General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFiendish Thingy
(24,919 posts)underpants
(198,139 posts)
Martin68
(28,502 posts)Raven123
(8,116 posts)GiqueCee
(5,311 posts)... an Oscar, a Golden Globe, a Pulitzer, a Gold Star, and a rubber medal so he can wear it in the bathtub! Brilliant!
Even if it is AI, it takes skill to build it, and especially to write the song, and choreograph the dance sequences. Kudos. LMAO!
Agreed
milestogo
(23,501 posts)ColoringFool
(1,631 posts)highplainsdem
(64,075 posts)fraud generator that fraudsters and wannabe creatives love.
IrishAfricanAmerican
(4,563 posts)3catwoman3
(30,447 posts)highplainsdem
(64,075 posts)is subservient to the Trump regime.
No real talent and creativity went into that. It's all based on work stolen from real creatives. Even the basic idea might've come from a chatbot.
It isn't ethical or creative to use genAI. Rightwingers don't care about that, but Democrats should.
highplainsdem
(64,075 posts)because it's meaningless and anyone can generate AI slop in seconds.
What does bother them - what you'll often see them respond to - is being criticized by REAL ARTISTS. People who are really creative and put their own thoughts and creativity into statements, putting careers on the line.
Fake creatives - wannabes - making political AI slop? They're not having any real impact. There are thousands if not millions of pieces of political AI slop generated every day. All of them together aren't nearly as effective as a single statement from a real artist, a professional.
Nor is all that AI slop having the effect that real video, photos, quotes and news stories have.
What all that AI slop does is
1) promote AI and tools and companies owned and controlled by people aligned with Trump, and
2) waste water and electricity.