Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums5 Most Terrifying Things About the Likely New CIA Head John Brennan
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/5-most-terrifying-things-about-likely-new-cia-head-john-brennanJohn Brennan in Washington, DC in 2011.
***SNIP
1. Staunch Drone Warrior
Brennan is closely identified with the Obama administrations expanded policy of using drones, or remotely piloted aircraft, to strike at suspected militants in countries such as Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. The Washington Post refers to Brennan as the principal architect of a policy that has transformed counterterrorism from a conventional fight centered in Afghanistan to a high-tech global effort to track down and eliminate perceived enemies one by one. The Post adds that Brennan is at the core of the White House centered effort to use drones and that when operations are proposed in Yemen, Somalia or elsewhere, it is Brennan alone who takes the recommendations to Obama for a final sign-off.
***SNIP
2. Misleading Advocate for Drones
Hes also a serial misleader on the drone program. There hasn't been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency, precision of the capabilities we've been able to develop, Brennan said in June 2011. But as Micah Zenko points out in Foreign Policy, there have been many public reports -- from Pakistani and Yemeni reporters and anonymous administration officials -- of civilians killed by U.S. drone strikes.
***SNIP
3. Supporter of Immunity for Telecom Companies
When the scandal of the Bush administrations warrantless wiretapping of Americans broke, one issue that got a lot of attention was the complicity of telecommunication companies who allowed the Bush administration to spy on their customers. But Brennan thinks those companies should be left alone, despite his skepticism of warrantless wiretapping.
***SNIP
4. Supporter of Torture
Brennan is opposed to waterboarding, the most infamous torture tactic of the Bush years. But on other aspects of the torture program, hes more supportive. A lot of information... has come out from these interrogation procedures that the agency has in fact used against the real hard-core terrorists. It has saved lives, he said in 2007, while he was a CIA aide. The New Yorker's Jane Mayer described Brennan as a "supporter" of the CIA's torture program.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 2306 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5 Most Terrifying Things About the Likely New CIA Head John Brennan (Original Post)
xchrom
Jan 2013
OP
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)1. Why not just appoint Negroponte? Yuck. nt
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)2. Feel the change.
Notice the silence. Or, I guess that civil liberties aren't a Democratic Party issue any more.
Response to Jakes Progress (Reply #2)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)8. Still a general silence compared to more trivial matters.
Both in the media and even on DU.
Our party has been hijacked just as surely as the republican party.
Response to Jakes Progress (Reply #8)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)3. "It has saved lives" (barf) rec. nt.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)4. Meet the new boss.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)6. Somewhere Bush is smiling.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)7. And cheney is cackling.
O seems like a nice enough guy, but he's either reagan democrat all the way or someone or some group is doing the actual running of things.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)10. Well that is depressing...
More of the same ol' same ol'.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)11. Kick
Octafish
(55,745 posts)13. Continuity Of BUSHCHENEYCRIME Government.
The socialists put it politely:
The Brennan nomination: A government of torturers and assassins
Bill Van Auken
WSWS.org 9 January 2013
He has worked to embed our efforts in a strong legal framework, President Barack Obama declared Monday during an appearance in the East Room of the White House. He understands we are a nation of laws. In moments of debate and decision, he asks the tough question and he insists on high and rigorous standards.
The president was describing his nominee as director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, who currently serves as Obamas homeland security and counterterrorism adviser. He also lauded Brennans integrity and commitment to the values that define us as Americans.
One would hardly guess from this high-flown rhetoric that Obama was describing Brennans role as the nations assassin-in-chief. He has demonstrated his integrity and commitment to values, law and standards by chairing the so-called terror Tuesday sessions at the White House, putting together kill lists for the president to approve, and overseeing remote-controlled murder by Predator drones.
The strong legal framework refers to his development of the so-called disposition matrix, a system for codifying and streamlining the extrajudicial executions that are carried out by means of drone missile strikes on a virtually daily basis. This framework, developed by a cabal of military and intelligence officials, has as much to do with a nation of laws as the decrees issued by Hitler during the Third Reich.
CONTINUED...
http://wsws.org/en/articles/2013/01/09/pers-j09.html
There is a difference between the two parties. Policies -- and those chosen to enact and enforce them -- should be part of that differentiation. That is why I vote Democratic -- I work for change.