General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)Sugarcoated
(7,728 posts)but wiki isn't a credible source to some people
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)really very trustworthy, but it can be entertaining.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)I find it, in general, to be reliable as far has history goes. It matches what I read in history books and encyclopedias, and even other sites. Hell, of you don't believe it, just follow the cites at the bottom of the page.
as for current info, say on a law or something similar, it's good, for celebrities, above tabloid reporting sometimes.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)Can't I have SOME fun?
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)start an internet rumour about who it is, I bet you'll eventually find out. Via Snopes.
sinkingfeeling
(51,473 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,839 posts)denverbill
(11,489 posts)Just kidding btw. And believe or not, conservapedia actually got this one correct.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Hekate
(90,793 posts)I tend to go to Snopes for debunking RW rumors and urban legends (especially RW urban legends). They're pretty good for what they do.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,198 posts)At least according to this chain email I received, which I have no reason to doubt.
Sugarcoated
(7,728 posts)railsback
(1,881 posts)Its obvious.
FSogol
(45,526 posts)Those evil guys at Snopes, I bet they've been using reason and facts again!
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)dogey doge?