Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVa. Bill Would Remove Abortion Funding for Women With Severely Deformed Fetuses
Whatever can be the worst and most harmful the republicans champion.
http://www.alternet.org/gender/va-bill-would-remove-abortion-funding-women-severely-deformed-fetuses?akid=9960.1119768.xL975T&rd=1&src=newsletter781949&t=15
A proposal in the Virginia General Assembly to eliminate state funding for certain abortions could force some low-income women to carry to term a fetus with a low likelihood of survival.
Sen. Tom Garretts (R-Lynchburg) bill would repeal a provision of Virginia law that authorizes the Board of Health to pay for abortions for women who meet Medicaid eligibility requirements after a physician certifies that he or she believes the fetus will be born with a gross and totally incapacitating physical deformity or with a gross and totally incapacitating mental deficiency.
Opponents of Garretts bill, including some Senate Democrats, argue that it would unduly burden low-income women economically, physically, and emotionally.
The number of abortions at issue is relatively small.
Sen. Tom Garretts (R-Lynchburg) bill would repeal a provision of Virginia law that authorizes the Board of Health to pay for abortions for women who meet Medicaid eligibility requirements after a physician certifies that he or she believes the fetus will be born with a gross and totally incapacitating physical deformity or with a gross and totally incapacitating mental deficiency.
Opponents of Garretts bill, including some Senate Democrats, argue that it would unduly burden low-income women economically, physically, and emotionally.
The number of abortions at issue is relatively small.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1042 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Va. Bill Would Remove Abortion Funding for Women With Severely Deformed Fetuses (Original Post)
RKP5637
Jan 2013
OP
The bill should add that Virginia is responsible for the lifetime care of these infants
mainer
Jan 2013
#1
All of those deformed fetuses should be turned over immediately to Tom Garrett. He
sinkingfeeling
Jan 2013
#4
Good. Now make the state of VA pay for all their prenatal care and delivery costs and then pay
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#6
mainer
(12,022 posts)1. The bill should add that Virginia is responsible for the lifetime care of these infants
That would make them think twice.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)2. K&R!!! Exactly!!! n/t
MineralMan
(146,320 posts)3. +100. Perfect. Even better,
require those legislators who vote for it to adopt those infants at birth and care for them.
sinkingfeeling
(51,466 posts)4. All of those deformed fetuses should be turned over immediately to Tom Garrett. He
can then pay for their medical care/burial from his own pocket.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)5. Yep!!! n/t
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)6. Good. Now make the state of VA pay for all their prenatal care and delivery costs and then pay
for all expenses associated with these children for as long as they live.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)7. They never connect the dots and implications of their spew. n/t