Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(15,598 posts)
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 12:42 PM 3 hrs ago

Why aren't we hearing more about the satellite system that would spot wildfires?

I've heard on a couple of wonkish interviews about one of the things gutted by Musk's DOGE activities. It was a satellite system designed to spot wildfires in remote forests way earlier than other methods could achieve. ABSOLUTELY what we need to mitigate the Canadian fires. This information should be included in every Democrat's canned speech along with affordability.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why aren't we hearing more about the satellite system that would spot wildfires? (Original Post) LAS14 3 hrs ago OP
Surprise that MTG hasn't brought up "Jewish space lasers." ProudMNDemocrat 3 hrs ago #1
Need more info LAS. Prairie_Seagull 3 hrs ago #2
There is some information here: Jim__ 2 hrs ago #4
Thank you Jim_ Prairie_Seagull 2 hrs ago #5
Probably because Trump is so GD stupid he figures only California has wildfires Bengus81 29 min ago #9
What also pisses me off about this is, ultimately, it's part of an KPN 28 min ago #10
Beat me to it The Blue Flower 2 hrs ago #3
He wanted contracts for SpaceX to replace it. But they didn't develop and deploy a replacement before cancelling program ChicagoTeamster 55 min ago #6
They are going to kill us one way or another. Whyisthisstillclose 52 min ago #7
Who thought we relogic 44 min ago #8
Spotting the fires is not the problem. The problem is our north is dry after years of low rainfall and climate change Bev54 5 min ago #11

Jim__

(15,338 posts)
4. There is some information here:
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 12:59 PM
2 hrs ago
Futurism

...

While they were at it, the Trump administration also ripped up a project that would have vastly improved the country’s ability to monitor wildfires. The GeoXO program was a project originally encompassing six satellites that would greatly improve the resolution available to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to monitor atmospheric conditions like wildfire smoke, as well as weather events like lightning strikes, and climate observations such as color changes in the ocean’s surface.

The six satellites were meant to encompass three regions split between the US West, Central, and East. Starting in April 2025, however, the Trump administration directed the NOAA to make drastic cuts to GeoXO. These included cutting two satellites from the mission altogether — scrapping the central observation region entirely — and canceling major contracts for existing GeoXO instruments. The purported goal was to refocus the program on a “core weather mission,” as opposed to long-term climate monitoring, following the administration’s broader attacks on any effort to mitigate or even mention climate change.

One of those cancelled instruments, the GeoXO Atmospheric Composition device, was a high-resolution spectrometer designed to give the NOAA advanced capabilities to monitor air pollutants, like ozone, nitrogen dioxide, formaldehyde, and excess particulate matter. In the long term, the tool would have helped scientists paint a clearer picture of how particular weather events relate to broader climate shifts, an NOAA report explains.

Of course, the timing of the cancellation couldn’t have been worse. Huge swaths of the United States and Canada are currently being smoked out by noxious fumes emanating from hundreds of wildfires across North America.

...

Prairie_Seagull

(4,953 posts)
5. Thank you Jim_
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 01:21 PM
2 hrs ago

This, this right here is serious harm in the face of climate catastrophe. Common sense tell us it is better to put out a small fire than a out of control larger one. Fucking Duh. Dangerous Idiot.

Bengus81

(10,770 posts)
9. Probably because Trump is so GD stupid he figures only California has wildfires
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 03:22 PM
29 min ago

Just a guess but probably not far off from reality.

KPN

(17,645 posts)
10. What also pisses me off about this is, ultimately, it's part of an
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 03:22 PM
28 min ago

overall effort that seeks to privatize most government operations and services, beginning at the federal level. So NOAA, may exist, but it will primarily, and to a large extent primarily, function as a contract administrator. Meaning, we will still pay for those operations and services. Will the taxpayers’ cost for those services go down? Doubtful in the increasingly de- if not un-regulated capitalist system we enjoy.

ChicagoTeamster

(1,616 posts)
6. He wanted contracts for SpaceX to replace it. But they didn't develop and deploy a replacement before cancelling program
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 02:55 PM
55 min ago

Last edited Sat Jul 18, 2026, 03:46 PM - Edit history (1)

7. They are going to kill us one way or another.
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 02:59 PM
52 min ago

His personal army of ICE idiots, diarrhea, unaffordable healthcare, nuclear war or air pollution to name a few methods.

relogic

(486 posts)
8. Who thought we
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 03:06 PM
44 min ago

would join the demise of freezing, suffocating dinosaurs in the global aftermath of catastrophic climate change via asteroid millions of years ago, and likely the same fate in our present slow death of human existence from continental, transported wildfire smoke.

Prehistoric lightening and asteroids inflicted upon the predatory and docile Dino 🦕s’ alike without remorse and warning. We are no smarter and deserve no less.

Bev54

(13,580 posts)
11. Spotting the fires is not the problem. The problem is our north is dry after years of low rainfall and climate change
Sat Jul 18, 2026, 03:46 PM
5 min ago

Lightening strikes in these areas are remote and there is no way to get there except by plane and there are so many fires the priority is to work first the fires that are a threat to communities and there are many. We only have so many resources and 1 billion acres of forest land.

We know where the fires are and in the past the fires would burn out on their own after rainfall but not anymore.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why aren't we hearing mor...