Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 06:18 AM Jan 2013

The Pentagon's New 30,000-lb MOP Bomb Is Ready To Go

http://www.businessinsider.com/pentagon-michael-gilmore-report-congress-massive-ordnance-penetrator-mop-bomb-ready-aviationist-2013-1


Chicago based Boeing manufactures the MOP shown here for scale

Senior Pentagon officials told Congress the nation's largest conventional bomb, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), is ready for action.

The Air Force said as much back in June after rushing the MOP back to Boeing for $82 million in modifications and enhancements, but this report puts it on the books as deployable ordnance.

According to Bloomberg’s Tony Capaccio, on his annual report, the Pentagon’s director of operational testing Michael Gilmore confirmed that tests conducted with the heavy GBU-57, a 20-foot long, 30,000 pound GPS-guided bomb thought able to penetrate 200 feet of concrete before exploding, have demonstrated that the redesigned bomb is able to hit and destroy deeply buried targets.

The enhanced MOP features tail-fin modifications to fix bugs identified in testings as well as as a second fuse to destroy hardened underground targets.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/pentagon-michael-gilmore-report-congress-massive-ordnance-penetrator-mop-bomb-ready-aviationist-2013-1#ixzz2I8Guw6m1
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Pentagon's New 30,000-lb MOP Bomb Is Ready To Go (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2013 OP
Just what the world needs newfie11 Jan 2013 #1
Charming, Sherman A1 Jan 2013 #2
200 feet of concrete BEFORE exploding? Holy chit. nt OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #3
So all told, that's $110 million. For something that blows up. Scootaloo Jan 2013 #4
Ah, but think of the money it can make.... The Straight Story Jan 2013 #5
Planetary-scale Poison Penis Berlum Jan 2013 #6
the non-nuclear bomb bombs... Javaman Jan 2013 #7
A specialty weapon for a specific task ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #8
Selling that may take some of the sting out of Boeing's Dreamliner fiasco. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #9
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
4. So all told, that's $110 million. For something that blows up.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 06:49 AM
Jan 2013

We don't need to cut "defense" spending. We need to hack it to a fucking stump.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
5. Ah, but think of the money it can make....
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 06:54 AM
Jan 2013

In Mali there is a lot of gold, diamonds, and uranium to be mined. If we blow up people there who might not cooperate with our desires to mine it and sell it to us we will make that money back....

But yeah, I agree - we spend so much money to kill people and so little to help people. And when you say you want to help people with that money instead people get all bent out of shape as though it were a bad thing.

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
7. the non-nuclear bomb bombs...
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:09 AM
Jan 2013

there was the old neutron bomb, that fried people but left the buildings intact, but that nasty fallout is still a problem.

What to do, what to do...

I got it!

Build bigger regular bombs! Packs the punch of a low yield nuke and doesn't leave any of that messy fallout!

It's win-win!

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
9. Selling that may take some of the sting out of Boeing's Dreamliner fiasco.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:16 AM
Jan 2013

And it being announced today may stop the Boeing stock from going into absolute freefall after Japan grounded the Dreamliner.

It's sad when money trumps people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Pentagon's New 30,000...