Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

renie408

(9,854 posts)
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:43 PM Jan 2013

Are you 'angry' over the end of the payroll tax holiday?

It looks like the DU is writing Joe Curl's blog for him. Thank god somebody intelligent is doing it for once. But good ole Joe says that the concern exhibited by some DUers equates to 'anger' over the payroll tax holiday expiring. He also says that we are 'uninformed'. If this is old news, I apologize. But as it was just brought to my attention tonight (gleefully, I presume) by one of my extreme conservative friends on Facebook, it was news to me.

I told him I would check with you guys and see who is ANGRY over the expiration of the payroll tax holiday and who blames Obama.

So, who's pissed over this thing??

Sorry, I meant to include the link to the blog post:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/6/obama-supporters-shocked-angry-new-tax-increases/

90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you 'angry' over the end of the payroll tax holiday? (Original Post) renie408 Jan 2013 OP
no nt Incitatus Jan 2013 #1
angry when it started lunasun Jan 2013 #2
No. A little sad that I will have to put off some discretionary purchases for another year. slackmaster Jan 2013 #3
not me. had to expire or ss would surely die. eom ellenfl Jan 2013 #4
Not me. wilsonbooks Jan 2013 #5
It was an insanely stupid idea in the first place. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2013 #6
^^^THIS^^^ Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #24
Yes! That's how I had been describing it to people. Lars39 Jan 2013 #39
Gas Tax Holidays are the same story... Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #41
Sometimes it's desperation, not naivete. Lars39 Jan 2013 #44
heavens no. NMDemDist2 Jan 2013 #7
I am glad that we are back to fully funding Social Security. Big Blue Marble Jan 2013 #8
Backstory: Some concern trolls were sent to DU by Rush Limbaugh to whine about it. yardwork Jan 2013 #9
Sadly, the post that started it all, although locked, was retweeted over 500 times. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2013 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author yardwork Jan 2013 #73
not me. TDale313 Jan 2013 #10
Uh, no. And the paycheck wasn't a surprise either. Squinch Jan 2013 #11
Nope. Not a very good idea to begin with. cordelia Jan 2013 #12
No, but I wasn't crazy about its implementation in the first place, and took the beating bullwinkle428 Jan 2013 #13
No but the fact that some people (not on DU) would be angry is as predictable as gravity Fumesucker Jan 2013 #14
Yeah, me either. renie408 Jan 2013 #15
No, not even remotely. I'm thankful that it has been reinstated. nt Poll_Blind Jan 2013 #16
I'm not, I'm relieved it's over. Lone_Star_Dem Jan 2013 #17
No. WilliamPitt Jan 2013 #18
nope...i`m on ss and i`m pissed about that. madrchsod Jan 2013 #19
No NV Whino Jan 2013 #20
Im not. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #21
Nope. Tien1985 Jan 2013 #22
Nope. LiberalElite Jan 2013 #23
I like to have a job so I could have something to be angry about. panader0 Jan 2013 #25
No. Absolutely not. bowens43 Jan 2013 #26
No, not at all n/t Still Sensible Jan 2013 #27
No relieved. I had no doubt some weren't going to be happy about it. TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #28
no. NashvilleLefty Jan 2013 #29
No, I was angry it existed in the first place. forestpath Jan 2013 #30
We got numbers today from HR QED Jan 2013 #31
The number is .02% notadmblnd Jan 2013 #50
they JEFF9K Jan 2013 #32
No abelenkpe Jan 2013 #33
I'm happy to pay nearly $200 more per month RomneyLies Jan 2013 #34
no Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #35
No. It was an ill conceived move, glad it's over. Let's go for a direct stimulus next time alberg Jan 2013 #36
No. BUSH left this stink bomb for the next president to deal with. Hekate Jan 2013 #37
No, I'm relieved. hay rick Jan 2013 #38
No, it was a stupid, stupid, stupid idea to begin with. LisaLynne Jan 2013 #40
^^^^^EXACTLY THIS^^^^^ PATXgirl Jan 2013 #45
Kind of. I have mixed feelings democrattotheend Jan 2013 #42
I know you do. renie408 Jan 2013 #43
LOL, didn't realize I was quoted in someone's article democrattotheend Jan 2013 #49
I know. renie408 Jan 2013 #54
Argh, I never intended for my comment to be used by the Washington Times to bash the president democrattotheend Jan 2013 #56
I'm only angry that they did the holiday in the first place Blue_In_AK Jan 2013 #46
It goes like this. notadmblnd Jan 2013 #47
No, I am actually quite happy that it expired... Agnosticsherbet Jan 2013 #48
Yikes, they quoted me!!! democrattotheend Jan 2013 #51
It was a bad idea when it happened jonthebru Jan 2013 #52
I wasn't mad because it was suppose to be temporary in the first place. southernyankeebelle Jan 2013 #53
No jberryhill Jan 2013 #55
Nope... WillyT Jan 2013 #57
No bluestateguy Jan 2013 #58
They should have raised the cap. MrSlayer Jan 2013 #59
No. Because I'm an adult, and know that no "holiday" lasts for two years. We were.... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2013 #61
Not one bit. abbeyco Jan 2013 #62
I havent got my paycheck yet. i will on the 15 and ill report. darkangel218 Jan 2013 #63
I was angry when they started the payroll tax cut, it doc03 Jan 2013 #64
I'm not angry WhoIsNumberNone Jan 2013 #65
Thank god it ended! peace13 Jan 2013 #66
it was meant as a temporary stimulative measure to help folks during the worst part of the CTyankee Jan 2013 #67
No. n/t Silver Gaia Jan 2013 #68
Yes. Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #69
1 so far RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #71
It doesn't affect me because I'm not employed in the US davidpdx Jan 2013 #70
I'm angry at the way it was handled Arcanetrance Jan 2013 #72
I don't get it Red Sox Jan 2013 #74
I'd say at least 90% of the posts in this thread aren't complaining CJCRANE Jan 2013 #75
What's wrong with herding cats? Agschmid Jan 2013 #81
I believe in paying my way. nt patrice Jan 2013 #76
NO. It was only a temporary stimulus move. They (the president and congress) could have replaced Filibuster Harry Jan 2013 #77
I don't know about angry. Frustrated? Yes. NCTraveler Jan 2013 #78
Stupid idea to begin with..... SammyWinstonJack Jan 2013 #79
No old guy Jan 2013 #80
No. Ganja Ninja Jan 2013 #82
it looks to me like DU is a bit of a weather vane hfojvt Jan 2013 #83
Nope Flashmann Jan 2013 #84
Yes:timing is everything and with such weak economy is BAD regardless... Yupy Jan 2013 #85
Nope nt CokeMachine Jan 2013 #86
Well, I didn't notice any increase in my take-home SheilaT Jan 2013 #87
Nope. Not angry lunatica Jan 2013 #88
Nope. It was always meant to be temporary. Jennicut Jan 2013 #89
No Oilwellian Jan 2013 #90
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
3. No. A little sad that I will have to put off some discretionary purchases for another year.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:45 PM
Jan 2013

No Losmandy equatorial telescope mount this year, unless I get a windfall from somewhere.

wilsonbooks

(972 posts)
5. Not me.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jan 2013

I am glad that the payroll tax is going back into the social security fund so that conservatives can't say that SS is insolvent. Now we need to close tax loopholes on the wealthy and wefare for corporations. I am angry about that.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
6. It was an insanely stupid idea in the first place.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jan 2013

"Hey everyone! Let's ALL OF US stop paying into our SS Acounts for a few years! It'll be FUN!"

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
41. Gas Tax Holidays are the same story...
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:48 PM
Jan 2013

Good luck paying for next year's road construction if you eliminate taxes on gasoline.

How old do some people have to be before they realize that there's no such thing as a free lunch?

Big Blue Marble

(5,104 posts)
8. I am glad that we are back to fully funding Social Security.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:48 PM
Jan 2013

This was not a tax increase. It restores the legal tax that congress had established to fund SS.
You know the rate we have been paying since the eighties with exception of the last two years
when we were increasing the federal debt by borrowing these funds from ourselves by using
general funds.


yardwork

(61,680 posts)
9. Backstory: Some concern trolls were sent to DU by Rush Limbaugh to whine about it.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:49 PM
Jan 2013

The trolls disrupted poorly and were shown the door, but not before Rush got to crow about "Democrat Underground" on his show. One of the concern trolls' posts here was retweeted more than 300 times.

Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #60)

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
10. not me.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:49 PM
Jan 2013

The payroll holiday was a bad idea to begin with, although I get that there weren't a lot of stimulus options at the time. SS needs to be funded/protected.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
13. No, but I wasn't crazy about its implementation in the first place, and took the beating
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:51 PM
Jan 2013

from other DUers for saying so at the time!

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
14. No but the fact that some people (not on DU) would be angry is as predictable as gravity
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:51 PM
Jan 2013

Also that some people would troll DU pretending to be angry is pretty easy to predict as well.

Bear in mind all this was predictable as soon as the tax cut idea was so much as floated.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
15. Yeah, me either.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:51 PM
Jan 2013

But this guy says his wife is pissed that she is going to have to pay more in taxes.


But she would have been fine if they had cut Social Security benefits and gave less help to the poor and discontinued unemployment benefits. Yeah, them's good people.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
17. I'm not, I'm relieved it's over.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:53 PM
Jan 2013

That was a few "concern" trolls who stated that whole thing.

It's good for DU's hits and posting totals though. In the end they've done nothing but help add to the funds needed to keep DU running.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
50. The number is .02%
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:12 AM
Jan 2013

multiply that by your gross pay and that is how much more it will be. For example, $30.00 is 2% of 1500.00

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
34. I'm happy to pay nearly $200 more per month
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:24 PM
Jan 2013

even though the bastard misquoted me and had ot go to another thread from the one he's citing in order to do it.

alberg

(412 posts)
36. No. It was an ill conceived move, glad it's over. Let's go for a direct stimulus next time
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:30 PM
Jan 2013

and not try to back door something that weakens Social Security.

Hekate

(90,755 posts)
37. No. BUSH left this stink bomb for the next president to deal with.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:42 PM
Jan 2013

I was pissed off at Bush for 1) sending everybody $300 out of the surplus, thereby reducing it considerably, and 2) giving the uber-rich a big tax cut, the rest of us a small tax cut, and the payroll tax "holiday" that did nothing but deplete the Treasury further.

Bush sweetly left this stink bomb for the next president to deal with: it had a sunset date of a decade away. Given the short attention span of the American people and given that apparently a lot of them can't add and subtract without taking off their shoes, Bush knew that the next president, no matter who he was, would be vociferously blamed for a tax increase.

I gave my $300 to a couple of liberal causes locally, but it left a very bitter taste in my mouth.

We seem lately to have a lot of vewy vewy concerned newbies who are oh-so-distressed that a few bucks more are being taken out of their checks, AND IT'S ALL OBAMA'S FAULT HE LIED HE'S EVIL.

What a convenient coinkydink that Rush and his ilk can then read such drivel on-air to demonstrate that Democrats at DU are upset at Obama because he lied he's evil blah blah blah.

Anyone who likes can quote this little opinionated history lesson.

hay rick

(7,631 posts)
38. No, I'm relieved.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:45 PM
Jan 2013

I expressed my disgust with the idea when it was implemented several times, including here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4650955&mesg_id=4651196

"...accepting this poisonous deal... will cripple future federal budgets by expanding the deficit and will also pave the way for gutting Social Security by allowing the Republicans and a compliant media to paint the normal employee contributions needed to sustain the program as "tax hikes" only one short year from now...The 'stimulus' the payroll tax holiday provides may help delay further immediate decline in the economy, but it is not of sufficient magnitude to turn the economy around. The difference between the proposed 2% holiday and the Making Work Pay rebates that it replaces is only on the order of $60 billion. A measure of it's futility is the fact that the Republicans are willing to sign on to it..."

One year turned into two, but the rest held up pretty well.

LisaLynne

(14,554 posts)
40. No, it was a stupid, stupid, stupid idea to begin with.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:48 PM
Jan 2013

Now it's time to get back to the business of being adults.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
42. Kind of. I have mixed feelings
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:52 PM
Jan 2013

I think extending the payroll tax holiday would have done more to help workers than cutting income taxes, and it is really outrageous that Congress could find the money to cut the estate tax for multi-millionaires but couldn't find the money to give working people a break. My boyfriend has had a lot of unexpected expenses lately and having his paycheck shrink at the same time really stings.

On the other I understand the argument about Social Security, although my understanding is that they set it up so that the money would not actually come out of the SS trust fund.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
43. I know you do.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:56 PM
Jan 2013

Since you are one of the members Curl quotes in his blog post.

And oddly enough, that 'My boyfriend has had a lot of unexpected expenses lately and having his paycheck shrink at the same time really stings.' line is almost a direct quote from the article.


In fact, here it is....“My boyfriend has had a lot of expenses and is feeling squeezed right now, and having his paycheck shrink really didn’t help,” wrote “DemocratToTheEnd.”

Huh.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
49. LOL, didn't realize I was quoted in someone's article
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:08 AM
Jan 2013

But you can see from my post count that I am hardly a troll. I have been a DU member for 10 years.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
54. I know.
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:14 AM
Jan 2013

I checked.

The repeated wording is interesting, even if not from a troll-ish standpoint. I have probably done it, too, when I think about it. Just recently something happened and I developed a sound bite version of events after a very few retellings and caught myself telling it like it was a story that had happened to somebody else. It is interesting how much of our thinking really is like a narrative that we have written instead of being something we spontaneously experience.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
56. Argh, I never intended for my comment to be used by the Washington Times to bash the president
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:16 AM
Jan 2013

I posted this in response:

I am one of the Democratic Underground posters quoted in this article, the one who said something about my boyfriend's paycheck shrinking right when he has had some other big expenses. So I want to clarify that I am not "shocked and angry". I supported the payroll tax holiday and wish they had extended it, but I understand that there is give and take in these negotiations and Republicans were unwilling to support extending the payroll tax holiday. To be clear, I continue to support the president and so does my boyfriend.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
46. I'm only angry that they did the holiday in the first place
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:02 AM
Jan 2013

which allowed people to feel like something is being taken away from them now. Any outrage could have been avoided.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
47. It goes like this.
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:06 AM
Jan 2013

rush Limpballs sent some of his trolls over here to pose as democrats and complain about the Fica tax holiday expiring. Then he talked about it on his radio show and Drudge wrote in his sleaze blog about a bunch of angry liberals on DU griping about it.


After that they went to S America drank some alcohol, did some oxycontin, engaged in pedophile activity and laughed about how clever it all was to make it look like dems were angry.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
48. No, I am actually quite happy that it expired...
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:06 AM
Jan 2013

There are better ways to stimulate the economy, an this one is no longer necessary

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
51. Yikes, they quoted me!!!
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:12 AM
Jan 2013

I never intended for what I said here to be used in a Washington Times article bashing the president!

I posted this comment in response:

I am one of the Democratic Underground posters quoted in this article, the one who said something about my boyfriend's paycheck shrinking right when he has had some other big expenses. So I want to clarify that I am not "shocked and angry". I supported the payroll tax holiday and wish they had extended it, but I understand that there is give and take in these negotiations and Republicans were unwilling to support extending the payroll tax holiday. To be clear, I continue to support the president and so does my boyfriend.
 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
59. They should have raised the cap.
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:34 AM
Jan 2013

Or eliminated it. They could have kept the break that way.

But, no, I'm not mad about it.

I'm mad that there's still no fucking jobs bill. That these friggin scumbag Republicans just won't do anything. That's what I'm mad about.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,236 posts)
61. No. Because I'm an adult, and know that no "holiday" lasts for two years. We were....
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:36 AM
Jan 2013

lucky it lasted that long.

abbeyco

(1,555 posts)
62. Not one bit.
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:37 AM
Jan 2013

The cap should be raised so that all income is included and means-testing should be applied when it's time to claim benefits. I think the payroll tax holiday hurt SS more than it helped anything.

Just my .02

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
63. I havent got my paycheck yet. i will on the 15 and ill report.
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:55 AM
Jan 2013

But SS couldnt survive on so lil money. But I would lie if I said I didn't care. I'm a full time student working part time so every bit counts :/

doc03

(35,359 posts)
64. I was angry when they started the payroll tax cut, it
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 01:19 AM
Jan 2013

blew up our deficit by about $230 billion. It also gave the Republicans the opportunity to connect the debt to SS. I was happy it ended.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
66. Thank god it ended!
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 01:40 AM
Jan 2013

As a small business owner it was a pain in the butt. In fact I thought they dreamt this thing up to fine businesses who miscalculated tax payments. Times two is so easy and anyway we were only cheating ourselves!

Let's raise the salary cap on this thing and get on with it!

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
67. it was meant as a temporary stimulative measure to help folks during the worst part of the
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 02:22 AM
Jan 2013

recession, not as a permanent thing. That will never occur to the readers of Rev. Moon's newspaper obviously.

However, DUers discomfort with seeing the tax holiday end proves that we need to make other stimulative measures to help folks recover. It can't be solved with one small tax holiday. There needs to be more systemic changes.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
69. Yes.
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 05:38 AM
Jan 2013

America's largest employer is Walmart, followed (if I recall) by McDonalds at number two. Rounding out most of the rest of the top ten are other service and retail providers, such as Home Depot. All of these jobs pay as close to the legal minimum as they possibly can. No benefits of course, they don't even offer full time positions. The national average pay for Walmart checker is 17K a year.

This is the reality for tens of millions of working poor. Wage slavery, no benefits, no healthcare, no jobs, no future, no hope... and no net. For these poor people, the money now once again coming out of their check is a big deal. We are taking this money from the poor, not to ensure that the program will be around for them when they grow old -- we all know that that's complete bullshit -- but to hand it to the baby boomers.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
70. It doesn't affect me because I'm not employed in the US
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 05:58 AM
Jan 2013

But it was meant to be a temporary cut, much like all the Bush tax cuts. It was nice to get the lower end brackets made permanent.

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
72. I'm angry at the way it was handled
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 09:04 AM
Jan 2013

The common layperson that doesn't follow politics saw it as a tax increase cause they didn't know it was a holiday.

 

Red Sox

(2 posts)
74. I don't get it
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 01:33 PM
Jan 2013

We liberals voted for more taxes when we reelected President Obama. Now, many of us are complaining about smaller pay checks. Anyone spending just a few minutes reviewing the fiscal cliff activity in Congress would know that the payroll tax holiday would disappear. If you think this is bad, Nancy Pelosi wants to raise taxes more. We can't have more government entitlements without paying for them. My suggestion would be to pull up Cory Booker's site and learn about his food stamp challenge.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
75. I'd say at least 90% of the posts in this thread aren't complaining
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:36 PM
Jan 2013

about the end of the payroll tax holiday.

However, we also all need to bear in mind that...

a) not everyone who posts on a liberal message board is a liberal
b) liberals do not always agree about everything, or anything ("herding cats" comes to mind)

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
81. What's wrong with herding cats?
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:48 PM
Jan 2013


I know nothing about the company this is an ad for... that being said the ad is funny.

Filibuster Harry

(666 posts)
77. NO. It was only a temporary stimulus move. They (the president and congress) could have replaced
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:41 PM
Jan 2013

it with the Making Work Pay credit which would help low income earners.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
78. I don't know about angry. Frustrated? Yes.
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:42 PM
Jan 2013

We all saw our paychecks go down at a difficult time. I would have like to have seen the "holiday" made permanent, or extended, and the cap raised. It is truly a regressive tax.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
83. it looks to me like DU is a bit of a weather vane
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jan 2013

"we" point whichever way Obama's wind blows.

When Obama was pushing to extend the accursed payroll tax cut, it seemed like DU was all for it, and I was battling against it alone.

Now that Obama has refused to fight to extend it, scarcely a voice can be heard to praise it.

But now I feel sorta funny about it. I always hated it because it was regressive. Most of the benefits went to the top 20%. However, it was LESS regressive than the other Bush tax cuts that we kept. And because it was eliminated, that means that once again, Obama's betrayal means a tax increase for the average member of the bottom 20%.

Go figure.

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
84. Nope
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:54 PM
Jan 2013

Not me...But then I'm retired and have seen no difference in my pension check.....My wife,8 years younger,still works.......She isn't angey either.....

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
87. Well, I didn't notice any increase in my take-home
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 05:27 PM
Jan 2013

a couple of years ago, and I doubt I'll notice any decrease. For me, it'll be about six dollars a paycheck, which tells you how little I'm making these days. I also am paid hourly, and my exact hours vary from paycheck to paycheck, which is partly why I don't notice any difference.

I thought it was a very stupid thing to do back then, and I'm glad the tax holiday was ended. It would simply have been the first, easy step in the direction of eliminating Social Security entirely.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are you 'angry' over the ...