Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse votes 357-65 to block release of congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports
HOLY FUCK it wasn't even close.
I'm going to tell my kids this is Epstein Island
Link to tweet
?s=46
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House votes 357-65 to block release of congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports (Original Post)
womanofthehills
Mar 4
OP
Ferrets are Cool
(22,971 posts)1. Can anyone justify this?
SheltieLover
(80,614 posts)2. Yup. Bunch of pedos.
Initech
(108,812 posts)3. Nope. There's no justification for this whatsoever.
The midterms can't get here soon enough!
JBTaurus83
(1,409 posts)4. Looks like
357 people need new jobs.
wcmagumba
(6,213 posts)5. It would look that way, pedo Congress...there are probably other "Epstein Islands" we don't know about...geez...
Initech
(108,812 posts)12. George Carlin was right - it's a big club and we're not in it!
multigraincracker
(37,666 posts)6. Just throw out some bait and then real them in.
Those suckers are always biting.
dflprincess
(29,349 posts)7. Link to how members voted
https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2026/roll083.xml
Based on some of the names who voted Yes (in this case a Yes, essentially killed the resolution by sending it back to the Ethics Committee) there's more to this than the OP implies.
Just a few names I was surprised to see in the Yeas column:
Ilhan Omar
Jamie Raskin
Kelly Morrison
AOC
Betty McCollum
Jasmine Crockett
Based on some of the names who voted Yes (in this case a Yes, essentially killed the resolution by sending it back to the Ethics Committee) there's more to this than the OP implies.
Just a few names I was surprised to see in the Yeas column:
Ilhan Omar
Jamie Raskin
Kelly Morrison
AOC
Betty McCollum
Jasmine Crockett
FoxNewsSucks
(11,729 posts)9. That's beyond surprise, it's shocking,
I want to hear an explanation for this. What don't we know?
calimary
(90,085 posts)11. Ilhan Omar? Jamie Raskin?? AOC???
And Jasmine Crockett???
I never would have guessed!
Im guessing they have reasons, and I hope those reasons make sense. For the life of me, I cant figure this one out.
Timewas
(2,743 posts)8. Not surprised anymore n/t
Wiz Imp
(10,028 posts)10. Complete mischaracterization.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5767307-house-bats-down-mace-effort-to-reveal-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-members-of-congress/
Many/most of the worst of the worst Republicns voted NO, which makes it clear that a NO vote was not a good thing.
The House on Wednesday batted down an effort from Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) to publicly release all reports on file with the House Ethics Committee on investigations into members of Congress regarding allegations of sexual harassment of staff or of a sexual relationship with a member of their staff.
In a 357-65-1 vote, the chamber moved to refer the matter to the House Ethics Committee a move that essentially kills the effort. Thirty-eight Republicans and 27 Democrats voted against referring the resolution to the panel. Members who voted with Mace included members who have faced scrutiny over their own conduct, such as Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.).
In a 357-65-1 vote, the chamber moved to refer the matter to the House Ethics Committee a move that essentially kills the effort. Thirty-eight Republicans and 27 Democrats voted against referring the resolution to the panel. Members who voted with Mace included members who have faced scrutiny over their own conduct, such as Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.).
Many/most of the worst of the worst Republicns voted NO, which makes it clear that a NO vote was not a good thing.