Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMoyers guest: Lobbyist concerns more important to Congress than ‘concerns of middle America’
U.S. Rep. Peter Welch (D-VA) was on Moyers and Company on Friday to discuss a loophole written into the fiscal cliff deal that allows a major biotechnology company to avoid cost controls on certain Medicare drugs which amounts to a half a billion dollar tax break.
The New York Times found that three senators who supported the loophole had deep financial and political ties to Amgen, the corporation which was not mentioned by name in the loophole but which will save hundreds of millions of dollars as a result.
Welch has introduced legislation to repeal that loophole, both to get the money back to taxpayers but also because, as he says, Congress is not trusted as an institution.
Welch himself said he did not even know about the loophole until the Times article was published.
Even worse, Welch went on, is that Amgen recent paid $700 million in criminal and civic penalties for illegally marketing one of its drugs. So the effect of this is largely that taxpayers are picking up $500 million of the $700 million fine, he said.
The loophole snuck by because the fiscal cliff deal was debated and passed during a lame duck session and went through no committee process. It will not be easy to repeal, he said: And the challenge for us will be to get that on the floor. The Republicans are the majority. They have the authority to say yes or no as to whether this will get on the floor. So the challenge for us will be to advocate this and essentially correct a mistake.
The Times article pointed to three senators Republicans Mitch McConnell and Orrin Hatch, along with Democrat Mac Baucus with strong ties to Amgen who were involved in the loophole deal. Welch believes that tea partiers in the House would support repeal, because a lot of the Tea Party folks are ferociously concerned about spending. And they especially hate the crony capitalism type of spending. In these giveaways to private companies for private gain. I mean, the Amgen CEO in 2010 made $21 million. Its a $17 billion company in sales.
What Amgen did now is legal, Welch said later. Should it be? Is it ethical? Is it the right thing for the country? Absolutely not. But they literally accomplished in the back room, with their access to important people, what they could never have accomplished on the floor of the House or on the floor of the Senate.
The New York Times found that three senators who supported the loophole had deep financial and political ties to Amgen, the corporation which was not mentioned by name in the loophole but which will save hundreds of millions of dollars as a result.
Welch has introduced legislation to repeal that loophole, both to get the money back to taxpayers but also because, as he says, Congress is not trusted as an institution.
Welch himself said he did not even know about the loophole until the Times article was published.
Even worse, Welch went on, is that Amgen recent paid $700 million in criminal and civic penalties for illegally marketing one of its drugs. So the effect of this is largely that taxpayers are picking up $500 million of the $700 million fine, he said.
The loophole snuck by because the fiscal cliff deal was debated and passed during a lame duck session and went through no committee process. It will not be easy to repeal, he said: And the challenge for us will be to get that on the floor. The Republicans are the majority. They have the authority to say yes or no as to whether this will get on the floor. So the challenge for us will be to advocate this and essentially correct a mistake.
The Times article pointed to three senators Republicans Mitch McConnell and Orrin Hatch, along with Democrat Mac Baucus with strong ties to Amgen who were involved in the loophole deal. Welch believes that tea partiers in the House would support repeal, because a lot of the Tea Party folks are ferociously concerned about spending. And they especially hate the crony capitalism type of spending. In these giveaways to private companies for private gain. I mean, the Amgen CEO in 2010 made $21 million. Its a $17 billion company in sales.
What Amgen did now is legal, Welch said later. Should it be? Is it ethical? Is it the right thing for the country? Absolutely not. But they literally accomplished in the back room, with their access to important people, what they could never have accomplished on the floor of the House or on the floor of the Senate.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/25/moyers-guest-lobbyist-concerns-more-important-to-congress-than-concerns-of-middle-america/
video here: http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-foul-play-in-the-senate-and-todays-abortion-debate/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 582 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Moyers guest: Lobbyist concerns more important to Congress than ‘concerns of middle America’ (Original Post)
octoberlib
Jan 2013
OP
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)1. Prison for the three fraudsters