Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:59 AM Jan 2012

Why did Mitt have his fortune in a "blind trust"??

Can he get away with that?

Do all millionaires and billionaires have their fortunes in a blind trust?

How long has he had this "blind trust"?

It is my understanding that investments are put into a blind trust when they might somehow affect a politicians decisions about conflicts of interest? If Mitt has been a businessman for all these years, why would he need a "blind trust"?

Are we to believe that he has no idea where his money is invested?

Something stinks in Denmark...and the Caymans...and Switzerland...

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Mitt have his fortune in a "blind trust"?? (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2012 OP
Blind trusts Bohunk68 Jan 2012 #1
blind doesn't mean you don't know what's in the trust, though does it? Just Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2012 #4
Blind Trust Is What It Says... KharmaTrain Jan 2012 #6
Only afterwards via the tax return, not in real time ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #7
Willard is the posterchild for all that is wrong malaise Jan 2012 #2
In a blind trust, the trustee has full discretion over how the trust invests the money... badtoworse Jan 2012 #3
see my misplaced post Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2012 #5
Because he can't see what's going on with the real America. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #8
Because Mitt has been running for President since 2007. sinkingfeeling Jan 2012 #9
Bush, Sr., put his manhood in one for 1988 MisterP Jan 2012 #10

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
1. Blind trusts
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:16 AM
Jan 2012

are as you said, usually only done by politicians who have already entered political life. And, he has done that some time ago. Remember, he was Governor of MA. And, he has been running or preparing to run for political office for some time. So, I would think that it would be appropriate for him to put all his assets in a blind trust. Doesn't surprise me in the least. Can we fault him for that? I really am not sure.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
4. blind doesn't mean you don't know what's in the trust, though does it? Just
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:42 AM
Jan 2012

that you don't select contents?

Obviously you can know what's in it if they found out Mitt had Fannie Mae stock

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
6. Blind Trust Is What It Says...
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:50 AM
Jan 2012

You can find out what's in a blind trust but its after-the-fact. Gneut found out through going through Mittens disclosure forms and his 2010 tax returns.

This Fannie Mae game is just that...anyone who was invested during the "go-go" days of a decade ago had a money invested in real estate "securities"...that's why Mittens nailed Cadrich in having them in his portfolio as well.

Mittens knows what's in those trusts but he doesn't have the control to move assets around...but it doesn't prohibit the trust from investing in companies or sectors that can and will come back to haunt him in the future. When you're that filthy rich, a good chance you've got money invested all over the place, including in stocks and funds that can and will be used against you in a political campaign.

My hopes are Mittens wakes up one morning (if he hasn't already) and says that his ego just isn't worth all this...take his money and go far far away from the American political system...

malaise

(269,056 posts)
2. Willard is the posterchild for all that is wrong
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:18 AM
Jan 2012

with corporate raiders.
He hid his income from everyone - a complete and total ReTHUG scumbag.
An unpatriotic nasty piece of work

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
3. In a blind trust, the trustee has full discretion over how the trust invests the money...
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:40 AM
Jan 2012

...and the grantor of the trust (in this case, Mitt) cannot direct those investments. In fact, I believe the grantor does not even know how the money has been invested by the trustee. Politicians do this to avoid conflicts of interest that could occur if the grantor were in a position to direct public spending in a way that would benefit his own investments.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did Mitt have his for...