Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IcyPeas

(25,405 posts)
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 05:32 PM 15 hrs ago

Rep. Neguse resolution to overturn Citizens United

YES. YES. YES.


My resolution to overturn the Supreme Court’s disastrous Citizens United decision — H.J.Res 122 — has now been co-sponsored by 72 Members of Congress. You can view the full list at: www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c....

I’ll keep fighting to get it across the finish line!

Rep. Joe Neguse (@neguse.house.gov) 2026-03-20T13:30:44.816Z


41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Neguse resolution to overturn Citizens United (Original Post) IcyPeas 15 hrs ago OP
Behind this effort 100 percent! Drum 15 hrs ago #1
Me TOO! lastlib 15 hrs ago #2
small point: lastlib 15 hrs ago #3
Oops. Fixed. Thanks IcyPeas 15 hrs ago #4
Give him time .... Tasmanian Devil 15 hrs ago #6
He's not my rep, BUT madamesilverspurs 14 hrs ago #14
And I am stuck with crank, who is worse than his predecessor, lumpy lamborn. niyad 13 hrs ago #20
OMG ABC123Easy 15 hrs ago #5
They're more loyal to the almighty dollar than to the country AZ8theist 13 hrs ago #18
DING DING DING! OldBaldy1701E 27 min ago #39
You GO, Congressman! GiqueCee 15 hrs ago #7
This MUST be done LilElf70 14 hrs ago #8
Hear, hear peppertree 14 hrs ago #9
Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! And Yes!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a winner IF we can get people to understand what it is, so important!! Cheezoholic 14 hrs ago #10
We need to find a way to explain these things with humor - general, not "pointed" humor at an individual's politics. colorado_ufo 14 hrs ago #11
Agree. It's one of those terms that doesn't sound like what it is. IcyPeas 11 hrs ago #25
We need this to save us from billionaires like Musk, Ellison, etc. ShazamIam 14 hrs ago #12
THIS! TY, Rep and co-sponsores! electric_blue68 14 hrs ago #13
Shine a light in dark places Seinan Sensei 13 hrs ago #15
Right on. byronius 13 hrs ago #16
This has to happen. badhair77 13 hrs ago #17
Add it to the $200 billion Iran bill you have to authorize Augiedog 13 hrs ago #19
ding, this !!!!!!!!! AllaN01Bear 13 hrs ago #21
This bill was introduced last September, apparently. niyad 13 hrs ago #22
Correct. See this link (this is the link in Neguse's post) IcyPeas 11 hrs ago #24
Yes, I saw it. niyad 10 hrs ago #33
Sounds great, but guess who will strike it down as being "unconstitutional" Wednesdays 12 hrs ago #23
I think you are right. How can a "resolution" overturn... reACTIONary 11 hrs ago #27
OK, Here is the answer.... reACTIONary 11 hrs ago #28
Mt. Everest was once a very big hill to climb..... lastlib 11 hrs ago #29
This is a proposal for a constitutional amendment. And it is indeed a very big hill to climb. n/t thesquanderer 10 hrs ago #31
Yes wendyb-NC 11 hrs ago #26
So, what exactly his resolution? It is H.J.Res.122 - Proposing..... reACTIONary 11 hrs ago #30
Overturning Citizens United would be a big deal jfz9580m 10 hrs ago #32
Neguse is my rep!! evemac 9 hrs ago #34
DURec leftstreet 9 hrs ago #35
Not a single republican. OGBuzz 9 hrs ago #36
Am I wrong in thinking that a "resolution" like this may be to gauge support, or at least encourage a debate and..... FadedMullet 9 hrs ago #37
Corporations, Organizations, Religions, and Associations and other gangs DO NOT... BurnDoubt 6 hrs ago #38
A constitutional amendment is way too far around the barn ColoradoHoosier 3 min ago #40
YAY! Let's all damn the idea and say 'Not a chance!' GenThePerservering 2 min ago #41

lastlib

(28,173 posts)
2. Me TOO!
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 05:36 PM
15 hrs ago

This should be the litmus test for ALL candidates at EVERY level, for EVERY office!

madamesilverspurs

(16,504 posts)
14. He's not my rep, BUT
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 07:27 PM
14 hrs ago

He makes it a point to spend lots of time in CD8, knowing that Gabe Evans is worse than useless. We are always delighted to have him here.

.

ABC123Easy

(257 posts)
5. OMG
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 06:18 PM
15 hrs ago

Only 72?????
Only 72?????

OMG, how are our representatives NOT in favor of this?

WTF???

OldBaldy1701E

(11,053 posts)
39. DING DING DING!
Sat Mar 21, 2026, 09:02 AM
27 min ago

We have a winner here!

(Of course, most of us are, but that is another issue.)

peppertree

(23,300 posts)
9. Hear, hear
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 06:40 PM
14 hrs ago

Sadly - there isn't a single GOPee congresscritter who wouldn't rather feed their wives to a lion, than allow this bill to pass.

(heck - many of them don't even need that)

Cheezoholic

(3,702 posts)
10. Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! And Yes!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a winner IF we can get people to understand what it is, so important!!
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 06:44 PM
14 hrs ago

When I can chew on someone's ear long enough to explain exactly what it is they usually get that "WTF?" look on their face. Left, right or independent, when it's explained to them they no want it AT ALL! No, no and a hell no. Seriously I can't believe how many of the left leaning/center/independent people I know really don't understand what it is. Right wingers have 0 clue to the point one guy told me he thought it was Bush 1's "Thousand Points of Light" shit made into law (yeah I know. He's a helluva cabinet maker but .... lol). We should pound this into the affordability message like crazy. Once you get some people to understand it it tends to make them see these "tax cuts" completely differently (don't ask me why).

YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


FF!!!

colorado_ufo

(6,247 posts)
11. We need to find a way to explain these things with humor - general, not "pointed" humor at an individual's politics.
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 06:53 PM
14 hrs ago

A way for a person not familiar with the issue to see its absurdity and make them realize that this is something that was never in their favor or self-interest. A way to make an issue "stick" so that more people will grasp it and rise up against it. This is the work of political cartoons, reducing an issue to a simple, visual message; we need to devise verbal "cartoons."

IcyPeas

(25,405 posts)
25. Agree. It's one of those terms that doesn't sound like what it is.
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 10:02 PM
11 hrs ago

Citizens United.... sounds great right? Let's unite as citizens.

Needs a new name that makes it clear what it is.

We have new voters coming of age every year and I wouldn't blame them for not knowing what this is. They may be aware that there's too much money in politics but don't know it didn't use to be like this.

Terms like "Super Pacs" and "Citizens United"

I just looked at the Wikipedia entry for CU and it says:

The Citizens United ruling was highly controversial and remains a subject of widespread public discussion


...widespread public discussion??? It is? Where? I guess I'm not seeing this.




Seinan Sensei

(1,527 posts)
15. Shine a light in dark places
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 07:32 PM
13 hrs ago

Or at the very least, require all lawmakers to wear one of those NASCAR-style jumpsuits, with patches of sponsors and donors sewn everywhere

badhair77

(5,176 posts)
17. This has to happen.
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 07:34 PM
13 hrs ago

We need to fight for this. Best news I heard today, that an effort even exists.

Wednesdays

(22,505 posts)
23. Sounds great, but guess who will strike it down as being "unconstitutional"
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 09:05 PM
12 hrs ago


The only thing that will be bulletproof is a constitutional amendment, and that's a very big hill to climb.

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
27. I think you are right. How can a "resolution" overturn...
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 10:14 PM
11 hrs ago

... a supreme court decision, especially one rooted in the first amendment?

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
28. OK, Here is the answer....
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 10:16 PM
11 hrs ago

.... "H.J.Res.122 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States..."

Not. A. Chance.

lastlib

(28,173 posts)
29. Mt. Everest was once a very big hill to climb.....
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 10:19 PM
11 hrs ago

(and still is.....), but hundreds go for it every year. We can do it IF we work hard enough for it!

thesquanderer

(12,992 posts)
31. This is a proposal for a constitutional amendment. And it is indeed a very big hill to climb. n/t
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 10:51 PM
10 hrs ago

wendyb-NC

(4,677 posts)
26. Yes
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 10:13 PM
11 hrs ago

It has to go. It's aim is to let the wealthy to buy the Government Leasdership that will work for them

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
30. So, what exactly his resolution? It is H.J.Res.122 - Proposing.....
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 10:20 PM
11 hrs ago

..... H.J.Res.122 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

There is no chance of this going anywhere.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/122/text

FadedMullet

(894 posts)
37. Am I wrong in thinking that a "resolution" like this may be to gauge support, or at least encourage a debate and.....
Sat Mar 21, 2026, 12:29 AM
9 hrs ago

......require public positions be taken by reps? This as a precursor to the house debating and hopefully passing (by two-thirds) a proposal by the house for such an amendment and sending it to the Senate?

BurnDoubt

(1,661 posts)
38. Corporations, Organizations, Religions, and Associations and other gangs DO NOT...
Sat Mar 21, 2026, 03:06 AM
6 hrs ago

Have a HEARTBEAT. They are NOT CITIZENS.
Beyond that, an individual should be allowed political donations in the amount of $1,000.00 aggregate total, and must show proof of citizenship. At least most citizens might be able to afford to make a donation that might have some impact. You can guess the relative impact of Millions of Dollars versus Hundreds of Dollars in the mis-dis-information campaigns we endure for months-on-end.
Citizens United is “OPEN BORDERS” Wild West logic (tune in to “Deadwood” for an illustration), and the damage and chaos done to our Nation is obvious and indisputable. Oligarchs and Billionaires have influence across all aspects of our political spectrum, and can actually buy influence far beyond the 99%.
The Heritage Foundation used its influence to pack the Supreme Court (The "Clarence Tomas Winnebago Gambit”), and steer their agenda through Congress.
Never forget the hue and cry when citizens intrude on THEIR business and try to tell them how to behave (Global Warming, anybody?).
Speech is Speech.
Money is money.
See the difference???

ColoradoHoosier

(39 posts)
40. A constitutional amendment is way too far around the barn
Sat Mar 21, 2026, 09:26 AM
3 min ago

The only way to “overturn” CU is to first expand the court to 13 justices, one for each district, then you begin to target individual parts of CU, focusing on political bribery, by passing laws against them. I don’t think a constitutional amendment of any kind could happen in this country ever again; the chasm is too great. The only way we might ever come together for a common goal is if we were invaded by aliens from another galaxy, and all herded into the same ‘pen’.

GenThePerservering

(3,302 posts)
41. YAY! Let's all damn the idea and say 'Not a chance!'
Sat Mar 21, 2026, 09:27 AM
2 min ago

And not even bother trying to climb that hill! Not bother to fight. Just give up.

So much winning. 🙄

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Neguse resolution to...