General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTwo issues on our rape culture and one party system.
First, Trump and many of his cadre have been,
and still are, sexual predators and traffickers
of the worst kind... and are widely known
of this and accused of it, boom
There is literally no law or accountabilityfor
Republicans.
Secondly, America has been a rape and slave
culture from the day of its founding to now.
We live in a very sick society.
My other issue is this. Why did the Swalwell
accusers wait so long?
WhiskeyGrinder
(27,014 posts)Victims tend not to speak out because they feel ashamed or alone, and that people will question them, because there's no right time to speak out about it.
Chasstev365
(7,883 posts)One accuser stated Swalwell assulted her when she was drunk in 2019 and did it again in 2023. If the person assulted you once, why would you put yourself in the same exact situation a second time?
On the other hand, publicly apologizing to your wife for "past mistakes" gives creedence to the accusations.
In any event, if people wanted to take down Swalwell it has worked and if the accusations are true, Swalwell is not worthy of holding elected office.
All of it is extremely troubling.
WhiskeyGrinder
(27,014 posts)Because we live in a rape culture. It happens once and you convince yourself it was a one-off, that maybe you dont remember it quite right, that maybe you sent out the wrong signals. Whatever happened, you know it was morally or ethically or spiritually wrong but impossible to prove legally. Hes a powerful man and youve heard the rumors and you should have known better. How could you have been so dumb? You thought you were savvier than the others, but no. But you love this work and the people you work with and there are 100 people behind you who would love to get where you are. You cant jeopardize that. So youll be careful this time. Now you really do know better. Youre a good team player. You wont rock the boat. You dont want to be seen as a troublemaker. Itll be different this time.
yardwork
(69,414 posts)Posters with genuine questions about why victims of sexual assault do certain things could read up on the psychology of trauma.
Or they could simply read your succinct and accurate posts here and reflect on them.
We don't know if Swalwell's accusers are telling the truth or not but everyone deserves to have their accusations investigated without bias. And no survivor of abuse deserves to be blamed.
EdmondDantes_
(1,874 posts)Chasstev365
(7,883 posts)Disagree with me all you want, but why did you feel the need to attack me personally?
WhiskeyGrinder
(27,014 posts)decide what to do next.
yardwork
(69,414 posts)They aren't accusing you of being dumb. They're speaking in the voice of a survivor of sexual assault. Victims often feel shame, self-doubt, and they blame themselves. That's why they stay in the relationship.
Predators know this and take advantage of it.
ananda
(35,246 posts)All of it is extremely troubling.
rampartd
(4,704 posts)especially the "sick society"
i guess that is why grok wants to take civilization back to the stone age.
ananda
(35,246 posts)When women knew their place, and Blacks
worked in the fields.
RoeVWade
(901 posts)Then it looks like he's not admitting even to sexual relations with any women, which doesn't add up with the text messages recorded.
I'm sorry to say that too. But it hasn't been very long yet, so I will still wait and see what else may come out about this and how accurate all the information is.
Lonestarblue
(13,506 posts)I remember how Franken was railroaded out of office, partly with "evidence" most likely created by Roger Stone and deliberate misinterpretation of photos.
ananda
(35,246 posts)My issue isn't with that.
It's that he's a Dem and subject to the law and
accountability, while Republicans who are far
worse skate.
yardwork
(69,414 posts)Why did accusers against Supreme Court nominees Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh come forward when they did?
And we saw what happened. The women weren't believed, they were blamed and their lives destroyed, and we have... two sexual predators on the SCOTUS.
ananda
(35,246 posts)But my point is that Democrats are held to law
and morality, and Republicans aren't.
Democrats even go after their own, like Gillibrand
against Franken, which was a nothingburger
really and so I have never forgiven her.
Ms. Toad
(38,692 posts)mwmisses4289
(4,311 posts)Because in my own life i have known three men who were falsly accused. Hell, one was on a ship in the middle of the pacific when the accuser claimed the supposed assault took place.
I also know women who have been assaulted, and their accusations proved true.
Every time sexual assault accusations come out that prove false, it makes it that much harder for women and men who really have been assaulted to be believed.
Edited to add: Ct here- could this be a way to switch from attention from epstein and M and cast doubt on t accusers?
Auggie
(33,192 posts)i.e., hospital records and collaboration from friends.
Nancy Pelosi has urged his withdraw. My congressional rep, Mike Thompson (D), has dropped his support. They wouldn't do this unless they were certain.
ananda
(35,246 posts)A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
The problem here is that there is already evidence out
there that he did it.
My rant is that I really liked him... and thought he would
make a great governor. This is a let-down I'm not sure
I'll ever recover from.
mwmisses4289
(4,311 posts)It still begs the question- why are dems held to higher standard the repukes?
Based on what is happening to swalwell, t should be kicked out immediately on his lubberworted keister!
ananda
(35,246 posts)Grrr
yardwork
(69,414 posts)We are a very sick society. One of the symptoms is our tendency to quickly blame victims of sexual assault.
There are numerous posts in this thread that shift the blame for sexual assault to victims. "Why did she stay?" Is one. "Why did she put herself in that position?" Is another. "Why did she come forward now?" Etc.
I don't know if Swalwell's accusers are telling the truth or not. What I do know is that many of the posts in this thread cause real harm to people who have survived sexual assaults.
We can learn about trauma and the behaviors it causes.
ananda
(35,246 posts)However, I prefer to think of them as survivors
and while I'm glad they have spoken out,
I'm more upset that our society allows this
with Republicans.
yardwork
(69,414 posts)I agree that it's infuriating and wrong that Republicans never seem to be held accountable.
OC375
(1,048 posts)Its part of the problem with tribes. The utility often beats ethics, because the goals still remain to be achieved. Its endemic to humans in groups, when they compete for resources, unfortunately.
eShirl
(20,297 posts)every single fucking time, this shit is getting old
Mysterian
(6,544 posts)Just a guess.
yardwork
(69,414 posts)mwmisses4289
(4,311 posts)And every time allegations prove to be false, it makes that much harder for real victims and survivors to be believed.
Apparently in this case, though, the allegations are true. Ugh. The gloating from the maga idgits is going to be unbearable!
Ms. Toad
(38,692 posts)That she just stopped fighting about it for her own emotional and sometimes physical health.
mwmisses4289
(4,311 posts)Proven false means just that. The allegation did not hold up to proof.
Making it that much harder for real victims and survivors to be heard and believed.
Quiet Em
(2,955 posts)Rape crimes have the lowest conviction rate.
The burden of proof bar is set very high and difficult to reach do to the very nature of the crime. Even when the victim is willing and able to get DNA through medical attention they still must get over the consent/lack of consent burden.
If a jury is unable to reach a verdict of guilt, as it sadly happens far too often, it does not mean the allegations were proven false.
Ms. Toad
(38,692 posts)Juries still struggle to convict rapists, and not guilty does not mean the allegation was false - it means that the prosecution (the state, not the woman) did not prove to the jury that the person committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. To prove the allegation was wrong, a convicted person would need to seek an actual innocence finding.
The accuser found liable in a civil court? That number is vanishingly small. And, civil juries are just as likely to disbelieve women in liable cases against them as they are in criminal cases?
Complaint withdrawn? Many women just give up and withdraw their claims after being bullied into it by the accuser, family, friends, media, and people asserting things like a ridiculously high rate of false reports.
I am unaware of a single forum (aside from a civil defamation suit) in which an accuser is proven to have made a false accusation.
mwmisses4289
(4,311 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,692 posts)How are you establishing "proven"?
As I've noted, using the process of proving (actual innocence or a civil defamation suit) are vanishingly small.
And rescinding an allegation does not prove it is wrong. In way too may cases, it means the accuser has been beaten down.
So, for the third time, by what means are these vast numbers of allegations proven to be false.
mwmisses4289
(4,311 posts)Nor did I claim "vast numbers" of allegations are proven false- only that false allegations are more common than people think.
The three cases that I know of, all of them were dismissed when the accused provided documentation that proved they were not anywhere near the places where the accusers claimed the assault happened, thus proving the allegations were false.
Were these accusers assaulted? Maybe, but if they were, it wasn't by the ones they had accused.
Ms. Toad
(38,692 posts)Dismissing claims is not the same as proving the allegations false. Documentation can be and had been falsified - especially by buddies of the accused trying to save him from a felony.
And, especially if any significant time has passed, memories fade as to the precise times.
But the bottom line is that dismissing a case (even with prejudice) does not prove the allegations was false. It means it was the assessment of the prosecutor or judge - not that the accuser was lying - but that there wasn't enough evidence to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt that they were true.
Ms. Toad
(38,692 posts)Many women never share their experiences with anyone. Our society is still set up to believe the man, to demand cold hard proof where there often is none because if the mature of the crime. Every woman has seen this happen and it serves as a warning to keep quiet or be accused of lying (either about it happening or about our lack of consent) or of asking for it.
I shared my fourth story immediately with my family, and my mother's first comment was, "were you doing something you shouldn't have been doing?" The police arrested the man who raped me, put him in jail overnight to give him a scare, but declined to press charges, even though they knew I was the 13th victim with a nearly identical story.
It was at least a decade before I shared my first and second story. I never shared my third.
It took a couple of years before I shared my 5th story - I delayed that because we were members of an affinity group. I was in a leadership role. He was about to be appointed to one and the thought of him being in a role in which part of his responsibilities was to help ensure that all physical and emotional intimacy was consensual. But for that appointment, I would have just kept staying out of his way
Determining when and who to tell doesn't have rules, partly because the reaction to our stories can do a lot of emotional damage at a time we need to be healing; partly because society convinces we were the only one: partly because society convinces us nothing will be done to the abuser so why bother. And sometimes, something happens that makes remaining silent a worse option than speaking up. Other women come forward and we realize that if we had spoken up he might not have had so many b victims. And sometimes, like me, as to my 5th abuser, the need to speak up is triggered because the person who abused me is about to rise into a role we can't bear to think of him in
yardwork
(69,414 posts)That's very courageous of you. I'm sorry that happened to you.
Ms. Toad
(38,692 posts)I am privileged enough to be in an emotional state where I can do so without personal emotional repercussions - regardless of how it is perceived, and secure enough in work, family, community relations, etc. That doing so won't cause any significant harm. And I have as strong personal and professional reputation for truth telling..
It is always a woman's choice to decide when, and to whom, to disclose. I don't blame any woman for choosing not to disclose, or for disclosing later than many think it's credible. But I also think it is important for people similarly situated to me to tell out stories - in party to make it easier for those who follow.
GreenWave
(12,680 posts)Wednesdays
(22,727 posts)Ask Christine Blasey Ford.
bigtree
(94,375 posts)...and having to deal the flak that comes with accusing powerful men, and having to deal with bullshit defenses like waiting too long; a deflection which doesn't actually address any evidence presented.
Her own words:
I went to the bathroom. I dont remember anything after that.
I can see flashes of that evening. Him on top of me. Me pushing him off. Him grabbing me. It was a lot more aggressive.
Says he refused to stop.
CNN corroborated her account with medical records, text messages sent the same week, and interviews with her partner, mother, and two friends.
Swalwells response was to send her a cease-and-desist letter the day after CNN contacted his campaign.
https://www.newsbreak.com/mediaite-520570/4586783954501-swalwell-rape-accuser-speaks-out-on-cnn-in-harrowing-interview-i-was-pushing-him-off-of-me-saying-no