General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLawrence O'Donnell calls out Tom Selleck. If you haven't seen it, you're missing out.
Wow. O'Donnell questions Selleck's humanity, challenges him to respond to repulsive NRA ad.
I've never previously seen anyone called out like this. O'Donnell builds his case with precision, passion and compassion.
My respect for O'Donnell just went up a full notch. It'll be interesting to see how Selleck responds.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/ns/msnbc-the_last_word/#50502480
babylonsister
(171,079 posts)Kudos to Lawrence; I too look forward to Selleck's response. And bravo/brava to Jon Stewart and Rosie O'Donnell for going there way back when.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)And that clip of Selleck on O'Donnell's show is so indicative of his ilk in that he wants it both ways: to use his celebrity to spew NRA/rightwing talking points but then not be held accountable for it.
ailsagirl
(22,898 posts)Never did like TS. I hope he's mad as hell
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... playing a good man on teevee...."
That left a mark.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Well, "Magnum PI" was the gayest show on the tube back then.... now only exceeded by "RuPaul's Drag Race" (which is better).
I laughed every time that bulky hairy guy unconvincingly said in his high tenor voice "Stop... or I'll shoot." Why do you think all our gaydar went off back then? Us gay guys were like "Girl!.... you so butch!"
Anyway...
It is interesting that he said to Rosie "When I as a kid, the NRA used to....." Because that is a good point. Back when I was a kid in the 60's and early 70's the NRA was a nerdy organization that touted gun safety and knowing gun laws.
Not any more!
And it's clear as day.... Tom!
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... word on the "Magnum PI" stuff. Personally never watched it.
I do however, watch "Bluebloods," in large part because the character he plays is a very principled man. Apparently, that attribute is purely acting, because in real life, Mr Selleck appears to have no principles at all. I may have to reassess whether to watch that program from here forward.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Loved the past clips of Jon Stewart calling out Tom Selleck (wow Jon was so young & cute only 14 years ago) and then the clips of the interviews between Rosie O'Donnell calling out Tom Selleck (but apologizing just when she got close enough to pointing out Tom Selleck's lack of humanity)...
Lawrence didn't hold back....he spoke so directly and left no option for Tom Selleck.....if Selleck has any humanity, he needs to come forward and speak out....if Tom Selleck doesn't come forward and condemn what the NRA just did related to the ad directly bringing in the President's children - then we all know Tom Selleck has no humanity and is also a coward....and who supports this heinous organization and all it stands for.
Frankly, I think Tom Selleck should resign from NRA....that would be the single greatest thing he could do and issue a statement saying he in good conscience could not remain on the board of an organization that only one month after the slaughter at Sandy Hook comes out promoting an App that shows assault weapons targeting coffins and that children as young as 4 yrs old can use. Then he needs to state unequivocally that while he may still feel strongly about certain gun rights etc, that he cannot remain on the board and associated with an organization that would put out an ad that directly brings in the children of the President.
I hope Tom Selleck is paying attention...this is truly his moment and it truly will reveal who he is as a "Mensch".... Or not....
peacebird
(14,195 posts)elfin
(6,262 posts)Lately, his detailed takedown of the NRA has been especially good. Seems to be digging into that board one by one by one, with a horrifying connection to Newtown's residents.
I hope old fashioned shunning is going on in Newtown's against those big NRA powers.
cilla4progress
(24,760 posts)One can really see how he did such a magnificent job writing "The West Wing."
lunatica
(53,410 posts)If I recall correctly didn't Rosie get criticized a lot for 'picking' on him?
I stopped liking Tom Selleck as soon as I found out he was a hard nosed Republican who said Barbara Streisand should shut up about her liberal views. That was back in 1995.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)"How DARE she bring up his political views in an interview setting like that!!" They were just over-the-top with self-righteousness.
Metro135
(359 posts)It was a print interview with Selleck. The interviewer asked him to respond to a remark Streisand had made, and his repsonse was, "Now, Barbra shouldn't have said that." (!) And I rememebr thinking, what, only you have the right to free speech? Barbra should go back into the ktchen where she belongs?
Unbelievable.
Cha
(297,503 posts)to singing and let the politicians do their job. HA! I was so incensesd back then that I wrote a letter to her via snail mail because that was the only form of communication she had.. and, she wrote me back.
She said.. "they don't like the message so they have to try and destroy the messenger."
They must really hate the Social Media that has Emerged via the net, Twitter, and FB, et al!
sheshe2
(83,846 posts)Oh, those bastards never seem get tired of putting "the little woman" in her place!
The GOP, collectively are a bunch of sick, ignorant Knuckle Dragger's!
Thanks, Scuba. I missed it last night!
Cha
(297,503 posts)remembered it and was posting.. I was thinking.. "wow, Barbra Streisand wrote you a letter back..where you were both commiserating about John McCain being such an asshole. In so many words.
To Barbra
sheshe2
(83,846 posts)[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
To Barbara
appleannie1
(5,068 posts)coldbeer
(306 posts)It's not the first time I have heard Lawrence call
someone out. He seems to do it about once a
week. Wow! He hit Selleck hard!
ananda
(28,873 posts)I like Tom Selleck. He has a very high likeability factor. A lot of crazy stoopid right wingers do and did, and yet I still like them... and I will watch their shows if I think they're good.
However, I will also support those like O'Donnell who call them out and provide us a voice speaking out against their wrongheaded views or positions!
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)I don't care one way or the other about the sniveling coward
Erose999
(5,624 posts)life were a Ferrari Testarossa, a mustache, and a badass English butler.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ebxz5AZFUdQ/S9nyXibQYkI/AAAAAAAABJE/y1jaXi1Mfnw/s1600/MV5BMTA2OTkzNDQ1MDJeQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU2MDA4NzMzNg@@__V1__SX450_SY303_.jpg
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)is that he kind reminds of my dad, as far as his passion for gardening goes.
What I don't like about Selleck is everything O'Donnell said.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)And just a note, if you want to leave a note on Selleck the NRA Board member's facebook page, you can't. I tried last night.
I could leave a message for whole foods, but not the board member.
snort
(2,334 posts)hang out with NRA types? It wasn't long after that that he showed up at "Gunsite" where you can only hang out with, you guessed it, NRA types. I know he was there because I saw him in the local cafe (in Chino Valley) yakking it up.
So he's a liar as well.
drynberg
(1,648 posts)This type of calling out needs to follow not only Selleck, but all those "mouthpieces" of death that the NRA uses. I believe the RW calls this "consequences". So be it. Let's get it on.
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)in their own self inflicted publicity when they were caught drinking under age in Austin? People were upset that they were being made public figures for a common mistake of young people. These girls are much younger and their father has the most death threats of ANY President! Now they are being made TARGETS of the gun nuts wrath! All Americans should be outraged!
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)so thanks for the link
Lawrence has filled the giant hole left by Keith. I just adore him
That was a wonderful piece. It's hard to believe that Rosie interview was so long ago. She was fab.
I have come to detest gun humpers, as much as anti choice cretins.... maybe more so
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)but it sounds like the same Cluster B/Borderline Personality Disorder screeching that the right engages in to pull in an emotional response from it's least bright.
I like to think that as Democrats we don't get down and dirty with the pigs, but this makes me sad.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... presented without an emotional appeal simply do not sway opinion He cites several examples where Democrats have been loathe to use emotinal appeals, and lost elections because of it. he also presents several examples where nitwits on the right won elections only because of their carefully constructed appeals to emotion.
It is foolish to cede the most persuasive methods of argument to the other side.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)I'll keep my integrity, thanks.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Quite the contrary, Democrats should be using their own integrity as the basis for emotional appeals. Read the book, it's very informative.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)but I have an advanced degree in Organizational Psych and with all due respect, there is a corollary to blood flow in two separate parts of the brain that causes a measurable drop in IQ (as much as 30 points) when emotionally stimulated in whats called an "amygdala hijack". Understanding this is a powerful tool for persuasion, and using it proactively renders already fearful folks sheep. It IS an integrity issue, most just don't understand why.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Your characterization of using such techniques making "already fearful folks sheep" is exactly what conservatives are doing, deliberately and skillfully.
Countering by employing such techniques may offend your sensibilities, but it doesn't have to be inherently bad. Westin includes several examples that demonstrate highly ethical appeals.
BTW, everyone is being subjected to these appeals, every single day. Do you really think Democrats should ignore this, especially when doing so absolutely guarantees losing elections?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)respond to emotional appeals whether they consciously think they do or not.
You also know that we (including you) disregard information that doesn't comport with our own preconceived notions.
You like to think you make decisions using only one side of your brain. But you are fooling yourself.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)based on the personal need to understand my own emotional deficiencies and how powerfully destructive emotions can be. I am very glad to see someone realize (as I do) that 95% of human behavior is predictable, ie. the "people are people" falsehood.
But knowing that, and knowing how easy it is to lead someone to act irrationally, integrity becomes key.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)There is no corelation between his remarks and their .bs
What you saw was a real dem talking I know. I can remember when they all did that I am that old
We will all save our own lives or die from phony decorum
God I hate auto correct
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)of us. It's human.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)you'd know that.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)For the same reason, and was terribly attacked for doing so. I concede he was an invited guest on her show, and it was tacky, but she didn't deserve the heat directed at her. But, she is an easy target for a lot of people.
cilla4progress
(24,760 posts)And LO gave her her props. She did a fabulous job, I thought.
snacker
(3,619 posts)Thank you for the link.
cilla4progress
(24,760 posts)I think LO is one of the best.
And, I agree ...