General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT: Surprise, Surprise: The Banks Win
[div class="excerpt" style="border: 1px solid #bfbfbf; border-bottom: none; border-radius: 0.3846em 0.3846em 0em 0em; box-shadow: 2px 2px 6px #bfbfbf;"]Surprise, Surprise: The Banks Win[div class="excerpt" style="border: 1px solid #bfbfbf; border-top: none; border-radius: 0em 0em 0.3846em 0.3846em; background-color: #f4f4f4; box-shadow: 2px 2px 6px #bfbfbf;"]IF you were hoping that things might be different in 2013 you know, that bankers would be held responsible for bad behavior or that the government might actually assist troubled homeowners you can forget it. A settlement reportedly in the works with big banks will soon end a review into foreclosure abuses, and it means more of the same: no accountability for financial institutions and little help for borrowers.
Last week, The New York Times reported that regulators were close to settling with 14 banks whose foreclosure practices had ridden roughshod over borrowers and the rule of law. Although the deal has not been made official and its terms are as yet unknown, the initial report said borrowers who had lost their homes because of improprieties would receive a total of $3.75 billion in cash. An additional $6.25 billion would be put toward principal reduction for homeowners in distress.
--SNIP--
Some back-of-the-envelope arithmetic on this deal is your first clue that it is another gift to the banks. Its not clear which borrowers will receive what money, but divvying up $3.75 billion among millions of people doesnt amount to much per person. If, say, half of the 4.4 million borrowers were subject to foreclosure abuses, they would each receive less than $2,000, on average. If 10 percent of the 4.4 million were harmed, each would get roughly $8,500.
This is a far cry from the possible penalties outlined last year by the federal regulators requiring these reviews. For instance, regulators said that if a bank had foreclosed while a borrower was making payments under a loan modification, it might have to pay $15,000 and rescind the foreclosure. And if it couldnt be rescinded because the house had been sold, the bank could have had to pay the borrower $125,000 and any accrued equity.
Much more at the link!
PB
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)They get it back in campaign donations. Rest of us get screwed.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
No Compromise
(373 posts)nt
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts):kick: