General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm done with this
No matter the letter after your name, If you vote for another penny of military funding I will not vote for you.
If you vote for one more penny of money for this war I will not vote for you.
No more warmongering fascists running our country. We can no longer allow endless wars to be the norm.
Peace. Science. Life.
Deuxcents
(26,481 posts)lame54
(39,545 posts)Even if they both gave money
angrychair
(12,145 posts)No more war. No more excuses.
lame54
(39,545 posts)angrychair
(12,145 posts)No matter the letter after their name.
lame54
(39,545 posts)Is in there because of non voters
angrychair
(12,145 posts)I voted for the lady that didn't want war.
I'm drawing an unequivocal, unapologetic line and there are no exceptions.
We are drawing to many exceptions, tired of given people a pass that vote in support of pedophiles or vote for war.
Peace. Science. Life.
wnylib
(25,677 posts)I think that, regarding Dems, the warmongers should be primaried and voted against.
In the general election., though, it is still to our advantage to vote D over R because enough D votes will give us the numbers in Congress to have a majority. A majority of Dems allows us to better fight against the fascists, reverse their policies and restore sanity.
You assume non-voters are Democrats. That is not necessarily so. Many locals here who had never voted before went out and voted for Trump. Reaching non-voters is a worthy goal. Blaming them doesn't help.
lame54
(39,545 posts)Have a good day
Cirsium
(3,813 posts)What in the world has happened to political discussion? "Have a good day?"
OK, I will.
W_HAMILTON
(10,298 posts)The reason why we're in this position to begin with is because *just* enough people wanted to punish Democrats.
Their short-sightedness helped Republicans get elected.
Response to angrychair (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Totally Tunsie
(11,766 posts)ok_cpu
(2,242 posts)Maru Kitteh
(31,587 posts)not one penny.
RetiredParatrooper
(150 posts)Part of the reason we are in this position is binary thinking like this.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)I'm tired of war and death and grift.
Tired of endless death of people of color to satisfy the blood lust of billionaire warmongers.
What is binary thinking about that?
lapfog_1
(31,849 posts)I remember this shit from 18 months ago.
And that is how we got a new endless war in Iran. Not to mention Genocide in Gaza.
Vote Blue no matter Who.
RetiredParatrooper
(150 posts)If you opt out because of the grievances you listed in your OP, that is part of the reason the Orange MFer got elected in the first place.
Twice.
Are you suggesting we should defund the DoD?
angrychair
(12,145 posts)Could have phrased it better in my OP. The point is I'm not supporting endless wars and bottomless military budgets. That is a better way of saying what I mean.
I will happily vote for any Democrat that supports that position. I don't think they is a very high bar and I'm dumbfounded that people think that is too much to ask.
I'm tired of people gaslighting me that we don't have the money for things like Medicare for All or NIH funding but we always have trillions of dollars for military spending.
Do you realize we spend more on our military then the next 18 countries, combined. How about we only spend as much as the next two countries combined? Is that too much to ask?
rampartd
(4,491 posts)a 2 party system requires it.
Zelda_Orchid
(78 posts)and a fascist that supports military funding, supports concentration camps, supports murdering American civilians, protects pedophiles, and is corrupt the the core ... the choice is simple. Vote for the Democrat!
angrychair
(12,145 posts)More endless wars. More people of color dying so we can steal their oil. More grift. More money in the pocket of billionaires.
Sorry, I'm getting off that train. No longer contributing to this cycle of violence.
No more endless blood money for the war pigs.
Zelda_Orchid
(78 posts)angrychair
(12,145 posts)Voting in support of more war and more death and more violence and more grift and more pedophiles, then that Democrat is a fascist.
I'm fully in support of Democrats that are against more military funding. We don't need anymore trillion dollar budgets or anything even close to that.
Zelda_Orchid
(78 posts)Not for upholding any arbitrary litmus test that can be money wrenched by the fascists. See 2000, 2004, 2016, 2024 ...
angrychair
(12,145 posts)About not supporting endless war and bottomless military budgets?
Do you realize this latest military budget was over a trillion dollars and they now want even more? When is it enough? If you keep doing the same thing over and over again how can you expect a different result?
I will happily vote in favor of any Democrat that is not in favor of endless war and bottomless military budgets. There is nothing arbitrary about that.
Zelda_Orchid
(78 posts)The fascists have spent the last 4 decades exploiting those differences - and making up new ones - to divide the Democratic coalition & keep the fascists in power.
STOP LETTING THEM!
"United We Stand, Divided We Fall" isn't just a catchy slogan.
We are stronger together than they are, and there's more of us than them. Refusing to support Democrats now will lead directly to a total fascist takeover, and continue the very things you're complaining about.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)Isn't voting for people that support endless war and bottomless military budgets also supporting the continuation of the same thing these fascists want?
Honestly, your position seems to be that Democrats support that and my position is I know they do not. There are some that do and those are the people we need to purge from our ranks in favor of people that do not support trillion dollar military budgets.
It's about not doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
Response to angrychair (Reply #52)
Post removed
angrychair
(12,145 posts)So "United we stand" even if that stance is endless war and bottomless military budgets?
Murdering brown people to steal their resources?
Sorry, I'm not doing that.
Never again. I am just one person and I have zero power but my vote. If asking a Democratic Party candidate to not support endless wars and bottomless military budgets is too much to ask then I will happily be in the wrong.
Zelda_Orchid
(78 posts)The fascists want to kill you. The Democrats don't.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)That supporting endless wars and bottomless military budgets is wanting to kill me.
Because if we are funding trillion+ dollar military budgets then we are not funding the NIH or CDC Dept of Education or Dept of State or NOAA or FEMA or USAID or any of the dozens of organizations that directly contribute to the health and safety of all Americans in ways no amount of military spending ever will or can do.
If a Democratic Party candidate cannot bring themselves to not support endless wars and bottomless military budgets then how exactly do we achieve any of the things we say we want to achieve when our military budgets become $1.5 trillion dollars? Then $2 trillion dollars?
No longer letting people gaslight me into believing that we cannot afford Medicare for All but we can afford a trillion dollar military budget.
Wiz Imp
(9,760 posts)How is being against endless wars and bottomless military budgets mean I support a dictatorship?
I'm only not voting for Democrats that do. Are you insinuating that we should support even Democrats that are?
That's a pretty wild take.
Serious question: do you support endless wars and bottomless military budgets?
angrychair
(12,145 posts)That isn't an answer.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)If we keep voting for endless wars and bottomless military budgets then how do we fund the things we say we want things like Medicare for All? NIH? Dept of Education?
I mean when is it enough? Is a $1.5 trillion dollar military budget too much? $2 trillion dollars?
I mean what is the point of being a Democrat if you only pay lip service to all the things Democrats believe in but always have money for the MIC?
Quiet Em
(2,823 posts)Most Democrats are flatly ruling it out, noting that President Donald Trump didnt seek authorization from Congress before launching the war, so lawmakers now have no duty to help him bankroll another costly military operation in the Middle East.
Our answer should just be simply, No, youre not getting money to fund an illegal, unpopular, potentially world-altering war, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told HuffPost.
https://www.aol.com/articles/democrats-very-skeptical-funding-trump-171128569.html
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,406 posts)Next up: Not another vote for Democrats if they.....
orangecrush
(29,909 posts)To get what they want, even with a razor thin majority.
Funny how that works.
SunImp
(2,691 posts)that constantly talk down to people about "Purity tests" or the lazy "
"
angrychair
(12,145 posts)But I'm not bending on this. Tired of endless wars to murder people of color to steal their resources.
I'm done. I'm getting off this merry-go-round of death.
paleotn
(22,059 posts)Gee, that seems sorta kinda like that whole Gaza bit back in Nov. 2024. How'd that work out? Oops.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)Vote for any Democrat that is against more military funding.
Serious question:
Why would you support someone that supports war and murder and theft?
paleotn
(22,059 posts)I get your anger. Really I do.
The DoD budget has to be renewed usually on an annual basis. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your argument. Are you saying a penny in additional funding on top of last year's budget or a penny period? There's a significant difference. If you're calling for reductions, even massive reductions, I'm with you. A significant amount of DoD spend every year is for legacy systems and infrastructure DoD doesn't even want or need. It's a Congressional make work project for their districts, Dems and Pukes. And it hampers DoD from being able to fight todays war since much of that spend is based on a couple wars ago.
But while we're cutting the fat, don't cut bone and muscle. Dangerous world out there. And just because the tools of defense are misused doesn't mean we need to throw away ALL the tools.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)We can longer afford a unlimited military budget.
We can longer afford to be gaslighted by people that we cannot afford Medicare for all or early childhood education or support our injured veterans but have all the budget in the world for a $100 billion dollar aircraft carrier.
What we are doing now can never happen again.
paleotn
(22,059 posts)Not unlimited when we have far more pressing needs. We don't need to be the world's police force. DoD also doesn't need to be some crazy wanker's play thing either. Do we really need 11 aircraft carriers at a billion a pop or more? 11 and counting? Oh hell no.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)Cost $13 billion dollars and the toilets barely work.
It's a real life shit show.
I mean we don't need a military budget of more than the next 18 countries combined. Maybe only the next two countries combined?
I also realize that we have been using the defense budget as an artificial jobs program but we need to stop doing that.
paleotn
(22,059 posts)SunImp
(2,691 posts)Zelda_Orchid
(78 posts)No matter the letter after your name, If you vote for another penny of military funding I will not vote for you.
If you vote for one more penny of money for this war I will not vote for you.
No more warmongering fascists running our country. We can no longer allow endless wars to be the norm.
Peace. Science. Life.
Sorry, I don't see it. Op is just saying they won't vote for anyone who wants to fund any wars or spend our tax dollars on tanks instead of things like healthcare. For me I'm okay with some military spending for our country, but as for funding other nations nope
paleotn
(22,059 posts)Seems you're doing it as well. That's natural. We're all human. Well, except for Trump.
sop
(18,331 posts)angrychair
(12,145 posts)We are in a war. It should not be extreme position to not want a Democrat running for public office to not support endless war and trillion dollar military budgets.
If a Democrat doesn't support killing people of color in another country to steal their resources then they have my vote.
Not sure how that's controversial.
sop
(18,331 posts)I just don't think what you're suggesting will be productive.
I don't think it's unrealistic.
If we keep voting for people that will support stuff like that then how, specifically, do we expect anything to change?
sop
(18,331 posts)but there are many other forms of change to consider.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)Because here is the thing, where is the money coming from to do those other things we need to do? Funding the VA? Funding early childhood education? Universal healthcare?
Literally anything?
Because where exactly is that money coming from to do all that stuff we as Democrats want to do but we are always fighting a losing battle against an ever increasing budget for our Dept of endless war? if we have a $1.5 trillion dollar military budget? A $2 trillion dollar military budget? When does it end?
I will happily vote for candidates that do not support endless war and bottomless military budgets.
H2O Man
(78,938 posts)I hope there are primaries where they can be weeded out. And we need to do some weeding out those who support this. Hopefully, people have learned that support for the war in Gaza was a significant factor in the 2024 loses. I also focus on who they get donations from. But I will always vote for a Democrat in general elections.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)But I'm getting off this merry-go-round of blood.
My position is unequivocal and unapologetic: if you support more war. More death. An endless trough of blood money to murder people of color and steal their resources, I'm not voting for that person. Period.
paleotn
(22,059 posts)I am against endless wars and bottomless military budgets.
I am only talking about Democrats that support that.
I don't think that should be a high bar or in the least controversial.
Serious question: do you support endless wars and bottomless military budgets?
paleotn
(22,059 posts)angrychair
(12,145 posts)I could have worded it better in the OP because I've figured out a better way to say in as the conversations have progressed "no endless wars or bottomless military budgets" is much more clear.
leftstreet
(40,117 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(178,548 posts)Quiet Em
(2,823 posts)Republicans will need seven Democrats.
My Senators, Gillibrand and Schumer, are against any funding for the con's war that nobody asked for and nobody wants.
Scrivener7
(59,295 posts)a moral stance against funding and participating in this asinine war.
That's ... a big part of the problem, I'd say.
NH Ethylene
(31,320 posts)Each has stances on a large variety of issues. We learn about the candidates and choose the one who is the best, or at least the least objectionable. And of course that is always the Dem.
Single issue voting is partly what gave us a second term of Trump. People who cared passionately about the genocide in Gaza were angry at Harris for not taking a stand against Israel for these actions. Many did not realize that Trump would be far less sympathetic to Palestinians than Harris, nor were they politically savvy enough to realize Harris had to maintain that support for Israel or she would be skewered as antisemitic during the election. We all wound up with Trump and they were bitterly betrayed.
We need to understand there is a lot of nuance in politics. A female candidate, for example, has to sound tough on enemies or she will be considered weak. That doesn't mean she will bomb 8 countries in her first year!
So we have to make a choice based on many factors, many issues, many impressions. And we make the best choice we can. Trump made 'no new wars' a part of his campaign. Based on your criteria, he would be the one to vote for, and yet doing so unleashes chaos, crime, fascism and lies.
angrychair
(12,145 posts)Two, I voted for Kamala Harris.
Three, I think asking a Democratic Party candidate to not support endless wars and bottomless military budgets is not controversial or too much of an ask.