Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,394 posts)
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 12:23 PM 14 hrs ago

The Trump-voting pastor Democrats think could cost them a chance at a Nebraska Senate seat

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/30/politics/nebraska-senate-trump-pastor



In Nebraska’s Senate race, a Trump-supporting, anti-abortion pastor is running as a Democrat. The state’s Democratic Party — which is backing an independent candidate — says he’s a Republican plant. And another Democratic primary candidate says she’s running just to stop him.

The unusual dynamic has roiled the Senate contest in deep-red Nebraska, turning into a high-stakes test of Democrats’ unconventional strategy — skipping their own primary to back independent Dan Osborn, in their effort to defeat incumbent Republican Sen. Pete Ricketts. Osborn can run straight to the general election without facing a primary.

William Forbes, a 79-year-old pastor from rural Nebraska, entered the Democratic primary just before the filing deadline in early March, upending a carefully coordinated plan by state Democrats to clear the field for Osborn. To oppose Forbes, another candidate, Cindy Burbank, also filed at the last minute on the Democratic primary ticket but has had her candidacy challenged by the state Republican Party and Nebraska’s Republican secretary of state.

In an interview with CNN, Forbes said he’s voted for President Donald Trump in multiple elections but denied being a Republican plant, insisting that he’s a lifelong Democrat. Asked repeatedly to name a Democrat he voted for, Forbes grew frustrated and said the party needed to return to the “morality” it represented under President John F. Kennedy.

snip
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Celerity

(54,394 posts)
2. I am so not an expert on Nebraska's Democratic Party, but it would seem so. I so hope they can stop this MAGAt POS.
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 12:33 PM
13 hrs ago

sop

(18,585 posts)
3. Most of these faux Democrats aren't so obvious; they usually play the part really well to get elected, then when
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 12:36 PM
13 hrs ago

their vote on an important progressive issue becomes crucial, they show their true colors.

Raven123

(7,793 posts)
4. Realistically, Do Dems have a chance of winning this seat?
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 12:58 PM
13 hrs ago

If so, I hope they are investing in the effort to inform the electorate?

karynnj

(60,963 posts)
6. I wonder why instead of having a real Democrat running who intends to endorse the independent,
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 01:07 PM
13 hrs ago

they didn't do what VT has done in many House and now Senate elections for Bernie. He runs on the Democratic line making it clear he will run as independent in the general election. Even if Democrats ran a write in campaign in the primary for him, wouldn't that be an easier way to get to him being the independent candidate endorsed by the Democrats?

Celerity

(54,394 posts)
8. Bernie caucuses with the US Senate Dems though. I thought Osborn would not caucus with either Party.
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 01:09 PM
13 hrs ago

karynnj

(60,963 posts)
9. Thanks, that makes sense
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 01:12 PM
13 hrs ago

Given that the Nebraska Democratic party is publicly supporting him, I wrongly assumed he, like Bernie and King, would caucus with the Democrats.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Trump-voting pastor D...