Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

womanofthehills

(10,989 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 11:13 PM Mar 4

House votes 357-65 to block release of congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports

“HOLY FUCK it wasn't even close.

I'm going to tell my kids this is Epstein Island”


?s=46
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House votes 357-65 to block release of congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports (Original Post) womanofthehills Mar 4 OP
Can anyone justify this? Ferrets are Cool Mar 4 #1
Yup. Bunch of pedos. SheltieLover Mar 4 #2
Nope. There's no justification for this whatsoever. Initech Mar 4 #3
Looks like JBTaurus83 Mar 4 #4
It would look that way, pedo Congress...there are probably other "Epstein Islands" we don't know about...geez... wcmagumba Mar 4 #5
George Carlin was right - it's a big club and we're not in it! Initech Mar 5 #12
Just throw out some bait and then real them in. multigraincracker Mar 4 #6
Link to how members voted dflprincess Mar 4 #7
That's beyond surprise, it's shocking, FoxNewsSucks Mar 5 #9
Ilhan Omar? Jamie Raskin?? AOC??? calimary Mar 5 #11
Not surprised anymore n/t Timewas Mar 4 #8
Complete mischaracterization. Wiz Imp Mar 5 #10

wcmagumba

(6,213 posts)
5. It would look that way, pedo Congress...there are probably other "Epstein Islands" we don't know about...geez...
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 11:19 PM
Mar 4

dflprincess

(29,349 posts)
7. Link to how members voted
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 11:49 PM
Mar 4
https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2026/roll083.xml

Based on some of the names who voted Yes (in this case a Yes, essentially killed the resolution by sending it back to the Ethics Committee) there's more to this than the OP implies.

Just a few names I was surprised to see in the Yeas column:
Ilhan Omar
Jamie Raskin
Kelly Morrison
AOC
Betty McCollum
Jasmine Crockett


FoxNewsSucks

(11,729 posts)
9. That's beyond surprise, it's shocking,
Thu Mar 5, 2026, 12:36 AM
Mar 5

I want to hear an explanation for this. What don't we know?

calimary

(90,085 posts)
11. Ilhan Omar? Jamie Raskin?? AOC???
Thu Mar 5, 2026, 01:55 AM
Mar 5

And Jasmine Crockett???

I never would have guessed!

I’m guessing they have reasons, and I hope those reasons make sense. For the life of me, I can’t figure this one out.

Wiz Imp

(10,028 posts)
10. Complete mischaracterization.
Thu Mar 5, 2026, 01:23 AM
Mar 5
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5767307-house-bats-down-mace-effort-to-reveal-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-members-of-congress/
The House on Wednesday batted down an effort from Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) to publicly release all reports on file with the House Ethics Committee on investigations into members of Congress regarding allegations of sexual harassment of staff or of a sexual relationship with a member of their staff.

In a 357-65-1 vote, the chamber moved to refer the matter to the House Ethics Committee — a move that essentially kills the effort. Thirty-eight Republicans and 27 Democrats voted against referring the resolution to the panel. Members who voted with Mace included members who have faced scrutiny over their own conduct, such as Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.).

Many/most of the worst of the worst Republicns voted NO, which makes it clear that a NO vote was not a good thing.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House votes 357-65 to blo...