Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,783 posts)
Sun May 31, 2026, 08:25 PM 21 hrs ago

MaddowBlog-Treasury Department's top lawyer resigns following 'slush fund' announcement

Team Trump announced its deal on Monday afternoon, and Brian Morrissey resigned hours later. There’s new reporting suggesting this was not a coincidence.

Treasury Department’s top lawyer resigns following ‘slush fund’ announcement - MS NOW apple.news/AQ9_jVq5LQf2...

LOUISE Rose (@louise0202.bsky.social) 2026-05-27T14:52:28.603Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/treasury-departments-top-lawyer-resigns-following-slush-fund-announcement

With this in mind, it was of great interest to see Brian Morrissey, the Treasury Department’s top lawyer, resign immediately after the deal was announced, just seven months into his tenure.

Though Morrissey didn’t comment publicly on why he was quitting, there’s been some additional reporting on his motivations. The New York Times reported:

The top lawyer at the Treasury Department, Brian Morrissey, resigned on Monday over his concerns about the resolution to Mr. Trump’s lawsuit against the I.R.S., three people familiar with his thinking said.

The reporting has not been independently verified by MS NOW, though if the Times’ account is correct, it would suggest the timing — the administration announced the deal on Monday afternoon, and Morrissey exited the administration unexpectedly just hours later — was not a coincidence, his silence about his motivations notwithstanding.....

Eleven months later, political considerations surrounding the IRS seemed rather obvious.

If recent history is any guide, the White House will likely admonish Morrissey as some kind of “RINO” (“Republican in name only”), though it’s worth emphasizing that he was a Trump appointee who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Nothing about his record screams “moderate.”

As for the larger pattern, examples of Trump administration officials resigning in protest are rare — it made Joe Kent’s departure in March as the director of the National Counterterrorism Center stand out — which makes the Times’ reporting on Morrissey that much more notable.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MaddowBlog-Treasury Department's top lawyer resigns following 'slush fund' announcement (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 21 hrs ago OP
MaddowBlog-Trump to abandon $1.776 billion compensation fund amid bipartisan backlash, source says LetMyPeopleVote 1 hr ago #1

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,783 posts)
1. MaddowBlog-Trump to abandon $1.776 billion compensation fund amid bipartisan backlash, source says
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 04:05 PM
1 hr ago

The president was left with a choice: Keep fighting an uphill battle or back down from a fight he was likely to lose. He apparently went with the latter.

www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

BREAKING NEW

Trump to abandon .776 billion compensation fund amid bipartisan backlash, source says

The president was left with a choice: Keep fighting an uphill battle or back down from a fight he was likely to lose. He apparently went with the latter.

😊

LunaLuvgood2020 (@lunaluvgood2020.bsky.social) 2026-06-01T19:43:33.262Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-to-drop-anti-weaponization-fund

A few days after the Trump administration unveiled its $1.776 billion compensation fund, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche went to Capitol Hill to brief Senate Republicans on the details and answer their questions. He likely expected some modest pushback, since a handful of GOP senators had already gone on record announcing their opposition to what they described as a “slush fund.”

But Donald Trump’s former defense lawyer probably wasn’t prepared for the ferocity of the response from those in attendance. In fact, we don’t even have to speculate based on leaks from unnamed officials: Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas said on his podcast that his Senate colleagues “screamed” at Blanche, as part of “one of the roughest meetings I’ve seen in my entire time in the Senate.”

Fiery does not begin to cut it,” Cruz added. “My guess is there [were] probably 45 senators in the room; at least half of them were blasting the attorney general, and they were pissed.”....

The president was left with a choice: Keep fighting an uphill battle for a brazenly corrupt scheme or back down from a fight he was likely to lose. He apparently went with the latter.....

By any fair measure, the fund never should’ve existed in the first place, and many legal scholars characterized it as the single most corrupt step ever taken by an American president. The initiative began with an outlandish $10 billion lawsuit Trump filed against his own administration over the leak of his tax returns during his first term, which he dropped as part of an agreement to create a $1.776 billion fund that would compensate “victims” of the Biden administration, notwithstanding the inconvenient fact that Republicans have never been able to identify any actual, legitimate victims.

There are some key questions that have not yet been answered. For example, the day after the administration announced the fund, Blanche unveiled an addendum of sorts, which said the Internal Revenue Service would no longer scrutinize past or present alleged tax irregularities surrounding the president, his family, and his controversial businesses. The development, among other things, freed Trump from having to worry about a potential $100 million penalty.

Whether this arrangement remains intact as the White House backs off from the existence of the fund remains unclear.

We had two different courts challenge this "fund" as to whether it was a "fraud on the court." The DOJ was not up to litigating these issues and so trump backed down
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MaddowBlog-Treasury Depar...