Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(54,958 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 05:16 PM 13 hrs ago

Justice Alito's Latest Opinion Is a Very, Very Bad Sign for Voting Rights

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/03/samuel-alito-opinion-new-york-voting-rights-act-supreme-court/


The Supreme Court on Monday evening overturned a New York state court ruling that found that the Staten Island-based district of Republican US House Rep. Nicole Malliotakis discriminated against Black and Latino voters and needed to be redrawn. The Supreme Court’s intervention preserves a GOP-led seat that would have been likely to shift to Democrats this November.

The court’s ruling sets a disturbing precedent for voting rights in several ways. Federal courts are supposed to defer to state courts on matters of state law. And the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that courts should not change election laws in the middle of an election season, and in this instance the filing deadline for candidates in New York has already passed.

In her dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan, Justice Sonia Sotomayor blasted the court’s conservative majority for using one set of rules to uphold redistricting maps that benefit white voters and Republicans in states like Texas while using a completely different set of rules to strike down maps that benefit racial minorities and Democrats in places like New York.

“Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not interfere with state-court litigation,” Sotomayor wrote. “Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not meddle with state election laws ahead of an election. Today, the Court says: except for this one, except for this one, and except for this one.”

*snip*
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Alito's Latest Opinion Is a Very, Very Bad Sign for Voting Rights (Original Post) Nevilledog 13 hrs ago OP
The US Supreme Court is all in with a permanent GOP dictatorship. Irish_Dem 13 hrs ago #1
Because Democrats are just going to lay down for this shit orangecrush 10 hrs ago #5
You see, THAT'S the scary part bluestarone 13 hrs ago #2
Just one more reason why support for court expansion must be a litmus test for our candidates Fiendish Thingy 13 hrs ago #3
K&R orangecrush 10 hrs ago #4
K&R UTUSN 9 hrs ago #6

bluestarone

(21,985 posts)
2. You see, THAT'S the scary part
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 05:22 PM
13 hrs ago

All they have to do is make a decision. NOW think here. THAT DECISION is FINALE there is not shit we can do about that.

Fiendish Thingy

(22,810 posts)
3. Just one more reason why support for court expansion must be a litmus test for our candidates
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 05:23 PM
13 hrs ago

Without expanding the court and killing the filibuster to do so, it will be impossible to restore rights and repair the damage from the Trump era.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Alito's Latest Op...