General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWar is the Absence of Women
It cannot go unsaid - during Women's History Month - that war largely emerges from the presence of deranged men - and the absence of women. Yes, defenses are necessary (don't women live that way?) but the bro gloating over destruction and firepower is revolting. I see sadism emerging as policy from Trump, Miller, and their yes, sir! men and yes, sir! women. And when I see that, I still see the absence of women.
Walleye
(44,517 posts)I remember when Madeline Albright was secretary of state and she sat down with the head of the Palestinian movement at that time and I cant remember her name, but it was two women and they sat there and they worked out the whole problem.
Ocelot II
(130,221 posts)Walleye
(44,517 posts)I think more American women are being kept out of the arena by massaging ism, hateful, ridicule. Anonymous death threats. Weve got to show them who we are. I guess were tired of taking this shit. God, dammit, we are American women and we are strong
Quiet Em
(2,835 posts)blowing up bad men governing another country.
It's really quite ridiculous.
suegeo
(3,131 posts)The following study demonstrates that violence ensues if there are too many men and too much gender inequality.
https://kar.kent.ac.uk/11430/1/surplus_men_IS_article.pdf
exaggerated gender inequality.
and also
and
may be tied to the status of women in society. When that status is very
low, the possibilities for a full and meaningful democracy and for a peaceful
foreign policy are distinctly less. High sex-ratio societies, denoting a very
low status for women, cannot be expected to emulate normal sex-ratio societies
either in terms of their form of government or in terms of their tendency to
ward peacefulness.
Yes, very clear.
Walleye
(44,517 posts)And I also say its not the men we worry about, its the overgrown boys
Sogo
(7,160 posts)nt
Walleye
(44,517 posts)NJCher
(42,981 posts)Have you ever noticed that many become unglued if their spouse or partner dies first?
Have you ever looked at their homes? Generally kind of pitiful, but not always. Sheesh, I even recall a guy who stapled his curtains to the window frame.
And don't even ask me about the time I asked one to set the placemats for dinner.
And they are the first to admit it, too.
Not sure I agree with your observation because its a very broad brush stroke.
Anecdotally, Ive seen both men and women who dont do well after they lose their partner. Ive also seen the opposite where the individual thrives on their own.
But stapling the curtains?! Thats a new one to me!
NJCher
(42,981 posts)but they are rare. You're probably one of them.
PJMcK
(25,017 posts)That was very nice of you!
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,827 posts)FakeNoose
(41,234 posts)Something in the male psyche makes them blind to this crazy thinking. Somehow the madness in males convinces them that "I'm going to survive this, even if you and everyone else doesn't. Therefore I win."
But women don't have that magical thinking, and it enables us (I'm a woman) to stand back objectively and say "This is crazy, it's going to destroy everyone and everything."
Walleye
(44,517 posts)The current administration thinks we are worthless
stage left
(3,273 posts)Women are more pragmatic than men and more practical. They have to be. We should try a matriarchy for a change.
Jose Garcia
(3,488 posts)
littlemissmartypants
(32,810 posts)Sex and World Peace: How the Treatment of Women Affects Development and Security
Runtime 1:53:16
What we have discovered is that the very best predictor of how insecure and unstable a nation is not its level of democracy, its not its level of wealth, its not what Huntington civilization it belongs to, but is in fact best predicted by the level of violence against women in the society, said Valerie Hudson, co-author of Sex and World Peace, at an April 26 book launch at the Wilson Center.
The basis of the book applying a gender lens to international security followed from early feedback from her colleagues at Brigham Young University, who suggested that if her goal was to understand the reasons for blood spilt and lives lost, she would do better to look at ideological conflict rather than womens security.
In response, she made a simple comparison of deaths from conflict and the number of missing women in the world. Looking at as many [conflicts] as I possibly could, Hudson said she totaled 152 million deaths in 20th century fighting. By comparison, the United Nations Population Fund reported that at the turn of the century just one generation, if you will, of the century 163 million women went missing from Asia alone.
The missing women phenomenon is a significant paradox in global development, said Klugman. On the one hand there have been enormous advances in terms of life expectancy, but at the same time, relative to boys and men, theres still enormous excess mortality.
http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2012/05/sex-and-world-peace-how-the-treatment-of-women-affects-development-and-security/
The discussion:
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Hudson%20Presentation.pdf
Sex & World Peace by Valerie M. Hudson, Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill, Mary Caprioli, and Chad F. Emmett
Helen M. Kinsella | May 31, 2013

https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827/
Pub Date: February 2014
ISBN: 9780231131834
304 Pages
Format: Paperback
List Price: $24.95 £20.00
❤️