Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shouldn't we be celebrating Newt doing well (Original Post) brettdale Jan 2012 OP
Barney Frank certainly is! nt MADem Jan 2012 #1
Neither of those two pigs would be cause for me to celebrate anything about them for the next 10 lonestarnot Jan 2012 #2
I think the majority of republicans are sick of them already too :) Tx4obama Jan 2012 #5
actually oldhippydude Jan 2012 #7
You know Jeb DonCoquixote Jan 2012 #10
Well its a double-edged sword Obamacare Jan 2012 #3
It never good... daleanime Jan 2012 #4
+1 DCBob Jan 2012 #8
every once in a while oldhippydude Jan 2012 #6
He's the most dangerous candidate out there. sofa king Jan 2012 #9
No. We can smile inwardly, but it ain't over 'til it's over JHB Jan 2012 #11
I agree he's fun to run against. But no, Dems shouldn't celebrate. Bucky Jan 2012 #12
As broken as our electoral system seems to be deutsey Jan 2012 #13
 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
2. Neither of those two pigs would be cause for me to celebrate anything about them for the next 10
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:50 AM
Jan 2012

months. I am sick of all of them already.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
5. I think the majority of republicans are sick of them already too :)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 07:29 AM
Jan 2012

Let's just hope that the Republicans do not have a brokered convention and come up with someone better than the four candidates that they currently have!

 

Obamacare

(277 posts)
3. Well its a double-edged sword
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:57 AM
Jan 2012

Obama would most definitely win, but the win would come with cost. Noot would polarize the electorate with his racist rhetoric. I believe old Noot would go full birhter, demanding a copy of Obama's long form BC. I'd say bring it on, I think winning is more important. Furthermore, all the idiot racist/birthers etc will just end up embarrassing themselves worldwide.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
8. +1
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 07:55 AM
Jan 2012

Yes, even if Gingrich might be easier to be it is not good to give him a national platform for the crap he is spewing.

oldhippydude

(2,514 posts)
6. every once in a while
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 07:44 AM
Jan 2012

i remember 1980.. the common wisdom was that let the Republicans run Reagan, he's unelectable.. well the Iranian hostage situation, and a stubborn recession, took it's toll on the Carter administration.. that was the election that started the rightward swing.. things have never been the same since..

of concern to me, is the unlimited funds of citizens united, the "voter fruad" rules enacted by many states, and the hacking of voting machines.. could make this election anything but certain..

with the Republican domination of the corporate media, (notably fokkks el el), the voters may again vote against their own best intrests

with folks like Karl Rove, expect a lot of dirty tricks.. whoever they run!!

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
9. He's the most dangerous candidate out there.
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:00 AM
Jan 2012

Newt Gingrich is what we used to call a sociopath. The DSM has been rewritten to remove any genetic components from the definition, but go ahead and read this and see if you don't see Newt staring back at you:

A) There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three or more of the following:

* failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest;
* deception, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;
* impulsiveness or failure to plan ahead;
* irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults;
* reckless disregard for safety of self or others;
* consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations;
* lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder

So there's our guy, remorseless, impulsive, and unbound by conscience or decency. Once he gets close enough to strike, we should assume that he will attempt to kill everyone in his way to get what he wants.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
11. No. We can smile inwardly, but it ain't over 'til it's over
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:49 AM
Jan 2012

Remember the saying about "who laughs last, laughs best", and do the celebrating after the election results are in.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
12. I agree he's fun to run against. But no, Dems shouldn't celebrate.
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:53 AM
Jan 2012

I don't like to see any American taken in by a flim flam artist. I don't like to see any hate monger elevated to a position of authority and influence. I'd like to see the Republican Party grow up a little--become the party of Eisenhower and of George Romney again. Republicans will win again in the future, quite probably in 2016, given how history flows. I'd like to see them reject their culture of hate and divisiveness before then.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
13. As broken as our electoral system seems to be
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 09:19 AM
Jan 2012

I'm concerned someone like Newt can find a way to slither through the cracks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Shouldn't we be celebrati...