Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BootinUp

(51,261 posts)
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 10:35 PM 8 hrs ago

U.S. Navy Nuclear Aircraft Carrier USS Gerald R. Ford Might Be Out of Action for 14 Months

Max Boot
10m
@maxboot


Trump/Hegseth push the Gerald R. Ford—the world’s most expensive and sophisticated warship—toward a record-setting deployment to support Trump’s attacks on Venezuela and Iran. This is the result.

https://substack.com/@maxboot/note/c-231827720

The U.S. Navy faces a potential “aircraft carrier crunch” as its most advanced warship, the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), sits at Souda Bay undergoing damage assessment. The transition from active combat in the Red Sea to a shipyard in Crete marks a critical pause in Operation Epic Fury, highlighting the physical and industrial limits of 21st-century naval power.


ByJack BuckbyPublished2 days ago
Google News

ATLANTIC OCEAN (Oct. 29, 2019) USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) conducts high-speed turns in the Atlantic Ocean. Ford is at sea conducting sea trials following the in port portion of its 15 month post-shakedown availability.


-Currently docked at Souda Bay, Crete, the first-in-class supercarrier has completed a grueling nine-month deployment supporting over 7,000 strikes against Iran.

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2026/03/u-s-navy-nuclear-aircraft-carrier-uss-gerald-r-ford-might-be-out-of-action-for-14-months/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Navy Nuclear Aircraft Carrier USS Gerald R. Ford Might Be Out of Action for 14 Months (Original Post) BootinUp 8 hrs ago OP
When you give children toys that they don't respect, UpInArms 8 hrs ago #1
Anybody think it was hit JBTaurus83 7 hrs ago #2
No sarisataka 7 hrs ago #3
Intentionally set? Tasmanian Devil 7 hrs ago #4
I hadn't thought of that JBTaurus83 7 hrs ago #6
My understanding is that fires in that part of the ship are not unheard of BootinUp 7 hrs ago #5
A lint fire that does that much damage to such a valuable military instrument in PufPuf23 7 hrs ago #7
In submarines. The laundry dryers are considered high risk with a watch posted while operating. Melon 7 hrs ago #8
The toilets didn't work either. hunter 6 hrs ago #9

UpInArms

(54,909 posts)
1. When you give children toys that they don't respect,
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 10:53 PM
8 hrs ago

the toys generally get abused and broken

Tasmanian Devil

(148 posts)
4. Intentionally set?
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 11:09 PM
7 hrs ago

Much more believable are the rumors that the laundry room fire was intentionally set.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/us-navy-investigates-sabotage-uss-gerald-r-ford-fire-1786273

'They Were Extended. Then Extended Again' — USS Gerald R Ford Sailors Now Suspected of Sabotage to Avoid Continuing Deployment

The US Navy is investigating whether sailors aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford deliberately started the fire that tore through the aircraft carrier's main laundry spaces on 12 March — a blaze that took more than 30 hours to extinguish and left over 600 crew members without proper sleeping quarters. The carrier, the most expensive warship ever built, is now diverting to Souda Naval Base in Crete for repairs and a formal investigation into the incident, according to sources with direct knowledge of the planned port call.

The investigation explicitly includes the possibility of deliberate sabotage by crew members, with one theory suggesting the fire was intentionally set to interrupt the carrier's lengthy and repeatedly extended mission. The Ford has now entered its tenth month of deployment, with crew members told their assignment will likely stretch into May — twice the length of a normal aircraft carrier deployment.


BootinUp

(51,261 posts)
5. My understanding is that fires in that part of the ship are not unheard of
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 11:10 PM
7 hrs ago

NAPLES, Italy — A potent mixture of flammable materials, equipment pushed beyond its limits and human error could be behind a fire last week aboard the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, according to a shipping expert. “It’s just a smorgasbord of danger all put together,” said Sal Mercogliano, an adjunct professor at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. The Ford, along with nearly 4,500 personnel, is operating in the Red Sea in support of Operation Epic Fury, the ongoing joint American and Israeli military campaign against Iran. The carrier left Norfolk, Va., in late June for a then-routine deployment to Europe that unexpectedly included duty in the Caribbean Sea and the Middle East. That extended time at sea also could have been a factor in the March 12 fire in the main laundry areas, Mercogliano said. “Equipment that normally would be serviced and taken down may be running at levels past when they need to run,” Mercogliano said. “Anytime you go past normal operating hours, the chances of mechanical and human error increase.”

Read more at: https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2026-03-18/fire-ford-red-sea-iran-sailors-21107086.html
Source - Stars and Stripes

PufPuf23

(9,819 posts)
7. A lint fire that does that much damage to such a valuable military instrument in
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 11:38 PM
7 hrs ago

the first day of what is potentially the start of WWIII is an epic failure of command.

Melon

(1,499 posts)
8. In submarines. The laundry dryers are considered high risk with a watch posted while operating.
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 11:49 PM
7 hrs ago
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Navy Nuclear Aircraf...