Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:33 AM Jan 2013

Lawrence O'Donnell calls out Tom Selleck. If you haven't seen it, you're missing out.

Wow. O'Donnell questions Selleck's humanity, challenges him to respond to repulsive NRA ad.

I've never previously seen anyone called out like this. O'Donnell builds his case with precision, passion and compassion.

My respect for O'Donnell just went up a full notch. It'll be interesting to see how Selleck responds.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755883/ns/msnbc-the_last_word/#50502480

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawrence O'Donnell calls out Tom Selleck. If you haven't seen it, you're missing out. (Original Post) Scuba Jan 2013 OP
Thanks for this; he sure threw down that gauntlet! babylonsister Jan 2013 #1
I saw it last night...it was pretty amazing deutsey Jan 2013 #2
It was brilliant ailsagirl Jan 2013 #3
"... just a man in makeup... 99Forever Jan 2013 #4
playing a good man on teevee. AlbertCat Jan 2013 #27
I have to take your... 99Forever Jan 2013 #29
Holy Sh*t!!! That was amazing! Lawrence O'Donnell nailed it & called out Tom "I'm the NRA" Selleck Pachamama Jan 2013 #5
"Just a man in makeup...." peacebird Jan 2013 #6
Love ODonnell's show! elfin Jan 2013 #7
He is definitely riveting TV cilla4progress Jan 2013 #45
It'll be interesting to see if he responds lunatica Jan 2013 #8
She took a HUGE beating from wing-nuts after that interview. Their attitude was like bullwinkle428 Jan 2013 #9
I remember that! Metro135 Jan 2013 #13
John McCain said something similar about Barbra.. that she should stick Cha Jan 2013 #42
Hey Cha, kinda kool that she wrote you Back! sheshe2 Jan 2013 #46
It was very cool, she. And, when I Cha Jan 2013 #47
Strong Woman... sheshe2 Jan 2013 #48
Another classic by Lawrence O. appleannie1 Jan 2013 #10
I caught it last night! coldbeer Jan 2013 #11
OK, here's the thing. ananda Jan 2013 #12
To me, he comes across as vacuous amuse bouche Jan 2013 #22
Magnum PI was my favorite show when I was a kid... when I was 6 years old the 3 things I wanted in Erose999 Jan 2013 #33
What I like about Selleck MynameisBlarney Jan 2013 #14
It was spot on. Lifelong Protester Jan 2013 #15
He said at the time that he did not snort Jan 2013 #16
YES SIR, JUST WHAT IS NEEDED BY L. O'DONNELL, HOWEVER... drynberg Jan 2013 #17
America's 1st family should be off limits! Remember the outrage over the Bush twins Dustlawyer Jan 2013 #18
I didn't watch him last night, (Can't miss Scandal) amuse bouche Jan 2013 #19
Thinking Tom has watched too many movies. Hubert Flottz Jan 2013 #20
Maybe it's just me galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #21
You need to read Drew Westin's "The Political Brain". He makes an excellent case that facts ... Scuba Jan 2013 #23
On that road lies ruin. galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #24
One doesn't have to compromise one's integrity to use emotional appeals. Westin makes that clear. Scuba Jan 2013 #25
I appreciate what you are saying galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #28
Westin is well versed in how the amygdala works, and writes of it at length... Scuba Jan 2013 #30
If you have a real degree in psychology then you know that ALL humans including yourself KittyWampus Jan 2013 #35
Actually, I was drawn to psych galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #37
if it saves lives i dont care and the dif here is lasrence used fact not lies roguevalley Jan 2013 #39
Using emotional appeal doesn't diminish ones integrity. In fact, our emotions are an INTEGRAL PART KittyWampus Jan 2013 #34
In a fight or flight response, yes. Rational jugements, no. NT galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #38
Rational judgements are less "rational" ultimately then we think they are. If you really study psych KittyWampus Jan 2013 #40
Ugh. I don't debate ego defenses. Thanks for the comments. NT galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #41
Magnum won't comment on guns..oh the irony SummerSnow Jan 2013 #26
Yes, this was superb, excellent!!! northoftheborder Jan 2013 #31
Rosie O'Donnell did it to Selleck in person years ago obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #32
So true. cilla4progress Jan 2013 #44
Powerful snacker Jan 2013 #36
Saw it; loved it cilla4progress Jan 2013 #43

babylonsister

(171,079 posts)
1. Thanks for this; he sure threw down that gauntlet!
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:55 AM
Jan 2013

Kudos to Lawrence; I too look forward to Selleck's response. And bravo/brava to Jon Stewart and Rosie O'Donnell for going there way back when.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
2. I saw it last night...it was pretty amazing
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:17 AM
Jan 2013

And that clip of Selleck on O'Donnell's show is so indicative of his ilk in that he wants it both ways: to use his celebrity to spew NRA/rightwing talking points but then not be held accountable for it.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
27. playing a good man on teevee.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:53 AM
Jan 2013

Well, "Magnum PI" was the gayest show on the tube back then.... now only exceeded by "RuPaul's Drag Race" (which is better).

I laughed every time that bulky hairy guy unconvincingly said in his high tenor voice "Stop... or I'll shoot." Why do you think all our gaydar went off back then? Us gay guys were like "Girl!.... you so butch!"

Anyway...


It is interesting that he said to Rosie "When I as a kid, the NRA used to....." Because that is a good point. Back when I was a kid in the 60's and early 70's the NRA was a nerdy organization that touted gun safety and knowing gun laws.

Not any more!

And it's clear as day.... Tom!

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
29. I have to take your...
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:04 PM
Jan 2013

... word on the "Magnum PI" stuff. Personally never watched it.

I do however, watch "Bluebloods," in large part because the character he plays is a very principled man. Apparently, that attribute is purely acting, because in real life, Mr Selleck appears to have no principles at all. I may have to reassess whether to watch that program from here forward.

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
5. Holy Sh*t!!! That was amazing! Lawrence O'Donnell nailed it & called out Tom "I'm the NRA" Selleck
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:51 AM
Jan 2013

Loved the past clips of Jon Stewart calling out Tom Selleck (wow Jon was so young & cute only 14 years ago) and then the clips of the interviews between Rosie O'Donnell calling out Tom Selleck (but apologizing just when she got close enough to pointing out Tom Selleck's lack of humanity)...

Lawrence didn't hold back....he spoke so directly and left no option for Tom Selleck.....if Selleck has any humanity, he needs to come forward and speak out....if Tom Selleck doesn't come forward and condemn what the NRA just did related to the ad directly bringing in the President's children - then we all know Tom Selleck has no humanity and is also a coward....and who supports this heinous organization and all it stands for.

Frankly, I think Tom Selleck should resign from NRA....that would be the single greatest thing he could do and issue a statement saying he in good conscience could not remain on the board of an organization that only one month after the slaughter at Sandy Hook comes out promoting an App that shows assault weapons targeting coffins and that children as young as 4 yrs old can use. Then he needs to state unequivocally that while he may still feel strongly about certain gun rights etc, that he cannot remain on the board and associated with an organization that would put out an ad that directly brings in the children of the President.

I hope Tom Selleck is paying attention...this is truly his moment and it truly will reveal who he is as a "Mensch".... Or not....

elfin

(6,262 posts)
7. Love ODonnell's show!
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:06 AM
Jan 2013

Lately, his detailed takedown of the NRA has been especially good. Seems to be digging into that board one by one by one, with a horrifying connection to Newtown's residents.

I hope old fashioned shunning is going on in Newtown's against those big NRA powers.

cilla4progress

(24,760 posts)
45. He is definitely riveting TV
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:02 PM
Jan 2013

One can really see how he did such a magnificent job writing "The West Wing."

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
8. It'll be interesting to see if he responds
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:07 AM
Jan 2013

If I recall correctly didn't Rosie get criticized a lot for 'picking' on him?

I stopped liking Tom Selleck as soon as I found out he was a hard nosed Republican who said Barbara Streisand should shut up about her liberal views. That was back in 1995.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
9. She took a HUGE beating from wing-nuts after that interview. Their attitude was like
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:11 AM
Jan 2013

"How DARE she bring up his political views in an interview setting like that!!" They were just over-the-top with self-righteousness.

Metro135

(359 posts)
13. I remember that!
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:56 AM
Jan 2013

It was a print interview with Selleck. The interviewer asked him to respond to a remark Streisand had made, and his repsonse was, "Now, Barbra shouldn't have said that." (!) And I rememebr thinking, what, only you have the right to free speech? Barbra should go back into the ktchen where she belongs?

Unbelievable.

Cha

(297,503 posts)
42. John McCain said something similar about Barbra.. that she should stick
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 07:41 PM
Jan 2013

to singing and let the politicians do their job. HA! I was so incensesd back then that I wrote a letter to her via snail mail because that was the only form of communication she had.. and, she wrote me back.

She said.. "they don't like the message so they have to try and destroy the messenger."



They must really hate the Social Media that has Emerged via the net, Twitter, and FB, et al!

sheshe2

(83,846 posts)
46. Hey Cha, kinda kool that she wrote you Back!
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:05 PM
Jan 2013
"they don't like the message so they have to try and destroy the messenger."


Oh, those bastards never seem get tired of putting "the little woman" in her place!
The GOP, collectively are a bunch of sick, ignorant Knuckle Dragger's!


Thanks, Scuba. I missed it last night!

Cha

(297,503 posts)
47. It was very cool, she. And, when I
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:17 PM
Jan 2013

remembered it and was posting.. I was thinking.. "wow, Barbra Streisand wrote you a letter back..where you were both commiserating about John McCain being such an asshole. In so many words.

To Barbra

coldbeer

(306 posts)
11. I caught it last night!
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:21 AM
Jan 2013

It's not the first time I have heard Lawrence call
someone out. He seems to do it about once a
week. Wow! He hit Selleck hard!

ananda

(28,873 posts)
12. OK, here's the thing.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:27 AM
Jan 2013

I like Tom Selleck. He has a very high likeability factor. A lot of crazy stoopid right wingers do and did, and yet I still like them... and I will watch their shows if I think they're good.

However, I will also support those like O'Donnell who call them out and provide us a voice speaking out against their wrongheaded views or positions!

MynameisBlarney

(2,979 posts)
14. What I like about Selleck
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:58 AM
Jan 2013

is that he kind reminds of my dad, as far as his passion for gardening goes.
What I don't like about Selleck is everything O'Donnell said.

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
15. It was spot on.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:02 AM
Jan 2013

And just a note, if you want to leave a note on Selleck the NRA Board member's facebook page, you can't. I tried last night.

I could leave a message for whole foods, but not the board member.

snort

(2,334 posts)
16. He said at the time that he did not
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:04 AM
Jan 2013

hang out with NRA types? It wasn't long after that that he showed up at "Gunsite" where you can only hang out with, you guessed it, NRA types. I know he was there because I saw him in the local cafe (in Chino Valley) yakking it up.

So he's a liar as well.

drynberg

(1,648 posts)
17. YES SIR, JUST WHAT IS NEEDED BY L. O'DONNELL, HOWEVER...
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:12 AM
Jan 2013

This type of calling out needs to follow not only Selleck, but all those "mouthpieces" of death that the NRA uses. I believe the RW calls this "consequences". So be it. Let's get it on.

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)
18. America's 1st family should be off limits! Remember the outrage over the Bush twins
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:16 AM
Jan 2013

in their own self inflicted publicity when they were caught drinking under age in Austin? People were upset that they were being made public figures for a common mistake of young people. These girls are much younger and their father has the most death threats of ANY President! Now they are being made TARGETS of the gun nuts wrath! All Americans should be outraged!

amuse bouche

(3,657 posts)
19. I didn't watch him last night, (Can't miss Scandal)
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:20 AM
Jan 2013

so thanks for the link

Lawrence has filled the giant hole left by Keith. I just adore him

That was a wonderful piece. It's hard to believe that Rosie interview was so long ago. She was fab.

I have come to detest gun humpers, as much as anti choice cretins.... maybe more so

 

galileoreloaded

(2,571 posts)
21. Maybe it's just me
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:26 AM
Jan 2013

but it sounds like the same Cluster B/Borderline Personality Disorder screeching that the right engages in to pull in an emotional response from it's least bright.

I like to think that as Democrats we don't get down and dirty with the pigs, but this makes me sad.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
23. You need to read Drew Westin's "The Political Brain". He makes an excellent case that facts ...
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:37 AM
Jan 2013

... presented without an emotional appeal simply do not sway opinion He cites several examples where Democrats have been loathe to use emotinal appeals, and lost elections because of it. he also presents several examples where nitwits on the right won elections only because of their carefully constructed appeals to emotion.

It is foolish to cede the most persuasive methods of argument to the other side.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
25. One doesn't have to compromise one's integrity to use emotional appeals. Westin makes that clear.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:43 AM
Jan 2013

Quite the contrary, Democrats should be using their own integrity as the basis for emotional appeals. Read the book, it's very informative.

 

galileoreloaded

(2,571 posts)
28. I appreciate what you are saying
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:00 PM
Jan 2013

but I have an advanced degree in Organizational Psych and with all due respect, there is a corollary to blood flow in two separate parts of the brain that causes a measurable drop in IQ (as much as 30 points) when emotionally stimulated in whats called an "amygdala hijack". Understanding this is a powerful tool for persuasion, and using it proactively renders already fearful folks sheep. It IS an integrity issue, most just don't understand why.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
30. Westin is well versed in how the amygdala works, and writes of it at length...
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:07 PM
Jan 2013

Your characterization of using such techniques making "already fearful folks sheep" is exactly what conservatives are doing, deliberately and skillfully.

Countering by employing such techniques may offend your sensibilities, but it doesn't have to be inherently bad. Westin includes several examples that demonstrate highly ethical appeals.

BTW, everyone is being subjected to these appeals, every single day. Do you really think Democrats should ignore this, especially when doing so absolutely guarantees losing elections?

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
35. If you have a real degree in psychology then you know that ALL humans including yourself
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:31 PM
Jan 2013

respond to emotional appeals whether they consciously think they do or not.

You also know that we (including you) disregard information that doesn't comport with our own preconceived notions.

You like to think you make decisions using only one side of your brain. But you are fooling yourself.

 

galileoreloaded

(2,571 posts)
37. Actually, I was drawn to psych
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 01:01 PM
Jan 2013

based on the personal need to understand my own emotional deficiencies and how powerfully destructive emotions can be. I am very glad to see someone realize (as I do) that 95% of human behavior is predictable, ie. the "people are people" falsehood.

But knowing that, and knowing how easy it is to lead someone to act irrationally, integrity becomes key.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
39. if it saves lives i dont care and the dif here is lasrence used fact not lies
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 01:25 PM
Jan 2013

There is no corelation between his remarks and their .bs

What you saw was a real dem talking I know. I can remember when they all did that I am that old

We will all save our own lives or die from phony decorum

God I hate auto correct

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
34. Using emotional appeal doesn't diminish ones integrity. In fact, our emotions are an INTEGRAL PART
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:29 PM
Jan 2013

of us. It's human.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
40. Rational judgements are less "rational" ultimately then we think they are. If you really study psych
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 01:44 PM
Jan 2013

you'd know that.

obamanut2012

(26,094 posts)
32. Rosie O'Donnell did it to Selleck in person years ago
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:19 PM
Jan 2013

For the same reason, and was terribly attacked for doing so. I concede he was an invited guest on her show, and it was tacky, but she didn't deserve the heat directed at her. But, she is an easy target for a lot of people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawrence O'Donnell calls ...