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
McConnell's gambit
McConnell's gambit
by Jed Lewison
Brian Beutler on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's latest gambit:
True, but there's an important caveat. Given that the tax cut threshold of $450,000 that Democrats negotiated with Mitch McConnell was predicated on delaying the sequester's spending cuts, there's no reason that they should feel compelled to stick by that number now that McConnell is taking the sequester off the table. Instead, Democrats should go back to their original alternative plan: putting forward legislation that would extend tax cuts on all income below $250,000 along with unemployment benefits.
Given the logic of McConnell's statement, he should be willing to support that plan. And if he can't bring himself to support it, he needs to either pay the political price for opposing it or put something else on the table as a concession. And that means delaying the sequester.
Basically, McConnell is saying that he only wants to enact the parts of the deal that he likes—the parts where Democrats compromised. But he doesn't want to enact the parts where Republicans would have had to compromise. And while I wouldn't bet against Democrats accepting that "offer," they really should reject it—especially now that House Republicans have announced they plan to take us over the "cliff."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/31/1175160/-McConnell-s-gambit
by Jed Lewison
Brian Beutler on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's latest gambit:
On the Senate floor a few minutes ago Mitch McConnell made Democrats an offer. Now that he and the White House basically agree on the tax piece of the so-called fiscal cliff, Congress should pass legislation to prevent the Bush tax cuts from expiring at midnight, and grapple with the “sequester” in the coming days.
This is an offer Democrats will have a hard time turning down.
True, but there's an important caveat. Given that the tax cut threshold of $450,000 that Democrats negotiated with Mitch McConnell was predicated on delaying the sequester's spending cuts, there's no reason that they should feel compelled to stick by that number now that McConnell is taking the sequester off the table. Instead, Democrats should go back to their original alternative plan: putting forward legislation that would extend tax cuts on all income below $250,000 along with unemployment benefits.
Given the logic of McConnell's statement, he should be willing to support that plan. And if he can't bring himself to support it, he needs to either pay the political price for opposing it or put something else on the table as a concession. And that means delaying the sequester.
Basically, McConnell is saying that he only wants to enact the parts of the deal that he likes—the parts where Democrats compromised. But he doesn't want to enact the parts where Republicans would have had to compromise. And while I wouldn't bet against Democrats accepting that "offer," they really should reject it—especially now that House Republicans have announced they plan to take us over the "cliff."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/31/1175160/-McConnell-s-gambit
Fuck off, Mitch!
Pull the plug on this farce and move to the up or down vote on $250,000.
Obama To Congress: Come To A Deal – Or Else
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022088083
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
