Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

EYESORE 9001

(29,737 posts) Thu Apr 2, 2026, 01:58 PM 10 hrs ago

I wonder whether Pam Bondi's ouster

is a ploy to make her the designated piñata for the inevitable return of the Epstein files. She was up to her eyeballs in covering for the monster as AG of Florida, after all. Personally, I wish she’d just cut a deal for hersellf, although I think it’d be very dangerous for her and family members.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I wonder whether Pam Bondi's ouster (Original Post) EYESORE 9001 10 hrs ago OP

Just call it Thursday Raven123 10 hrs ago #1

She wasn't dishonest and cruel enough? Walleye 10 hrs ago #2

Stolen files CDs Whip-poor-will 10 hrs ago #3

Does it exempt her from having to testify? jmbar2 9 hrs ago #4

Raven123

(7,807 posts)

1. Just call it Thursday

Reply to EYESORE 9001 (Original post)

Thu Apr 2, 2026, 02:01 PM

10 hrs ago

Trump has to do something regularly to focus on himself. Big bad boss firing people.

Sure there may be other reasons, but this is just Trump being Trump.

IMO

Walleye

(44,829 posts)

2. She wasn't dishonest and cruel enough?

Reply to EYESORE 9001 (Original post)

Thu Apr 2, 2026, 02:12 PM

10 hrs ago

Whip-poor-will

(254 posts)

3. Stolen files CDs

Reply to EYESORE 9001 (Original post)

Thu Apr 2, 2026, 02:30 PM

10 hrs ago

Wonder if she stole some files like her boss ?

A little insurance policy.

The worm turns

jmbar2

(7,991 posts)

4. Does it exempt her from having to testify?

Reply to EYESORE 9001 (Original post)

Thu Apr 2, 2026, 03:00 PM

9 hrs ago

She was scheduled to testify before a House Oversight committee in mid-April. Does this allow her to skip? If so, it was to protect the perpetrators of sex abuse crimes.

Reply to this discussion