AIPAC's Attack on the Liberal Zionists

[Celerity]

Why is the lobby targeting liberal supporters of Israel?

https://jewishcurrents.org/aipacs-attack-on-the-liberal-zionists


Daniel Biss, running in a Democratic Congressional primary in Illinois, has weathered attacks from an AIPAC-linked super PAC.

Since late February, an AIPAC-linked super PAC called Elect Chicago Women has spent $1.4 million attacking Evanston, Illinois mayor Daniel Biss, a liberal Zionist running in the Democratic primary for a Chicago-area House seat. It seemed a replay of the tactic AIPAC used in February in New Jersey’s 11th Congressional district, where the pro-Israel group spent over $2 million against the moderate pro-Israel Democrat Tom Malinowski, who had been open to conditioning aid to Israel. AIPAC’s strategy there backfired after their attacks on Malinowski led to the Democratic primary victory of Analilla Mejia, a more left-wing candidate who has called Israel’s actions in Gaza a genocide. The attacks on Biss resurface the puzzle of the Malinowski race: Why is AIPAC using its resources to attack liberal Zionists, particularly in races where they face opponents farther to their left?

This week, with just days to go before the March 17th election, AIPAC’s strategy in Illinois appears to have shifted. As the more left-wing candidate, Kat Abughazaleh, moves into second place—only four points behind Biss, according to a new poll—AIPAC is now spending heavily against her. In recent weeks, the AIPAC-linked super PAC Chicago Progressive Partnership has dropped around $1 million against Abughazaleh, who opposes all weapons sales to Israel. The last-minute turn against Abughazaleh seems to be an indication that AIPAC’s attacks on Biss could be pushing voters towards Abughazaleh, rather than their preferred candidate, State Senator Laura Fine, said Usamah Andrabi, the communications director for the progressive electoral group Justice Democrats, which has endorsed Abughazaleh. “That was a misstep that probably led to more voters going to Kat, and now in the 11th hour they’re spending against Kat,” he said.

The pricey last-minute attacks on Abughazaleh highlight the bind in which AIPAC has found itself, as it struggles to oppose both leftist critics of Israel, and liberal Democrats who were formerly willing to join the AIPAC camp. Political observers say AIPAC is focusing their money on liberal Democrats because they are going after the candidates thought to be the front-runners in their districts, and because the liberals increasingly support conditions on aid to Israel, a position that AIPAC sees as anathema. “There is no safe liberal Zionist, centrist position that a candidate can take that will keep AIPAC off their back,” said Beth Miller, the political director of the anti-Zionist group JVP Action. “AIPAC is making it very clear that if you support Palestinian rights at all, and you are a possible contender, then you’re on their list.”

Biss and Malinowski told Jewish Currents that there is another reason why AIPAC is going after them: As candidates with close ties to the Jewish community and a track record of supporting Israel, they say AIPAC is worried they will be particularly effective at moving the rest of the Democratic Party toward opposing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and supporting some limits on aid to Israel. Malinowski said an AIPAC official told him earlier this year that the organization was most concerned about the influence of centrist critics of Israel. “They’ve decided that moderate pro-Israel Democrats who are willing to criticize Netanyahu are a bigger problem for them than outright anti-Zionists,” Malinowski told Jewish Currents. Biss said he understood why AIPAC sees him as a threat. “AIPAC wants to be able to dismiss any criticism of the conduct of the current Israeli government as being from people who are against the idea of Israel existing as a Jewish democratic state in the first place, and who are knee jerk, reflexively opposed,” he said. “They can’t pull it off with someone like me, and that worries them.”

snip

[harumph]

1. In a sense this is good because the mask has come down.

Criticism of Bibi and Likud and fellow travelers is sold as antisemitism by these motherfuckers.
I hope more people are on to their cheap-ass and frankly embarrassing ploy. It's similar to republicans wearing fucking flag pins and criticizing those who choose not to as being anti-patriotic.

[Intractable]

2. How about AIPAC just buy the weapons instead of our politicians?

I'm sure Israel gets orders of magnitude more in return for AIPAC's investment.

Both Schumer and Jeffries take AIPAC money. It's a problem.

[Celerity]

3. 80 members (15%) of the current US Congress have AIPAC as their all-time top contributor per OpenSecrets reports.

https://www.trackaipac.com/shame

Figures listed reflect total spending by all pro-Israel PACs and their bundlers that we have identified.

8 Senators. 72 Representatives.
36 Republicans. 44 Democrats.

a selection of Dems and Rethugs already in the Senate and the House:

https://www.trackaipac.com/congress

[Intractable]

4. Sometimes, we think Congress is the worst, but they really are the best Congress money can buy!

[leftstreet]

5. Watching this self-own trainwreck is gold

[no_hypocrisy]

6. Same old meme: The wrong kind of Jew.