Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Approves TSA Funding, Now the Fun Begins
Today on TAP: The measure financing most of the Department of Homeland Security has nothing constraining the actions of ICE. But to get ICE more funding, Republicans have a tall task.by Robert Kuttner
March 27, 2026
Just after 2:20 Friday morning, the Senate voted by unanimous consent to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security, including TSA, for the remainder of this fiscal year through June. The funding excludes money for ICE and Customs and Border Protection. The measure then headed to the House for final passage.
Why did both parties suddenly take this deal? On the one hand, Democrats had introduced legislation that looked essentially like this since before the shutdown; why did Republicans finally agree? Meanwhile, there are no concessions on limiting ICEs behavior, of the kind that Democrats have been demanding for weeks; why did Democrats allow that to happen?
snip*
According to Senate Republican leader John Thune, who professed to be unhappy with todays deal, the Senate will take up ICE and CBP funding later this year in a reconciliation bill, where passage would take only 50 votes. As my colleague David Dayen reported, that bill will be very difficult for Republicans to pass. Between Trumps immigration Gestapo, as much as $200 billion for the ill-begotten war in Iran, and funding cuts to federal benefits (including more cuts to health care, disguised as fraud prevention), its likely to be one of the most unpopular bills in American history.
Add in the complication that House hard-linersand Trumpare insistent on attaching his voter suppression tool called the SAVE Act, which isnt budgetary and will likely get kicked out of reconciliation, and you have a complicated dance to get to an absolute majority in either chamber.
https://prospect.org/2026/03/27/tsa-gets-funding-congress-dhs-ice/
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Approves TSA Funding, Now the Fun Begins (Original Post)
Passages
14 hrs ago
OP
Well, it looks like this won't fly. But if it did, our Senators just agreed to the plan that would
Scrivener7
10 hrs ago
#3
Scrivener7
(59,476 posts)1. We've been had. Again.
Passages
(4,140 posts)2. Our odds may not be that bad considering.
Scrivener7
(59,476 posts)3. Well, it looks like this won't fly. But if it did, our Senators just agreed to the plan that would
allow for the reconciliation bill to hand ICE more money without agreeing to any of our demands and with just 50 votes.
It is ridiculous that they agreed to this, and it is ridiculous that Jeffries was saying we'll agree to anything that would get pay for TSA.
I feel for TSA. But we better not come out of this agreeing to give ICE more money while allowing them to continue to trample the most basic civil rights of every American.
Passages
(4,140 posts)4. I agree, but I see they still have an opportunity b/c I don't think the odds
of the cons pulling off funding in reconciliation is all that great.