Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:26 PM Jan 2013

You can't use foreign rebels to argue that Americans could similarly oppose a hostile government

Some people have pointed to rebels in Afghanistan and Syria as examples of people standing up to hostile governments or foreign invaders.

There's only one problem with this analogy. These foreign rebels are not limited to firearms that would be considered legal to own in the United States. Many of these rebels are also being equipped and funded by outside forces.

Last I checked, most citizens do not have access to such weapons as heavy machine guns, RPGs, mortars, anti-tank rockets, anti-aircraft missiles, heavy explosives, IEDs. How successful would rebels in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, etc be if they were limited to standard hunting rifles, shotguns, and pistols?















6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You can't use foreign rebels to argue that Americans could similarly oppose a hostile government (Original Post) Hugabear Jan 2013 OP
I think the concept is ridiculous Mojorabbit Jan 2013 #1
You don't think China would find a way to get arms into the US? Recursion Jan 2013 #2
I bet they're just itching to arm a bunch of extreme right-wingers Hugabear Jan 2013 #3
Don't I know it. We armed the Taliban, after all (nt) Recursion Jan 2013 #4
I think any of those groups would gladly arm the Teabaggers in their crusade against democracy. denverbill Jan 2013 #5
The numerous, and accurate, threads bemoaning RW domination of the US military may help.. dmallind Jan 2013 #6

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
1. I think the concept is ridiculous
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:29 PM
Jan 2013

that this would ever happen here. I hope we as a country would use the ballot box to settle any problems. If it did though, against all odds, I am sure there are a ton of countries who would be happy to arm both sides just like we do in other countries.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
3. I bet they're just itching to arm a bunch of extreme right-wingers
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:38 PM
Jan 2013

The enemy of your enemy isn't always your friend.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
6. The numerous, and accurate, threads bemoaning RW domination of the US military may help..
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:41 PM
Jan 2013

..present one very plausible scenario. You think all the anti-government loons left the army with McVeigh and Nichols? None in the police, national guard either?

Not to mention the fairly sizeable pre-ban automatic weapons inventory, the questionable security at police stations and military bases, and the widespread knowledge of gunsmithing and machining ability.

Now would the insurrection "win"? Probably not - almost certainly not in a direct battle. But as Egypt, Libya, Tunisia etc have demonstrated, it's not always necessary to fight direct battles in insurrection-style conflicts. It's necessary to hold out until public opinion, most especially amongst the military and security forces, swings in your favor. With the Talibanesque indoctrination in the armed forces academies the last 20 years or more, I'm not sure how far of a swing that would need.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You can't use foreign reb...