Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSam Harris: The outspoken atheist responds to Sandy Hook by calling for more guns --
Why does anyone take Sam Harris seriously?The outspoken atheist responds to Sandy Hook by calling for more guns -- and offers the NRA an unexpected assist
By Ian Murphy, Alternet
There are many mysteries posed by this world for which science offers no answer: Why are we here? What is the meaning of life? Who let the dogs out? And, perhaps most confounding, why does anyone take atheist pundit Sam Harris seriously?
In response to the Sandy Hook massacre, Harris stopped sputtering about Muslims long enough to weigh in with a post Sandy Hook essay, The Riddle of the Gun. Unlike the above mysteries, however, the gun is no riddle. As the NRA recently reminded us, firearms are merely a tool. They can be used as a sturdy hammer, a nifty paperweight, a handsome tie clip, a rather crap spaghetti strainer, and, in a desperate pinch, as a convenient murder weapon! Guns are as far from a riddle as one can get. The numbers are brutally simple. According to this Harvard study, and the least bit of common sense, more guns = more gun homicides. And expounding on this topic, without accepting that fact as the moral epicenter of your argument, is tantamount to protecting gun rights over the lives of innocents. Harris, in his continuing quest to overcome the vicious stereotype that atheists are typically rational people, takes a page from NRA President Wayne LaPierres handbook of douchebaggery, and suggests the answer to the riddle of guns should be, in fact, more guns. Only a corporate shill or a professional philosopher could arrive at this position without realizing (or admitting) how utterly full of shit they are.
Those familiar with Harriss record will have already spotted the logical inconsistency. For those blissfully unaware of his many crimes against thinking, the uncharacteristically sound reason Harris gives above for not imprisoning all mentally unstable people is precisely the common sense reason hed previously used to justify a policy of Muslim profiling at airports. (For the satisfaction of reading security expert Bruce Schneier deliver Harris a much-deserved drubbing, see here.) Granted, committing people to a cuckoos nest is a great deal more severe than subjecting them to airport screenings, but theres probably a folksy aphorism I can conjure to make this workapples and oranges are both fruit, if you get my drift. Yeah. Thatll do the trick, just like a junebug in May, or Dan Rather in a Texas teapot.
The ultimate tragedy of Harriss article is that he touches on the answer to the riddle of the gun only to dismiss that answer as existing beyond the parameters of debate. Unlike god or gods, thats one of those things thats true if you say its true, and false if you say its false. Harris is, confoundingly, a popular figure, capable of shifting the frame of acceptable discourse. Why doesnt he give it a go? Well, that may be the biggest mystery of all.
read full article:
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/why_does_anyone_take_sam_harris_seriously/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1725 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sam Harris: The outspoken atheist responds to Sandy Hook by calling for more guns -- (Original Post)
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2013
OP
On so many issues, Sam seems stuck at the level of a high school sophomore
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#4
sadbear
(4,340 posts)1. A lot of atheists consider themselves libertarians.
I'm an atheist in Texas, so I encounter these guys more than I care to. Essentially, they are republicans who are turned off by the republican party's embrace of the religious right.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)2. kik
LAGC
(5,330 posts)3. Sam Harris is spot-on, as usual.
Haters gonna hate.
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)4. On so many issues, Sam seems stuck at the level of a high school sophomore
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)5. that's my impression too. A Bertrand Russell he is not